Why do I doubt most of the words in that headline
It won't matter to the electorate. When Bill Clinton took advantage of his position to get sex, it was just sex. Now their answer is that he's not running and Hillary is a victim. They totally ignore the victims that pointed at Hillary for threatening them.Meanwhile bill is raping 13 year olds.
You have a point. I think either of these major candidates will get us into WW3.If you think a loss is inevitable, you're wasting time on this forum that could be spent building a bomb shelter.
Meanwhile bill is raping 13 year olds.
It won't matter to the electorate. When Bill Clinton took advantage of his position to get sex, it was just sex. Now their answer is that he's not running and Hillary is a victim. They totally ignore the victims that pointed at Hillary for threatening them.
They also ignore the idea of having someone like that living in the White House, even though it has not been uncommon to attack president's first families. Sometimes there were issues made just because a first lady just didn't look good enough or seem sophisticated enough or said too much or said too little. Both sides have their hypocrisy, and it's going to be even stronger when the opponent also has strong negativity factors.
More of this Bill Clinton dirt seems to just be making more of a sympathy vote for Hillary.
A couple of things here.
First, I don't doubt that Hillary threatened Bill's victims. But short of some very direct, undeniable evidence, you're right, for the people who could at least consider voting for Hillary now, they don't care. And the died-in-the-wool Hillary supporters, they wouldn't even care if there was such evidence, just like the avid Trump supporters don't care what Trump does.
Second, it really does matter what Bill did whether Dems want to admit it or not. They can't condemn Trump's behavior without admitting to and condemning Bill's behavior. While it's true that we're talking about Trump, not Bill. And it's just as invalid to say Trump gets a pass because Bill got a pass. But here's the difference. Bill Clinton is being used as a surrogate to campaign for Hillary.
It DOES matter that the campaign is benefiting from the campaigning of Bill Clinton, while the same campaign is accusing Trump of what Bill Clinton has done. If they want the moral high ground here, Hillary should divorce Bill, the Dems should denounce Bill, and leave him behind disgraced and alone. THEN the Democrats get to talk about Trump's sexual exploitation.
Is he? If you've got some hard evidence on that, might want to get it to a news outlet quick before the election. Could make a difference.
If you read about Trump's exploits and aren't bothered, change name to Bill Clinton and read again. Bothered now? You're part of the problem.
Excusing and defending Trump for similar actions ... you might become what you hate. Should be careful here.
It's a race to see which side has more sexual abuse now.
Yeah. It works both ways. The accuser must be prepared to condemn his own or the outrage is without merit. But I think the bigger issue here for the intellectually honest Trumpers, is that they can overlook the behavior of Trump because of issues more important to them, and condemn the behavior of Bill, because Bill's team is accusing Trump of what Bill has done. For the others, they don't care what Trump does. As long as he stays "Trump".
I heard a NeverTumper say this was Donald Trump during his recent visit:
Manager Releases Photos of Man Who Flashed Customers at McAlister's Deli in Hamilton County | 93.1 WIBC
I heard a NeverTumper say this was Donald Trump during his recent visit:
Manager Releases Photos of Man Who Flashed Customers at McAlister's Deli in Hamilton County | 93.1 WIBC
Promises, promises.Today is voting day.
I will click this thread no more, forever.
Today is voting day.
I will click this thread no more, forever.