STARTING A TREND: Women Posing For Pictures With Guns To Support Open Carry Pt 2

[actaeon277]

 

[actaeon277]

 

[actaeon277]

 

[actaeon277]

This one doesn't have a gun, but it's my favorite

 

[frenchiectfd2203]

Here is a link to the entire 20 second video.

https://www.angryduck.com/pics/just-shooting-for-fun.html

20 seconds of pure bliss.!!

 

[STFU]

Well, I hesitated to put Sophia Bush on here. She's a gun owner, but a Fudd.
Probably the most we could hope for out of California.
She's said things like, she thinks we need better gun laws, because you shouldn't be able to buy guns online.
And apparently said something about Pres. Trump trying to make it too easy to get suppressors. Not sure what that was about.

But, what the heck.
We didn't check the politics of the other girls, so..

Looks like she just wants to"hold a gun." So I would happy to let her hold...

 

[rhino]

It's unlikely that all (or maybe even most) of the models depicted in the photos in this topic agree with most of us on gun rights. But, when you have actual evidence that they do not . . . it definitely makes the photo less effective to "support open carry."

 

[indiucky]

 

[Agrv8r]

I don’t hate this thread, at all.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[OakRiver]

 

[actaeon277]

It's unlikely that all (or maybe even most) of the models depicted in the photos in this topic agree with most of us on gun rights. But, when you have actual evidence that they do not . . . it definitely makes the photo less effective to "support open carry."

I can't watch Parks and Recreation anymore because Nick Offerman's anti-gun speech keeps popping in my head.

 

[churchmouse]

I can't watch Parks and Recreation anymore because Nick Offerman's anti-gun speech keeps popping in my head.

Never did watch it.

 

[actaeon277]

Never did watch it.

[video=youtube;gVcS_9cad8g]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gVcS_9cad8g[/video]

 

[actaeon277]

If you go on youtube so you can look at the comments, people commented that he didn't "destroy gun nuts", and they pointed out errors in what he says.

 

[OakRiver]

 

[OakRiver]

 

[rhino]

If you go on youtube so you can look at the comments, people commented that he didn't "destroy gun nuts", and they pointed out errors in what he says.

When I see "destroys" in the title of a youtube video, I now assume that no one destroyed anyone. I've watched too many videos waiting for the destroying to happen and then was left hanging. I don't know if it's just "click bait" or if confirmation bias and wishful thinking are so strong that the person posting the video actually believes that the person on their side destroyed the other side.

 

[STFU]

When I see "destroys" in the title of a youtube video, I now assume that no one destroyed anyone. I've watched too many videos waiting for the destroying to happen and then was left hanging. I don't know if it's just "click bait" or if confirmation bias and wishful thinking are so strong that the person posting the video actually believes that the person on their side destroyed the other side.

You said it...click bait. I [STRIKE]watched[/STRIKE] wasted 45 seconds...and I want them back.
What a flake.

 

[WebSnyper]

 

[Leadeye]

Over the top while still under the shirt.