Political funny picture thread, part 3

[actaeon277]

 

[indiucky]

 

[Jerchap2]

 

[Jerchap2]

By all accounts, LBJ was a despicable pervert.

 

[Jerchap2]

 

[Jerchap2]

 

[IndyTom]

I had the same thought, but a narrow ruling means it applied to the specifics of that case, not the general idea behind it. This isn't a win for religiously held beliefs, it was a win for a guy who was abused by the board for his beliefs.

 

[Jerchap2]

To be fair, though, had the vote gone the other way, the left would be shouting from the rooftops and NOT characterizing it as narrow but as a win for their anti-Christian agenda. Also, as written, it is misleading and possibly grammatically incorrect to say the court ruled narrowly when it was 7-2. It would require another sentence to explain how the ruling applied to a narrow set of circumstances.

 

[indiucky]

 

[indiucky]

 

[IndyTom]

To be fair, though, had the vote gone the other way, the left would be shouting from the rooftops and NOT characterizing it as narrow but as a win for their anti-Christian agenda. Also, as written, it is misleading and possibly grammatically incorrect to say the court ruled narrowly when it was 7-2. It would require another sentence to explain how the ruling applied to a narrow set of circumstances.

Don't get me wrong, I was watching the news on TV and Fox even called it a narrow ruling which confused me with the whole 7-2 decision (I even told my son, 5-4 is narrow, 7-2 is not). I had to look into it more to see it is standard jargon/legalese for such things that is certainly unclear to people who haven't learned of the meaning behind it. It is proper reporting using proper legal terminology, but they should specify the meaning of narrow that they are using.

 

[Kutnupe14]

Uhhh... here's the original article... The word "narrowly" doesn't appear.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/04/poli...do-gay-marriage-cake-supreme-court/index.html

Further, if the above image was actually legit, the word "narrowly," should have been braced by commas. Seems like someone was cooking the books.

 

[d.kaufman]

Uhhh... here's the original article... The word "narrowly" doesn't appear.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/04/poli...do-gay-marriage-cake-supreme-court/index.html

Further, if the above image was actually legit, the word "narrowly," should have been braced by commas. Seems like someone was cooking the books.

"Todays decision is remarkably narrow" right in the article you posted a link to

 

[Kutnupe14]

"Todays decision is remarkably narrow" right in the article you posted a link to

Not sure if srs.... or don't understand what was being said. "Narrow" is used to convey how the ruling doesn't have many applications outside of this particular case.

 

[printcraft]

Not sure if srs.... or don't understand what was being said. "Narrow" is used to convey how the ruling doesn't have many applications outside of this particular case.

[FONT=&amp]By Ariane de Vogue, CNN Supreme Court Reporter[/FONT]
[FONT=&amp]Updated 5:01 PM ET, Mon June 4, 2018[/FONT]

Should we use "shadow" updated?

 

[Route 45]

 

[spencer rifle]

It's square dancing....

Right hand star.

 

[Ingomike]

And the cats would if they put a tax on cat food...

M

 

[Jerchap2]

 

[Jerchap2]