The Sad But True Pictures Thread

[SmileDocHill]

Not "sad but true" but the above toy posts had me finding this gem. Pretty cool 8 minutes of cool war related toys from the 50's and 60's.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=reeWHLqedIw

 

[rob63]

Not "sad but true" but the above toy posts had me finding this gem. Pretty cool 8 minutes of cool war related toys from the 50's and 60's.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=reeWHLqedIw

I had several of those! It got a little dusty in here when I started thinking about the sacrifices mom and dad made to get me stuff like that. I seriously doubt I appreciated it at the time. Thanks for sharing that video.

 

[AmmoManAaron]

Boston August 19, 2017

There were reportedly chants of:

"HEY HEY, HO HO, FREE SPEECH HAS GOT TO GO!"

 

[AmmoManAaron]

 

[actaeon277]

Boston August 19, 2017

There were reportedly chants of:

"HEY HEY, HO HO, FREE SPEECH HAS GOT TO GO!"

The idiocy astounds me.

 

[actaeon277]

I don't know about "the biggest crime"*** but it's high up there.

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

We just discovered his Overhaulin' show a few months ago. Talking about a set of skills and talent I wish I had.

I don't know about "the biggest crime"*** but it's high up there.

 

[AmmoManAaron]

 

[Kutnupe14]

I don't know about "the biggest crime"*** but it's high up there.

You know, that was by design right? I touched on this in a point a while ago.

 

[IndyTom]

I used to enjoy building my computers, but building a laptop or a tablet isn't really a home project I'm looking to get into (I'm sure there are sites dedicated to such things) and I haven't upgraded my desktop in....a long time (other than replacing a HDD). I think my job sucked a lot of the fun out of it for me, though, to be honest.

 

[AmmoManAaron]

 

[AmmoManAaron]

 

[jamil]

Everyone owns something is another way of saying no one owns anything.

 

[Thor]

Something you'll never see again

I had one of those!! I broke the stock off butt stroking a tree like they did with the Garands in Combat! That was the beginning of my distrust for plastic guns...

 

[AmmoManAaron]

 

[Kutnupe14]

Uhhh... technically $3. Intersex is a real thing.

 

[sharkey]

Uhhh... technically $3. Intersex is a real thing.

And what about those guys who like putting it to buses and taxis? The metrosexuals?

 

[actaeon277]

 

[AmmoManAaron]

Uhhh... technically $3. Intersex is a real thing.

Admittedly there are a few people that are literally equipped in some fashion with both male and female reproductive parts. I seem to recall a controversy about a black runner a few years ago who dominated in women's running events despite having small internal testicles as well as some sort of vagina. Another example would be a person lacking natural reproductive parts entirely. So, with people such as these two examples, is their gender "intersex" "neither" "both" "it depends" or "it depends on the individual-in-question's opinion"? Honest question, I really don't know. If I'm understanding your view correctly though, you are saying genders are M, F, and intersex (which encompasses the both and neither options)? But if I'm interpreting your view correctly, might it also be possible that there are FOUR genders (M, F, both, and neither)?

I tend to think whatever the answer is, it doesn't really mean that there are more than two genders. Grossly simplifying, the options seem to me to be M, F, neither, or both (2 genders which generate 4 options of being). Not M, F, and W where W is a distinct third gender...and also not M, F, V, and G where V and G are distinct third and fourth genders, respectively.

 

[patience0830]

Admittedly there are a few people that are literally equipped in some fashion with both male and female reproductive parts. I seem to recall a controversy about a black runner a few years ago who dominated in women's running events despite having small internal testicles as well as some sort of vagina. Another example would be a person lacking natural reproductive parts entirely. So, with people such as these two examples, is their gender "intersex" "neither" "both" "it depends" or "it depends on the individual-in-question's opinion"? Honest question, I really don't know. If I'm understanding your view correctly though, you are saying genders are M, F, and intersex (which encompasses the both and neither options)? But if I'm interpreting your view correctly, might it also be possible that there are FOUR genders (M, F, both, and neither)?

I tend to think whatever the answer is, it doesn't really mean that there are more than two genders. Grossly simplifying, the options seem to me to be M, F, neither, or both (2 genders which generate 4 options of being). Not M, F, and W where W is a distinct third gender...and also not M, F, V, and G where V and G are distinct third and fourth genders, respectively.

STOP IT. JUST STOP! AAAAAAAIIIIIIIIUGHH