Being in engineering of some form all my life, I tend to start thinking of how to implement ideas when I hear them. So I’m thinking of this problem. One idea is pontoons with some kind of flexible captive rail so the track can move with the tide and wavesnog sure how to solve tsunamis. The train itself would of course have to be completely submersible. Well that’s obviously a bad idea. Scratch it. Too impractical. Materials don’t really exist to make a flexible rail that’s strong enough.
Okay, so a tube that floats on the water. The tube would have to be pretty flexible to be able to move with the ocean—wait. Scratch that. Not practical. That doesn’t really solve the problems with the flexible rail.
Okay, the tube would have to be uber strong and rigid and follow the contour of the ocean floor. Wait. Scratch that. The tube would have to be exceptionally strong to withstand the extreme pressures. Not to mention it has to be constructed by someone or something that can also withstand the pressures in the dealest parts of the ocean.
Okay, tunnel under the ocean floor! That’s IT! Dig a 2500 mile tunnel under the ocsan floor! Of course it would have to withstand volcanic and seismic action. But I think it’s totally doable. I mean hey, they built a tunnel under the English Channel. How much harder and more expensive could it be to dig one under the Pacific Ocean?
Think of how many jobs that would create. What an economic boon that would be!
Seriously, this is the reason why progressives need conservatives. They need someone to tell them how full of **** they are so they don’t go off soing stupid ****.
And it has to be able to cope with the shifting of tectonic plates.Being in engineering of some form all my life, I tend to start thinking of how to implement ideas when I hear them. So I’m thinking of this problem. One idea is pontoons with some kind of flexible captive rail so the track can move with the tide and wavesnog sure how to solve tsunamis. The train itself would of course have to be completely submersible. Well that’s obviously a bad idea. Scratch it. Too impractical. Materials don’t really exist to make a flexible rail that’s strong enough.
Okay, so a tube that floats on the water. The tube would have to be pretty flexible to be able to move with the ocean—wait. Scratch that. Not practical. That doesn’t really solve the problems with the flexible rail.
Okay, the tube would have to be uber strong and rigid and follow the contour of the ocean floor. Wait. Scratch that. The tube would have to be exceptionally strong to withstand the extreme pressures. Not to mention it has to be constructed by someone or something that can also withstand the pressures in the dealest parts of the ocean.
Okay, tunnel under the ocean floor! That’s IT! Dig a 2500 mile tunnel under the ocsan floor! Of course it would have to withstand volcanic and seismic action. But I think it’s totally doable. I mean hey, they built a tunnel under the English Channel. How much harder and more expensive could it be to dig one under the Pacific Ocean?
Think of how many jobs that would create. What an economic boon that would be!
Seriously, this is the reason why progressives need conservatives. They need someone to tell them how full of **** they are so they don’t go off soing stupid ****.
What a stunning failure of imagination, jamil
View attachment 74573 View attachment 74574 View attachment 74575 View attachment 74576
Just hook a few of these together and you have a sea train! We just hand wave the problems of tethering, aerodynamic or hydrodynamic interference, the intermittent nature of wind and solar, and the fact that insufficient power to reliably move one ship will not be improved by hooking several together. Maybe we can put the farting cows on board and somehow use the methane (without burning it, of course!) to drive a fuel cell or something
And it has to be able to cope with the shifting of tectonic plates.
Train to Hawaii? Don't laugh. When I was in Iraq there were 3 overpasses in the desert. No roads, to towns no goat trails. Three very nice pavement and concrete bridges over a small piece of asphalt. Talk about a bridge to nowhere!!!!!
NOT. FAST. ENOUGH.
And there are no rails involved. It's supposed to be a high speed RAIL system. So. Tunnel under the ocean floor. Pump in unicorn farts to prepel the train cars through the tunnel like a spitball through a straw. And let the PITA folks **** the unicorns to get their buy in. THAT'S the plan.
What a stunning failure of imagination, jamil
View attachment 74573 View attachment 74574 View attachment 74575 View attachment 74576
Just hook a few of these together and you have a sea train! We just hand wave the problems of tethering, aerodynamic or hydrodynamic interference, the intermittent nature of wind and solar, and the fact that insufficient power to reliably move one ship will not be improved by hooking several together. Maybe we can put the farting cows on board and somehow use the methane (without burning it, of course!) to drive a fuel cell or something
Of course unicorn farts weaken or destroy the laws of physics. That’s what turns such a small volume of unicorn gas into a fast stream nearly endless wind that can propel train cars 2500 miles through a tube buried under the ocean.But... but... the unicorn farts weaken or completely degrade the laws of physics! The more power you add, the faster you go. SeaTrains can be as fast as we want! :stampy footy:
A dual pneumatic tube, one west and one east.
Submerged like a submarine at 100 feet below sea level with automatically controlled ballast tanks.
It could be made from recycled ocean plastic.
It could not only link mainland US and Hawaii, but we could run tubes to Great Britain, France and Spain.
They would be clear and have links to sonar that would alert you to points of interest like sea life, submarines and such.
Hollywood would make movies like Murder on the Hawaii Express, Tube Force One, and the remake of The Taking of Pelham 123.
Tubes are normally run by pneumatic pressure so the sender would blow.