JeremiahJohnson
Master
Absolutely, but you are not perfectly within your rights to assault him.
Didn't say I would. Person's got a right to eat lunch.
Absolutely, but you are not perfectly within your rights to assault him.
Absolutely, but you are not perfectly within your rights to assault him.
Why should he have more of a right to put anything he wants on a tee shirt, but I can not?
So...then I'm perfectly within my rights to sit straight across from him and eat my lunch with my favorite tee shirt that reads, "Winning the hearts and minds of our enemy - two in the heart/one in the mind"?
Absolutely, but you are not perfectly within your rights to assault him.
Huh? Where did I say he should?
Where did I say I was going to assault him?
That has been a common theme in this thread. Nothing wrong with your shirt solution.
I figure if someone's going to wear something offensive, then he/she must be a free thinker and welcomes opposing viewpoints and informative debate. Figured also I'd sit right across from him just in case he wanted to engage in civil discussion about the two opposing viewpoints. Guarantee my voice would be low and my points of interest succinct and well thought out.
You see, in my humble opinion, if someone wants to turn their body into a screaming billboard, and no one says anything to the contrary, then they will assume they are right, and just, and have the tacit approval of the masses. An honest response is to let them know you disagree.
Yup.....and then knock out their teeth......................
Lol, you just enjoy knocking out teeth!
he is 92 after all.