Once a Sailor, always a Sailor.
I was wearing my birthday suit. You guys all said I had to and I made you promise not to peek. Unbelievable. I'm not sure I can trust you guys anymore.
Once a Sailor, always a Sailor.
I suspect a quick mod response and a thread closing are approaching the "I KNEW IT" thread.
I don't think the mods are that strict about it. From what I've seen, the rule has been enforced on comparing the religion to negative acts. Saying the word, itself, isn't harmful or accusational.
DrillSGT asked a question about a "word" being banned here. I'd say the answer to his question is "No", it's not a banned word. However, discussion of the meaning and background of the word is against the "No religion" rule.
We use underscores and alternate words in jest... but fear for the inconsistency of the banhammer is likely the reason for that.
Didn't someone in the Canada thread get the hammer for just putting that word with a question mark?
Didn't someone in the Canada thread get the hammer for just putting that word with a question mark?
Negative, Ghostrider, that logic is flawed.Just wondering why someone doesn't start their own forum to discuss local politics, religion, race relations etc. The things a handful of folks on here like to ***** about nearly daily. You could link it to INGO in every thread that is teetering on going south.
Just an idea...
No offense, but I'm pretty sure all the fussing, whining and silly word play isn't gonna change the INGO rules. Why not make a forum to link to where you can have free reign?
Nope, and I think you already know that.
Not exactly. He worded it sarcastically.
Negative, Ghostrider, that logic is flawed.
This isn't about what the rules are. This is about how the rules are enforced.
And for the love of Pete, it's free REIN. As in giving the horse his head, as in giving the horse the freedom to decide where to go instead of being controlled by the rider. What is free reign anyway? Isn't that a redundancy?
So are hookers and blow but that doesn't mean we should invest so much time and energy into it
I'm available anytimeSorry, I'll try to find a better grammar/spell checker with brains.
I'm happy to live within the rules. As they are written. Even though I dislike them. That has never been my beef.I'm just sayin', if "these problems" are such a big deal that they MUST be discussed nearly every single day, why not take them elsewhere? Make your own rules and enforcement there? No language filter, no mods, no rulez? Why not?
...I'm happy to live within the rules. As they are written. Even though I dislike them. That has never been my beef.
I'm not speaking exclusively of you. There seems to be a handful of folks who make it their routine to gripe daily about the rules and or enforcement. Why?
I don't get what the big deal is about starting a separate forum for "fringe" discussion. One where the content doesn't readily blow back on ALL the forums participants as if their characterization was in the forums title.
Indiana
Gun
Owners
could certainly participate, but not necessarily be classified as such by virtue of the forum's name.
Read closer at some people's complaints. It's less about the rules (I respect and try to abide by them), but mostly about the questionable or inconsistent enforcement of said rules.
It's the same thing. Complaining is complaining. Some do it daily.
I'm suggesting a solution to the problem, whatever you choose to call it.
I know there are members on here plenty sharp enough to accomplish this. You sir are one of the prime candidates.
Or, let the problem get solved from within. Did you notice a mod recently resigned for the exact reason we've been discussing recently? I'm hoping mods will notice the problem from within and stop putting the blame on users (who aren't ENTIRELY culpable). There exist less-than-perfect mods, they aren't infallible. We have to live with it until changes are made. Until then, I'll continue enjoying INGO.
BW, I thought this was the thread to ***** about INGO, not the thread to ***** at the people who are *****ing about INGO.