But why do you need to decock it? I think there's more risk of catching the hammer on something or accidentally releasing it during the decocking process than there is of pulling the trigger on a gun with a hidden hammer.
What are your reasons for this preference? Unless you practice ALOT at the range and get used to quickly cocking the pistol and firing DA, then a subsequent SA, under stress you risk harming others than the BG. SA/DA is fine if you practice with that harder trigger at the range, but otherwise I'd just say stick with a good no-safeties-ready-to-go DOA such as a Glock, Kel-
Tec, etc, for personal defense - nothing to hinder you in a sudden draw.
The long heavy trigger pull every time is the only safety,like a Kel-Tec P-11. Not a bad idea in a crisis situation. If your used to the trigger pull, you don't have to think about taking off a safety.
Apparently one of us is mis-informed.
I'm not sure what my budget is, it depends how my significant other is feelingJason,
What's your budget? You sort of get at it a bit in your OP, but that would help narrow things down.
The 'classic' SIGs, for example, have exactly the type of action you want DA/SA w/decocker, but are on the more expensive end of things. The P229 is a little longer and significantly heavier than the PK380 to which you're comparing things. Frankly, I don't consider it very "compact". Of the striker pistols mentioned, the CW9 and G19 are fairly close in physical size to the PK380 (the CW9 is lighter and narrower) and are less expensive, but don't have the action you prefer.
That'd be you. Glocks and some other striker fired designs don't fit into the classic mechanical definitions of "single action" and "double action." Some, you might say, are "partially cocked" and you finish the job with the trigger, others are more like the traditional DA, but with lower trigger pull weights.
Glocks have kind of an "in between" action, as it were, although I can understand the confusion since they have relatively light trigger pulls compared to DA handguns.
You may perfer a certain action because that's what you're comfortable with or prefer, but it's important to realize that all these modern designs from reputable mfgs are safe to carry with a round chambered.
That describes it, although I might be able to go above $500 for the right pistol.So, you want a DA/SA, hammer fired 9mm (preferably with a decocker) about the size of a Walther PK380 for less than $500. Does that describe it?
Would you settle for a safety lever that's also a decocker, but once it's decocked you carry with the "safety" off?
I don't need the safety, I just wanna be able to carry chambered, hammer down, using the double action pull for the first shot.The Bersa Thunder 9 comes close, although its 3+ oz. heavier than the PK380. The safety can be used to decock the hammer. And, it's in your price range - new.
http://www.bersafirearmsusa.com/pdf/manual45940.pdf
The classic SIGs have a decocker only, no manual safety. Revolvers don't have so-called "safety" levers, and DA/SA autos don't need them either - for the same reason - the long heavy first trigger pull.
BTW - lots of autos have a decocker and no "safety" lever.
I like the price point of the bersa a lot better, but thanks for the suggestion.I have enjoyed people telling you what you should buy, instead of giving you suggestions that fit your stated wishes Folks, the world won't frigging end just because some folks don't like striker fired guns! The triggers on them flat out suck wind, and not everyone wants to carry around what is, in effect, a single action gun with a long crappy trigger and no manual safety. It'll be OK, that's why they make different kinds of guns!
For the record, I also like the DA/SA guns. Depending on your budget, one gun you may wish to check out is the Sig 239. If you can find a used one, a S&W 3913 is a very nice gun, though the hammers are bobbed so you can't cock it for the first shot if you wish.