I wonder if they will be supporting the poor soul that beat that cop's behind a few months back as well. They were pretty upset that the police started hanging out there in the aftermath of that.
I wonder if they will be supporting the poor soul that beat that cop's behind a few months back as well. They were pretty upset that the police started hanging out there in the aftermath of that.
Not if you are trying to legitimize the other side! Freedom of speech only works one way I guess?Officer Wilson was the victim in that incident. Supporting him would be quite constructive, indeed.
Not if you are trying to legitimize the other side! Freedom of speech only works one way I guess?
The Denver Police Protective Association recognizes all citizens’ rights to the First Amendment and the right to assemble lawfully. We do not recognize groups that continually ignore the law and expect the police to protect them while they break the law," the union said.
"This group of high school students not only broke DPS rules by leaving school without authorization, but broke laws of the City and County of Denver and State of Colorado regarding traffic regulations and the right to assemble with a permit. The DPPA recognizes citizens’ rights to assemble lawfully. This, however, was not a lawful assembly, which ultimately cost four Denver Police Officers a trip to the hospital. One of which is in critical condition," the union said.
Some "peaceful protesters" in Denver acting typically "peaceful":
Denver police union says some East High students chanted 'hit him again' when car struck officers - 7NEWS Denver TheDenverChannel.com
At least the police union there has some sense:
This is what happens when you let a bunch of lawbreakers illegally block traffic. Are you paying attention, St. Louis CPD?
I'm assuming you saw the vid of the protestors? I think this is rapidly changing from an incorrectly labeled racial issue to an anti-police issue.
I'm assuming you saw the vid of the protestors? I think this is rapidly changing from an incorrectly labeled racial issue to an anti-police issue.
The other link you posted about the hate crime in Bevo sounds made up. I'm not saying that it is, but it sure has me scratching my head.
Still early. No witnesses. I agree it has the *potential* to be fishy. I don't see any way an elderly woman would be able to pull off making up something like that - but there's the potential for embellishment.
Certainly, wait for the investigation.
She wasn't elderly (26).
Some "peaceful protesters" in Denver acting typically "peaceful":
Denver police union says some East High students chanted 'hit him again' when car struck officers - 7NEWS Denver TheDenverChannel.com
At least the police union there has some sense:
This is what happens when you let a bunch of lawbreakers illegally block traffic. Are you paying attention, St. Louis CPD?
the right to assemble with a permit. citizens’ rights to assemble lawfully. This, however, was not a lawful assembly
These laws are(permits to assemble lawfully) are in my opinion an attack on the constitution.
They tried to pass a similar type bill in Canada called Bill 78.It passed,but after nation wide protest and loss of an election based almost only on that bill it was repealed by Pauline Marois.
Permits lead to free speech zones,as we have already seen many times.A group of Americans gathered together to protest anything should not be deemed illegal activity simply because they do not have a permit.To bad that is not the America we live in currently.
The permits for assembly are only required, generally, for obstructing/taking over public spaces, or for blocking public roadways - in other words, when the exercise of first-amendment rights would infringe on the rights and lawful activities of those not involved in the assembly.
The permits for assembly are only required, generally, for obstructing/taking over public spaces, or for blocking public roadways - in other words, when the exercise of first-amendment rights would infringe on the rights and lawful activities of those not involved in the assembly.
Not true,at least in Indianapolis.If more than 250 people are to be present you need to file for a permit 90 days in advance,and must contact the police(links listed).
I have been through the entire process for a picket that did not interfere with commerce,traffic,and obeyed all pedestrian laws.
Permit Process
Picketing / Demonstrations
In the instance the event is a peaceful picketing and/or demonstration, please contact the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department. You may speak to Lt. Robert Boydston, 317-327-5379
Aside from the application fee you will need....
- A public safety contact person. The public safety contact must be a certified law enforcement officer through the Indiana Law Enforcement Academy. If you need assistance in finding an officer for a special event, you may call Sgt. Ron Brezik at 317.327.6642 or email him at ronald.brezik@indy.gov Please do not list the person(s) who are organizing the event as the safety contact. If you plan to temporarily close a street for construction, please click here for Right of Way Permit information.
- Medical assistance information
- Sample insurance information - A copy of the event insurance certificate must be submitted. The insurance must have at least one million (1,000,000) dollars of general liability insurance. The following must be listed as additional insured and a certificate holder: Consolidated City of Indianapolis, 1200 Madison Ave, Suite 100, Indianapolis, IN 46225
- Public amenities / Port-o-Let requirements
- Site-plan/walk/run route map
- Clean-up plan sample
- Emergency Action Plan (EAP) sample- If your event is cancelled or postponed due to weather, please send a courtesy call to the Special Events Office (317.327.4849)
Note that I said "generally". And there aren't very many places that you can assemble more than 250 people, and not cause the city to have to consider/address public safety concerns that may result from such an assembly.
I don't see it as an infringement on the first amendment.
Never! It doesn't fit their agenda.So what time will Obama and Holder and Sharpton be on tv condemning this attack? I don't want to miss it.