Did Stein get on the ballot in more states? Last I checked if she won every state where she's on the ballot she still couldn't get 270.
Right, my point is that "math" isn't the reason Johnson is considered not to have "a chance". It's also one reason I wait until election day to vote. I'm not going to change my vote on a rumor but I would like to have all of the facts.But even so, to your point, there are more than two candidates who have a mathematical chance of winning. It's unlikely though.
I don't know why anyone believes Trump would actually support gun rights. I don't think I've ever seen such an inconsistent candidate.Probably we'll get the turd sandwich. She'll nominate another Ruth Buzzy to SCOTUS, and Heller will be overturned as soon as they can get a case bubbled up.
Thanks for the kind compliment, but it isn't hard to do...Trump is a trainweck in the same class as Hillary, there is plenty to hate.
I don't think any of the candidates "should" have won. I like Paul Ryan, and think he would be doing better Trump right now...but I don't think the general voting populace would agree.
This election has huge undercurrents of "Identity Politics" driving it. We needed a candidate that could negate Clinton's intangibles...her "checkpoints" on the Hierarchy of Oppression the which the left currently bases its "moral compass".
As cheezy as it sounds, we needed someone like Condi Rice to defeat Hillary. HRC cannot play the "woman" card, nor the "privilege" card against rice. Rice's conservative credentials are sound, and she thinks well on her feet...she's a strong opponent to the BS the left throws out, and there's something in her political portfolio for just about everyone to relate to. She's marketable and relatable...to more than just angry white men.
But she didn't run, and nobody gave Carly the credit she deserved. This Clinton thing is a juggernaut that has been building up speed for years, it requires careful planning and precise execution. The republican party seems has not had a great track record with either, if we're to be honest with ourselves. This was inevitable after a certain point.
A better candidate. Someone relatable to everyone, but holds values that ring true with a shrinking minority of Americans. I think that is a hard job, and the best qualified are probably too smart to take it. Instead we get people driven by ambition and self-image...the people asking to do that job are probably the last people we actually want doing it.
They have a small role. But let's be honest. If you respect the candidate, you aren't going to appreciate seeing them severely misrepresented. If you already dislike them, then the ridicule is food for enthusiasm. SNL has more in common with Trump behavior than either would like to admit.Chevy Chase admits HE helped to sink Ford with his bumbling character.Fey sunk Pailin.You act as is they are not flexing their political will.
I work in St.Joe County,and for being the Bastion of liberal sheeple in N.Indiana, I am not seeing that many Hillary signs and almost as many Trump's....but I am not in the Bend all that often.
So... thin skin, and a comedy show is "rigging the election"? They're saying that a lot lately, building up to the loss...
Chevy Chase admits HE helped to sink Ford with his bumbling character.Fey sunk Pailin.You act as is they are not flexing their political will.
Probably time to put up an official victim thread, where everyone can feel free to name who victimized them or their candidate and how it is someone else's fault their guy lost.
If you aren't voting third party you have no vision. This one is over and merely the second phase of Clinton family chokehold on POTUS. The only way your kids won't be standing in line to receive their mandatory President Chelsea forehead tattoo is to vote for Johnson. You do love your kids and country right?
Paul, how about blaming the party for putting up candidates people didn't like.
What? Take away the MJ and Johnson isn't too far from people named Clinton.
your list is not to far off,but the last three should be Kasich ,Huck,and Graham at the Very bottom.Two words. "Rick" "Perry". THAT would have been better than DJT.
17 candidates competed for the nomination. This is probably how I would rank them as it stand now.
Rand Paul
Scott Walker
Carly Fiorina
Marco Rubio
Ben Carson
Ted Cruz
John Kasich
Rick Perry
Lindsey Graham
Jim Gilmore
Mike Huckabee
Bobby Jindal
Jeb Bush
Donald Trump
Rick Santorum
Chris Christie
George Pataki
In that group are people who represent every faction in the GOP. The only exception, the alt-right aren't all that well represented other than Trump. The fullness of the GOP's diversity was available this election cycle.
Granted, there are many losers in that group, counting Trump. The basement stairs begins somewhere around Rick Perry and descends from there. So that gives a good separation between the serious candidates and the clowns. DJT is firmly placed among the clowns.
But I'm not going to blame the GOP for this. For not putting up better. As I said, it's a diverse group. I'm even going to try not to blame the Trumpers for nominating a clown. I mostly blame the ****ed up way we vote. The two-party, primary election, first-past-the-post, winner-takes-all system has produced the worst Hobson's choice I have experienced in my lifetime. Our choice is literally between a narcissistic reality TV/Real Estate tycoon, and a criminal, and most people are gonna vote for the ****ing CRIMINAL!!!