Sandy Hook Shooting Fully Exposed Gone Viral!

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • mydoghasfleas

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    13   0   0
    Nov 19, 2011
    1,082
    38
    Undisclosed
    If the white house gave reports on the presidents daily Bowel Movement, we should question its accuracy. Not care, but still not trust its validity.

    To not question events, especially of this nature, would be naiveté.

    Even if afterwords you draw the conclusion that there is nothing underhanded or nefarious, at least you didnt waste your right to question your overlords. Enjoy it while you still allegedly have it. Former Marine Detained By FBI For Facebook Posts About 9/11 And 'The Revolution' - Business Insider

    People used to say "I may not like what you have to say, but I would die to protect your right to say it". I guess thats becoming a thing of the past.

    A gov conspiracy does not involve all of the gov. They do not all have to be in on it, its compartmentalized. How many alphabet agencys do we have now anyway?
    Government is big. REALLY BIG. They left hand doesnt know what the right hand is doing.
    Further, it is made up mostly of people who are really good at manipulating and lying, after all, thats how most got there.

    Conspiricy theory are just that, "theorys". It doesnt matter if they are %99 incorrect, what matters is if they are %1 correct.
    To find that %1 you may have to sift through %99 made up BS and photoshoped pictures. But if you dont, you will never find the truth, whatever that may be.
     

    IndyDave1776

    Grandmaster
    Emeritus
    Rating - 100%
    12   0   0
    Jan 12, 2012
    27,286
    113
    If you want instant, buy some Quaker oatmeal. Investigations don't work like that. Criminal justice agencies don't exist to give you instant answers so you can thump your chest about false flag operations on the internet.

    What makes the difference, anyway? Even when a fairly quick answer is given, like the characterization of rifle wounds by the medical examiner, people only believe it if it fits their personal "theory."

    I guess that's the problem with these law enforcement agencies. They are filled with incompetent know-nothings, while the people who really know how to do the job are busy holding steering wheels and nursing their second careers as uncompensated online political scientists.

    OK, you're right. I am being completely unreasonable expecting the f**king retards to manage to count to 4 in under a month, especially when the biggest political issue of the year hinges on information they should have had at the very least within an hour of arrival.
     

    lucky4034

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    13   0   0
    Jan 14, 2012
    3,789
    48
    Whats interesting is no one is willing to even explore any conspiracy that proposes government involvement in murder....

    Yet, question whether or not Obama is a citizen, or that Benghazi was a shady event that this administration is trying to cover up and EVERY REPUBLICAN is willing to jump on that train.

    It makes you wonder why.. Is it simply too scary to consider? Or is it a case where one is more likely to consider a conspiracy if it is self serving?.... OR is it because the media tells you what to believe... and if you are a follower of Faux News, and Faux News tells you that Obama isn't a citizen and that Benghazi was a cover up... then it must be true or at least an option worth exploring?
     

    Glocker 400

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 17, 2013
    119
    16
    OK, you're right. I am being completely unreasonable expecting the f**king retards to manage to count to 4 in under a month, especially when the biggest political issue of the year hinges on information they should have had at the very least within an hour of arrival.

    Of course I'm right. Once again, your gratification is not the goal. Neither are political considerations. This might shock you, but there are people who don't run everything in their personal or professional lives through a political filter. These people are referred to as "normal."

    :):
     

    IndyDave1776

    Grandmaster
    Emeritus
    Rating - 100%
    12   0   0
    Jan 12, 2012
    27,286
    113
    Of course I'm right. Once again, your gratification is not the goal. Neither are political considerations. This might shock you, but there are people who don't run everything in their personal or professional lives through a political filter. These people are referred to as "normal."

    :):

    Yes, and there are people who are content to take whatever they are spoon-fed and be happy with it. These people are referred to as f**king idiots.
     

    Glocker 400

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 17, 2013
    119
    16
    Yes, and there are people who are content to take whatever they are spoon-fed and be happy with it. These people are referred to as f**king idiots.

    There's a big space between taking "spoon fed" information at face value and automatically jumping to "massive conspiracy" red alert status. Sane people know this. Delusional people respond with anger and curse words when something that doesn't mesh with their worldview confronts them.

    I would imagine that anger control issues will be a valid criteria for the denial of firearms rights if new gun control legislation is passed in the future. Might want to look into some Xanax or something.
     

    IndyDave1776

    Grandmaster
    Emeritus
    Rating - 100%
    12   0   0
    Jan 12, 2012
    27,286
    113
    There's a big space between taking "spoon fed" information at face value and automatically jumping to "massive conspiracy" red alert status. Sane people know this. Delusional people respond with anger and curse words when something that doesn't mesh with their worldview confronts them.

    I would imagine that anger control issues will be a valid criteria for the denial of firearms rights if new gun control legislation is passed in the future. Might want to look into some Xanax or something.

    Come back and talk to me when you grow up.
     

    Glocker 400

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 17, 2013
    119
    16
    Where did you get that?

    How about the same scrutiny I get for the privilege of driving a truck? Seriously, I have had to produce an original birth certificate, and original Social Security card, two separate FBI background checks in addition to proving competency and passing a physical every two years--and I don't get even get an army or any nukes.

    You forgot you drive a truck? I have read more than one thread here, even though I don't feel the need to post in every single one.
     

    buckstopshere

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    93   0   0
    Jan 18, 2010
    3,693
    48
    Greenwood
    Where did you get that?

    Yo, Dave:

    5a4a1fbc9b2a00eee728683ec3deb058.jpg


    This guy is being a douche in almost all his posts. He is ok with some socialism (see link below)and his comments demonstrate his agenda on this board.

    https://www.indianagunowners.com/fo...2nd_best_country_2_live_in-4.html#post3753660
     

    Glocker 400

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 17, 2013
    119
    16
    Yo, Dave:

    5a4a1fbc9b2a00eee728683ec3deb058.jpg


    This guy is being a douche in almost all his posts. He is ok with some socialism (see link below)and his comments demonstrate his agenda on this board.

    https://www.indianagunowners.com/fo...2nd_best_country_2_live_in-4.html#post3753660

    Sorry that a differing opinion is considered "trolling" to you. News flash....the entire world doesn't think exactly alike, and this includes people who happen to own guns.

    Wanna see some pics of my guns? I'll show you mine if you show me yours. :):
     

    IndyDave1776

    Grandmaster
    Emeritus
    Rating - 100%
    12   0   0
    Jan 12, 2012
    27,286
    113
    You forgot you drive a truck? I have read more than one thread here, even though I don't feel the need to post in every single one.

    OK, so you are merging two entirely different thoughts. Apparently you find it reasonable that we have higher standards of verification for official permission to engage in mundane tasks than for being entrusted with the highest office in our nation. Personally, I would be more concerned about the person who is in a position to do more than any one other person to destroy the republic. I fail to understand what this has to do with the inability of the police to ascertain the most basic information from what should be a relatively self-explanatory situation.

    I have noticed that you like assigning thoughts to others. For example, you have apparently decided that I subscribe to the Sandy Hook narrative furthest removed from the official story. I explored the most remote workable theory first and foremost to establish that it could be made to work. I never claimed it as a conclusion. I do, however, feel secure in the notion that we have been fed a significant amount of disinformation both incidentally to the media feeding frenzy and assorted people taking advantage for political gain. We won't know the truth until we find it, but then again, you will never find it if you make up your mind ahead of time what you are willing to accept as truth.

    Before you discount anything, you may want to consider that in one of the most egregious incidents of this general nature, Nero had an entire demographic banished from Rome over a fire that he had ordered set in order to simultaneously clear a portion of Rome that he wanted for a new palace complex and justify intensifying the persecution of Christians to the point of blanket banishment. That is a far more audacious operation than the most extreme potential situation my imagination can fathom pertaining to Sandy Hook, and it did happen, and it happened approximately 2000 years ago with far fewer resources than are available to the modern US government.

    Then again, you may wish to refrain from considering such things. If my suspicions are correct, you may well be too dependent on seeing a nice pretty world full of unicorns and rainbows. I really would hate to intrude on such happiness, questionable foundation notwithstanding.
     

    Glocker 400

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 17, 2013
    119
    16
    Then again, you may wish to refrain from considering such things. If my suspicions are correct, you may well be too dependent on seeing a nice pretty world full of unicorns and rainbows. I really would hate to intrude on such happiness, questionable foundation notwithstanding.

    And you may well be too dependent on your world of oppression, doom and ulterior motives. Psychology is an interesting field. Some people are absolutely miserable, unless of course they are miserable.

    Have fun with your "theories." A grain of sand in the desert, it is.
     

    buckstopshere

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    93   0   0
    Jan 18, 2010
    3,693
    48
    Greenwood
    Sorry that a differing opinion is considered "trolling" to you. News flash....the entire world doesn't think exactly alike, and this includes people who happen to own guns.

    Wanna see some pics of my guns? I'll show you mine if you show me yours. :):

    I have no problems with differing opinions.

    You're new to this forum, you come in at a time when there is much debate regarding our rights, when the anti gunner liberal's have a call to action to discredit law abiding gun owners as loon's and you are argumentative with people who have good reputation in your posts. Top it off, you admit to socialism not being a bad thing.

    I think you're a troll. Hope you prove me wrong.

    I don't care what guns you have. Any idiot can father a child, any socialist can own a gun in this country.
     

    Indy60

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Nov 10, 2012
    848
    18
    Central IN
    This right here.

    What an embarrassing thread. :rolleyes:

    Anyone looking for concrete evidence that a good number of gun owners are firmly unhinged from reality and in need of strict regulation will find a gold mine here. A whole town paid to keep quiet in a government conspiracy? 20 dead children are really alive and being hidden by the government?

    This is some real "next level" lunacy right here.

    Geez!
     

    UncleMike

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Dec 30, 2009
    7,454
    48
    NE area of IN
    I have no problems with differing opinions.

    You're new to this forum, you come in at a time when there is much debate regarding our rights, when the anti gunner liberal's have a call to action to discredit law abiding gun owners as loon's and you are argumentative with people who have good reputation in your posts. Top it off, you admit to socialism not being a bad thing.

    I think you're a troll. Hope you prove me wrong.

    I don't care what guns you have. Any idiot can father a child, any socialist can own a gun in this country.
    Yup...:yesway:
     

    ATM

    will argue for sammiches.
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    30   0   0
    Jul 29, 2008
    21,019
    83
    Crawfordsville
    The Connecticut State Police released a statement on January 18th attempting to clarify the confusion generated by the inconsistent and irresponsible media reporting following the Sandy Hook elementary shooting in Newtown on December 14th.

    The released list of weapons sets the record straight on an issue that has driven the blogosphere to increasingly speculative lengths: exactly which weapons were used in the shooting?

    #1. Bushmaster .223 caliber– model XM15-E2S rifle with high capacity 30 round clips...

    Right. :rolleyes:

    Looks like the Connecticut State Police didn't even bother to rewrite the copy they were handed.

    I wonder who really wrote that.
     
    Top Bottom