Robbery stopped by firearms instructor

[STEEL CORE]

Yep if one of those misbeguided underprivileged "yutes" would have been harmed there would have been an uproar, but if a patron had been killed, we would not have this many post replies.

 

[BehindBlueI's]

Yep if one of those misbeguided underprivileged "yutes" would have been harmed there would have been an uproar, but if a patron had been killed, we would not have this many post replies.

I've yet to see this in Indianapolis.

 

[Joniki]

I've yet to see this in Indianapolis.

Not here in murder city either.

 

[stephen87]

I've yet to see this in Indianapolis.

Not here in murder city either.

Which is a good thing. Let's keep it that way.

 

[gglass]

As far as we know, he was acting under no authority. If you have a clear avenue of escape you must take it to claim self defense. I am not saying he is wrong, or that I wouldn't have done the same thing, but from the facts I see in the article, a good case could be made that he didn't meet the requirements of a self defense shooting. Again, in this venue, under these circumstances he is good. In different areas, or if someone else would have been hurt, not so much. IAMAL, YMMV, etc.

This might just be the most backward post I have read this year concerning someone's understanding of Indiana Gun Laws.