Also, Elaine Kamarck had some thoughts on the delegate complaining
Party primaries are not ‘public decisions,’ rules expert says
Party primaries are not ‘public decisions,’ rules expert says
Its hard to win when it's rigged against you to begin with. These party leaders have been vehemently anti-Trump since the beginning.
I stated what I meant. Notice the questions after. And while it is true that those states haven't split it's electors, they are in fact not winner take all states. So no the Electoral college is not winner take all universally, it depends on the state. So what you said remains false.
And which 1 million voters? Considering as of Jan 1st 2016 there were a total of about 1 million registered repubs in the state. All of them disagree?
How does cancelling a non-binding straw poll silence them? They still voted for the delegate of their choice, the delegates were selected the same as they have been for the last 2 (now 3 counting this year) election cycles. They have had primaries for 3 total election cycles in their history, they have had caucuses for the rest. Cancelling the straw poll had absolutely nothing to do with Trump or "silencing" the voters, it had to due to a rule change by the national GOP. Cancelling the straw poll had nothing to do with the delegate selection process. The only effect of it was to keep the delegates unbound same as they have always been. And considering that there have been attempts to change it from a caucus back to a primary and they have failed, I'd say yes people do support the process.
ETA And what specific chicanery are you referring to? I know of one thing that could possibly be considered as such, on the ballot a number was repeated, it went iirc 599,599,691. A typo. And I'm going to guess that if a person would have marked the circle that was supposed to be 600, the scanning machines would have counted it as 600. Or are you referring to the guy that claims he was removed from the state convention?
Here's your winners for New York's vote tonight. Conveniently, I only have to post one image.
An interesting convention lies ahead.
It won't be interesting. The parties won't overthrow the will of the people. They know that if they nominate someone else when the people have made their input so undeniably clear by voting in mass for a candidate, it will be the end of the party.
Trump just pretty much sealed the deal with the curb stomping he put on Cruz and Kasich in NY.
While I'm not a huge Trump fan. I hope you're right, I'd rather vote for Trump than see him go Independant, almost guaranteeing a Hillary win. Best bumper stick I've seen (book of faces or maybe INGO): 2016, We're Screwed
And if that happens, any traces of allegiance I still had to the party will be gone.
An interesting convention lies ahead.