Heck, I like a good joke...but jokes, especially in the political realm, usually, must point out some sort of truth to be funny, or, if not funny....to make you think.
For instance:
Here, we see commentary on a less than strong response to the killing of a journalist. Like it or not, there's enough of an underlying truth to make you think.
In contrast:
No basis in truth, it's just fodder for the echo chamber and not funny or meaningful.
The truly thin skinned will see anything that criticizes Trump in any way as offensive or whatever.
However, if the cartoon has no basis in truth....that's worth pointing out and whining about people pointing that out is, in itself, seeking a safe space.
...and do you know how hard it was to find a Trump cartoon with anything vaguely fact-based in it?
We should have nuked Saudi Arabia.
We should have nuked Saudi Arabia.
writing 1 op-ed in WaPo doesn't make you a journalist.
Potentially words AND pictures (my favorite kind of reading actually ).Words.
Yeah, but Bill has deserted us.
Starting? Been that way since the usual thread mucker showed up.