The Sad But True Pictures Thread

[Jerchap2]

 

[Jerchap2]

 

[Jerchap2]

 

[Jerchap2]

 

[alabasterjar]

Kim Jong-Un Consults With Planned Parenthood To Learn How To Cover Up Atrocities

Ok, since it's the Babylon Bee, maybe not true, but...

 

[Jerchap2]

 

[Jerchap2]

Not sure where the number came from, but I have been hearing numbers in this range for some time.

 

[alabasterjar]

Not sure where the number came from, but I have been hearing numbers in this range for some time.

Thomas Sowell - The Real History of Slavery:
[video=youtube_share;VWrfjUzYvPo]http://youtu.be/VWrfjUzYvPo[/video]

 

[Phase2]

 

[JettaKnight]

Not sure where the number came from, but I have been hearing numbers in this range for some time.

No liberal complains about that?


You need to get out and talk to more liberals.

 

[2A_Tom]

Please post links to any liberals/democrats/progressives with a national audience doing so.

You tend to pick at nits when someone makes a broad statement that it is not commonly done.

 

[jamil]

Please post links to any liberals/democrats/progressives with a national audience doing so.

You tend to pick at nits when someone makes a broad statement that it is not commonly done.

It’s a fair nit. The caption said “no liberal ever”, not “no liberal on the internet”.

That said, notwithstanding insufficiently precise language, there is a true enough sentiment in there. But rather than saying “liberal”, I would constrain that to say most SJWs. Carl Benjamin identifies himself as a liberal, center left, and he’s made the same point about the SJWs. They only seem to care about “oppressors” if it serves as a narrative against white people.

 

[2A_Tom]

Helical vermin ova aside, most language is not designed to be absolutely precise. I am sure that some professors enjoy picking apart doctoral theses' that required years of work and preparation.

What we need is a review board in order to ensure that every meme is either a thousand words or accompanied by a ten page disclaimer.

My point is that if the gist is evident why bother being a ****.

 

[Doug]

Seemed like an easy question to answer...
A search for "Liberals condemning Muslim slavery on news networks" found no instances of liberals condemning Muslim slavery.
Of course, that doesn't PROVE that they haven't done it hundreds or thousands of times, just that i didn't find it with my search.

 

[2A_Tom]

The Libprogocrats Don't see anything wrong with muslim treatment of women either. Every one of them? Probably not, but generally.

 

[sharkey]

 

[daddyusmaximus]

^^^ Especially when their morals are all out of whack.

 

[rhino]

The thing about AOC saying it's better to be morally right than to be factually correct:

1. She is neither morally right nor factually correct.
2. The two are not mutually exclusive except perhaps in the zero-sum mindset of a Marxist.

 

[jamil]

The thing about AOC saying it's better to be morally right than to be factually correct:

1. She is neither morally right nor factually correct.
2. The two are not mutually exclusive except perhaps in the zero-sum mindset of a Marxist.

Not to mention that without being factually correct, how can you possibly apply morals correctly? It’s like she’s saying her feelings don’t care about your facts. Morality requires both the moral principle and factual components to fulfill its purpose.

Morality without being factually correct makes you justify participating in a money laundering scheme to fund your election campaign. If left unchecked it makes you try to pass oppressive laws to extract money from those who earned to to pay those who didn’t earn it to vote for you.

 

[2A_Tom]

The Libprogocrats are as morally correct as Hitler and they that were just following out his orders.