OK- at this point, I think the speculation and unsourced reports are crossing a line.
A polite request- reel it back in and wait until there is something reliable before assigning these kinds of motives.
eh...its the internet, i can speculate
OK- at this point, I think the speculation and unsourced reports are crossing a line.
A polite request- reel it back in and wait until there is something reliable before assigning these kinds of motives.
Originally Posted by Mgderf It'll end up being some stupid little crap. It always is.
Something similar happened when I worked at Purdue. A student shot a student guidance counselor. I can't recall if he died or not, but something says no.
This incident was over being turned in to the police department for smoking pot in the dorms.
They shooter in this case thought the counselor had "ruined his life".
It's ALWAYS something stupid.
Originally Posted by Kirk Freeman
Mg, he died. Shotgun slug at muzzle contact.
I did the prosecution of the co-conspirator.
Times Get Harder For Dorm-room Monitors - Chicago Tribune
"The shooter was from my neighborhood. Didn't know him or his family, though. "
Student counselor caught undergrad dealing drugs, said he was going to turn him in. U-grad got a shotgun, killed counselor, then himself.
I knew family of the U-grad student. Good family, but kid got caught up in trafficking. Very tragic when drugs can take over lives.
OK- at this point, I think the speculation and unsourced reports are crossing a line.
A polite request- reel it back in and wait until there is something reliable before assigning these kinds of motives.
eh...its the internet, i can speculate
How would it be the students fault? They expect that Purdue University will provide a safe environment for them.
It's obvious that Purdue can't do that, so it's Purdue's fault.
I do believe he is.
Why - would that be a problem?
They just had a school shooting and that just proves that their security is less than worthless on campus.
So yes - bringing your own protection should be mandatory for staff and students as well as guests.
We already know it's NOT illegal.
It's school property - just not K-12 - which is how we judge things since that's how firearm laws are set.Can we stop saying "school shooting", in reference to a simple homicide that happened to be on a campus?
This is not school property
Did the army provide a safe environment for those killed at Ft Hood? I've seen it argued many times here that soldiers in the barracks should be disarmed and regardless of how stupid a rule is, we signed up for it and therefore must live with it. When it comes to the military, nothing is better than status quo.
These students knew of the rule when they became students. They didn't have to attend. Courts have ruled that the police have no legal obligation to protect you so how is it that a university does?
How many are ok with the status quo of disarming soldiers and advocate for campus carry? The argument for disarming soldiers has always been lack of maturity and alcohol. As if those aren't issues with college students.
Ditto.I was a freshman at Purdue when that happened.
Can we stop saying "school shooting", in reference to a simple homicide that happened to be on a campus?
This is not school property
It's school property - just not K-12 - which is how we judge things since that's how firearm laws are set.
"School shooting" doesn't really have a good definition - just like "assault weapon".
...It's school property - just not K-12 - which is how we judge things since that's how firearm laws are set.
"School shooting" doesn't really have a good definition - just like "assault weapon".
Not me. I think those soldiers should be allowed to carry firearms every day if they so choose.
FYI, U of Oklahoma now reporting a shooting
eh...its the internet, i can speculate