4 out of previous 7 Illinois governors went to prison | abc7chicago.com
The apple didn't fall far from the tree.
Breaking news...years ago.
4 out of previous 7 Illinois governors went to prison | abc7chicago.com
The apple didn't fall far from the tree.
HEY STOP IT!
There shall be no pointing out of hypocrisy on INGO.
I'm not a Hillary fan, by any means. But the FBI's incursion into the election bothers me to no end.
To see INGO members take prurient pleasure from it bothers me about as much.
I'm not a Hillary fan, by any means. But the FBI's incursion into the election bothers me to no end.
To see INGO members take prurient pleasure from it bothers me about as much.
If i am taking any pleasure it certainly isn't of the prurient kind!
- Clinton indictment likely on pay-to-play.
It was a correlation of birthplace and political business as usual. But I see the point was missed.Breaking news...years ago.
I had to Google that word, I admit it.
We don't know what you say or do behind close doors either. Is it time to initiate an investigation of your activities by the FBI? After all, we don't know if you will attempt to hold public office at some point…...
I'm not a Hillary fan, by any means. But the FBI's incursion into the election bothers me to no end.
To see INGO members take prurient pleasure from it bothers me about as much.
I'm not a Hillary fan, by any means. But the FBI's incursion into the election bothers me to no end.
To see INGO members take prurient pleasure from it bothers me about as much.
What about decades of sweeping her **** under the rug? She HAS corrupted the process by her own hand.
A speech to bankers is fair game. Internal work product and discussions of strategy should not be. But I understand that since Trump is strea-of-consciousness in his approach his truthfulness and predator sexual practices are irrelevantDo I really need to point out the difference between speech by a private citizen vs. speech by a public official? Particularly when that speech is directed to banks out of view of her presumptive constituents while she is simultaneously involved in policy decisions affecting those banks, accepts "donations" from said banks, and is involved in passing sensitive non-public information to said banks? If you can't see the problem with that, we have nothing more to discuss but I would urge you to look up the definitions of insider trading, quid pro quo, and pay for play.
You guys can't sing his praises as an honest bipartisan when he drops the criminal investigation of the Democratic Candidate, and then condemn him when he takes it back up when new evidence arises. Now if you have some actual evidence that he planned the timing of this specifically to ruin your Democrat's election hopes, I'm willing to evaluate it.
A speech to bankers is fair game.