I have read that Dan Wesson stainless has a galling problem...
That issue has been rectified and the guns were fixed at no charge to the buyers. I have shoot the **** out of my stainless Point Man 9 with no issues whatsoever.
I have read that Dan Wesson stainless has a galling problem...
That issue has been rectified and the guns were fixed at no charge to the buyers. I have shoot the **** out of my stainless Point Man 9 with no issues whatsoever.
I have read that Dan Wesson stainless has a galling problem...
I had a Springer loaded in stainless that galled up on the 2nd mag through it.
Found and fixed the issue with out returning but it does happen.
That used to be a common problem with early stainless guns (Randall? AMT?). I'm surprised it's happening with current makes, though.
CM ... what did you do to fix it?
This was at the peak of the empty LGS shelve right after Sandy Hook. I was standing in PSS when they unwrapped this one. QC must have been stretched to the limit's by the demand and they let it out the door with some machine burrs and tags still in the rails/slide. Picked it all out and stoned the machined surfaces until everything was happy.
I fell in love with these Nighthawk's, but once again, too rich for my blood.
No Sigs.....nope.....no way.
I kinda like them. With that big external extractor and squared, teutonic slide profile, what's not to like.
I can understand CM's aversion to them based on his addiction to the original recipe, but when you compare the specs for the price, they don't do too badly for the asking price. I paid $900 for my full size railed nickel 1911 and for that, I got night sights, G10 grips, front strap checkering, an extended slide release and thumb safety and nice mag well. It compares well to my Kimbers and Colts dollar for dollar. Not to mention, it's a sweet shooter too.
I know they're not true 1911s, but they are a sweet piece for the $$, and right purty, too
(not my photo)View attachment 48539
I kinda like it...
"You" would.........
Nothing wrong with the gun
. I like the looks of it, but would rather have a "true" 1911.
Oh I am sure they are great shooters but to my understanding the are 1911's in name only.
Fair enough. One of these days, I'll have to upgrade the internals on mine with some EGW goodness. Other than that, I'm good with it as is, square slide and all. It is a sweet shooter though, even if it tips the scales at 48 oz loaded.