People with religious beliefs have no business being in politics? Is that seriously what you just said?
The phrase "separation of church and state" is not in the Constitution, or any legislation. Further, the intended meaning, in the context of its use, was the prevention of the state interfering with the church - not the other way around.
Well, if they can get a large enough majority to get a constitutional amendment approved, and then ratified in a sufficient number of states, then that might be an issue. That's the beauty of a constitutional republic versus a democracy.
So, you can see the impending issue with illegal immigration and spread of Muslim sharia culture, and can envision how it might impact our society in 100 years - but at the same time, you are unable to see how substantial burdens are being placed (or attempted to be placed) on the right of religious exercise across the country, and can't see how enacting an RFRA is necessary?
Also, the RFRA doesn't "involve the government where it doesn't belong." To the contrary, the RFRA constrains where the government may involve itself.
If your argument is that there were more pressing matters to attend to, I can buy that argument. I believe that the RFRA was needed on its own merits anyway, but at least it's a valid argument.
