How many whingeing prime time interviews did Edward VIII give, again?Ya know, this isn’t a first right? This has happened before, except it was a King, not a prince that walked away.
How many whingeing prime time interviews did Edward VIII give, again?Ya know, this isn’t a first right? This has happened before, except it was a King, not a prince that walked away.
None, he was banned from being interviewed, and exiled from the UK unless he has the king’s permission to return.How many whingeing prime time interviews did Edward VIII give, again?
The royal family of recent has a big and on record problem with getting in the middle of marriages and ruining lives.
If I was Harry and what he alleges is true there would have been a London tea party.
It honestly blows my mind. The whole King Edward VIII being made to leave, how? You're the freaking King of England. Your face is on money. Who the hell has the power to tell you what to do?
She has a lot of power that she has choosen not to use. Her father declared war on the Nazis.figurehead
[ fig-yer-hed ]
See synonyms for figurehead on Thesaurus.com
noun
a person who is head of a group, company, etc., in title but actually has no real authority or responsibility: Most modern kings and queens are figureheads.
That's not even close to a universal truth. Skin tone among blacks is a pretty common topic of conversation. I have a mixed race daughter, and we openly discuss her skin tone and the skin tone of her children. Open conversations without any racial bias is pretty common in mixed race families. Heck, it's even good-naturedly joked about sometimes. Of course, when people are looking for things to be offended about, the topic will be taboo. I didn't raise my kids to be looking for things to be offended about, though.That makes her different from any other entitled celebrity or royal how? Look, she might be a bottom feeder, but if her account is true, and I haven’t seen anyone say it isn’t, then there’s some valid complaints.
Sure, I get wondering about the skin tone of a coming b/w bi-racial child. But it that isn’t a conversation you want to verbalize to the parents, unless you want to get punched in the nose. So that’s a pretty significant f-up.
I think theres a difference between simple curiosity, and how it'll make the royal family look which was heavily implied in the interview.That's not even close to a universal truth. Skin tone among blacks is a pretty common topic of conversation. I have a mixed race daughter, and we openly discuss her skin tone and the skin tone of her children. Open conversations without any racial bias is pretty common in mixed race families. Heck, it's even good-naturedly joked about sometimes. Of course, when people are looking for things to be offended about, the topic will be taboo. I didn't raise my kids to be looking for things to be offended about, though.
That topic also arises amongst us commoners when skin tones are involved. I don't want to go much deeper into THAT issue, but a lot of men, regardless of race, expect that their children will look like them, and when they don't it can cause issues with how it reflects on them and their family.I think theres a difference between simple curiosity, and how it'll make the royal family look which was heavily implied in the interview.
And yet, our government has become akin to royalty without the royal titles. They exempt themselves, their families, and their minions from the edicts they apply to us simple citizens, they enrich themselves through corruption, they engage in foolish legislation to gain favor from powerful special interest groups, they tax us unmercifully and waste the money they take from us, and they go to work daily looking for ways to further subjugate us to their power.From 1775-1781 a rag-tag group of freedom loving Colonists went to war against the most powerful empire on Earth, and won. Of the many things they did for us, giving us the right to not give a **** about the royal family definitely makes the list.
I never said it was limited to the royal family.That topic also arises amongst us commoners when skin tones are involved. I don't want to go much deeper into THAT issue, but a lot of men, regardless of race, expect that their children will look like them, and when they don't it can cause issues with how it reflects on them and their family.
It's not an issue that is uncommon, or solely attributable to the British royals.
I was just emphasizing that this type of discussion is not limited to the royal family, and should not be considered a scandalous or unusual conversation. It's a tempest in a teapot.I never said it was limited to the royal family.
This is a thread about the royals, which is why i was talking about them.
So, did he go on Ed Sullivan (or whatever) and cry about how they were mean to him? There is a huge difference between Edward and Andrew. I don't recall Wallis leading him around by the short hairs, eitherNone, he was banned from being interviewed, and exiled from the UK unless he has the king’s permission to return.
They've been quite good chaps since then, though; except for that burning the white house thing, of courseA firearm forum siding with a family that actively tried to stop our country's Independence, would've forced some of the strictest gun laws on us if we had not prevailed and trashing the lone American in it all. Interesting.
What??? Are you trying for a Cathy Newman award???A firearm forum siding with a family that actively tried to stop our country's Independence, would've forced some of the strictest gun laws on us if we had not prevailed and trashing the lone American in it all. Interesting.
A firearm forum siding with a family that actively tried to stop our country's Independence, would've forced some of the strictest gun laws on us if we had not prevailed and trashing the lone American in it all. Interesting.