And .00001% have read it. Leaving 99.99999% deciding based on sound bites from their favorite media source or news personality.
PoliticalMath said:NYT keeping tabs of all those Jews and their Jew-y votes. Never know what Jewery they're up to. My favorite part of the NYT Jew tracker is the part where specifically track how loyal to the political party the Jews are
Brandon Morse said:Jew Tracker 9000 is now my pet name for NYT.
Just an observation but, Wow, a whole lotta white folk at Miss Sarah's party. Oh wait, look who's being removed.
Just an observation but, Wow, a whole lotta white folk at Miss Sarah's party. Oh wait, look who's being removed.
The way you phrased your "observation" smacks of an implication. That's just my observation.Not a thing, that is why I prefaced the post with "Just an observation..."
The way you phrased your "observation" smacks of an implication. That's just my observation.
Not a thing...
Pudly's answer is spot on. The 'pre/post ottoman perspective' is an illusion since the same sectarian fissures are still at work: Moslem violence against 'dhimmis' continues now as before with the exception that Christians can flee abroad and the Jews in the Arab world went to Israel. The Shia/Sunni rift is alive and kicking, like in Iraq and Yemen. Is spite of their best authoritarian efforts, many of the 'secular' regimes failed on their own to keep a lid on all this (Libya is the exception). Syria is exhibit 'A'Actually, from a post-Ottoman perspective, not really.
So, the Obama administration's one argument for the Iran Deal just died.
Iran's supreme leader bans negotiations with the United States | Reuters