The 2020 General Election Thread II

[Ingomike]

Legal Scholar Argues that States Which Were Undecided on the Winner of the Presidential Race at Midnight Election Day Acted Outside the Constitution and Their Results Are Therefore Void

When the federal statutes speak of ‘the election’… they plainly refer to the combined actions of voters and officials meant to make a final selection of an officeholder… By establishing a particular day as ‘the day’ on which these actions must take place, the statutes simply regulate the time of the election, a matter on which the Constitution explicitly gives Congress the final say.” Foster v. Love, 522 U.S. 67, 71-72 (1997)


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...-outside-constitution-results-therefore-void/

Ff

 

[Ingomike]

Momentum seems to be going one direction...

 

[Alpo]

Momentum seems to be going one direction...

It certainly is!

 

[JettaKnight]

So I've been slogging through the Michigan testimonies... ugh.

Most of it is, "the officials were mean to me and wouldn't let me see or challenge."

Others are, "it looked like the machine was connected to the internet."

Still others are completely crazy.

 

[Ingomike]

So I've been slogging through the Michigan testimonies... ugh.

Most of it is, "the officials were mean to me and wouldn't let me see or challenge."

Others are, "it looked like the machine was connected to the internet."

Still others are completely crazy.

If they were prohibited from the ability to "see or challenge" then laws have been broken and citizens rights have been damaged. Why do you so condescendingly dismiss civil rights violations by government officials generally acting in the interests of a particular political party?

We the citizens have been told our voting systems are safe, and not connected to the Internet. In some states that is the law. There is no legitimate reason to connect to the World Wide Web with a voting machine.

Maybe you think you are being smart or cool, but making fun of regular folks, that either volunteer or work the polls for a pittance, that step forward to testify as to what they saw is just repugnant, I doubt any of the keyboard kings would look any better...

 

[Alpo]

Someone appears not to be familiar with the volunteer force of personnel associated with vote tabulation.

 

[JettaKnight]

Robin claims she got "cock blocked" because she didn't want to wear a mask correctly.


That's gotta be a first for a senate committee hearing.

 

[HoughMade]

Legal Scholar Argues that States Which Were Undecided on the Winner of the Presidential Race at Midnight Election Day Acted Outside the Constitution and Their Results Are Therefore Void

When the federal statutes speak of ‘the election’… they plainly refer to the combined actions of voters and officials meant to make a final selection of an officeholder… By establishing a particular day as ‘the day’ on which these actions must take place, the statutes simply regulate the time of the election, a matter on which the Constitution explicitly gives Congress the final say.” Foster v. Love, 522 U.S. 67, 71-72 (1997)


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/20...-outside-constitution-results-therefore-void/

Ff

What does this scholar have to say about the days when it was impossible to tally all votes on election day. It wasn't that long ago.

 

[Ingomike]

What does this scholar have to say about the days when it was impossible to tally all votes on election day. It wasn't that long ago.

Please direct your inquiry to SCOTUS, including currently sitting liberal justices...

 

[jamil]

Robin claims she got "cock blocked" because she didn't want to wear a mask correctly.


That's gotta be a first for a senate committee hearing.

I turned it off at “we live in a republic not a democracy.”

 

[JettaKnight]

What does this scholar have to say about the days when it was impossible to tally all votes on election day. It wasn't that long ago.

Am I reading that right - someone (who the article doesn't identify!) thinks that the only way an election can be valid is if it's decided within six hours after the polls close?






The term "scholar" seems to be rather generous.


At least the author is somewhat consistent with his claims: Jander Research: PA CASE THAT SHOWS CERTIFICATION DOES NOT EXTEND DEADLINE.

 

[T.Lex]

What does this scholar have to say about the days when it was impossible to tally all votes on election day. It wasn't that long ago.

Hey Hough, maybe you can ask a SCOTUS justice about that the next time you dine with one.

 

[Ingomike]

Hey Hough, maybe you can ask a SCOTUS justice about that the next time you dine with one.

There was a case decided by SCOTUS that defined "election day" do you see a different definition?

 

[Alpo]

I turned it off at “we live in a republic not a democracy.”

Me too. How can a woman get "blocked"? Is "they" tranny?

 

[Alpo]

Please direct your inquiry to SCOTUS, including currently sitting liberal justices...

If I was a Supreme....I'd sing...oh wrong group.

IF I was a Supreme, I would ask: Why only these 4 states? What happened in the rest of the country? Why is your suit directed only at these 4 entities? Weren't you potentially harmed by 49 states? Why don't we just throw out the WHOLE ****ING ELECTION AND GO AHEAD AND LET THE SUPREME COURT APPOINT....Alpo? You miserable idiot.

 

[Alpo]

There was a case decided by SCOTUS that defined "election day" do you see a different definition?

Hey Mike! Watch out! Mike...back away from the edge....

MIIIIIIKE!!!

Yeah, that old momentum be rollin' now....

 

[HoughMade]

If the point is that the votes cast on (or by) election day are all that count, sure. That the count of those votes has to be completed that day, once and for all,...I'm going to need some precedent that actually says that.

 

[printcraft]

If I was a Supreme....I'd sing...oh wrong group.

IF I was a Supreme, I would ask: Why only these 4 states? What happened in the rest of the country? Why is your suit directed only at these 4 entities? Weren't you potentially harmed by 49 states? Why don't we just throw out the WHOLE ****ING ELECTION AND GO AHEAD AND LET THE SUPREME COURT APPOINT....Alpo? You miserable idiot.

Quoting for posterity.

 

[Alpo]

Quoting for posterity.

Yeah. I know why you quoted it.

Back to the Single A league again.

 

[Ingomike]

If I was a Supreme....I'd sing...oh wrong group.

IF I was a Supreme, I would ask: Why only these 4 states? What happened in the rest of the country? Why is your suit directed only at these 4 entities? Weren't you potentially harmed by 49 states? Why don't we just throw out the WHOLE ****ING ELECTION AND GO AHEAD AND LET THE SUPREME COURT APPOINT....Alpo? You miserable idiot.

Um, that would be unconstitutional, but SCOTUS declaring the whole election tainted by constitutional issues, fraud, and compromised equipment and void and throwing it to the house for a one vote per state delegation election would not be...