Brians Surplus

Police: Shooting at Muhammad cartoon contest in Texas

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!

    • Register Log in
    ModernGunner

    ModernGunner

    Shooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 29, 2010
    4,749
    63
    NWI
    Kutnupe14 said:
    It's 100% an anti- Islam and event, and something I expect from the guys of Stormfront to put on. It's offensive, distasteful speech (and 100% protected). Pictures of the prophet at offensive to followers of that particular faith, so when non-followers creates such images, they are purposefully being offensive. They may think this is a thumbing their nose at radicals with this act, but in the process, they are offending ALL believers of that faith.

    Thumbs down for anyone who participated in this event.
    Click to expand...
    Anyone can claim to be 'offended' at anything.

    Many people claim to be 'offended' simply to further their own hateful agenda. Feigned 'indignance' is the sole burden of the person carrying it, and no other(s).

    There is NO 'Constitutional right' NOT to be offended. There appear to be folks that forget this simple fact.

    There were innumerable images and video clips of libtards holding "Kill George Bush" signs and effigies of him being hung, etc.. That's not only offensive to some, that is specifically 'hate speech', which ISN'T protected.

    Was ANYONE ever prosecuted for that? No. One can only imagine the protests, the demand for prosecutions, perhaps the riots, looting, and burnings that might take place if people were to carry such signs and effigies regarding the Liar-In-Chief.

    Because none were, that 'set the tone', for others to follow. 'Funny' how those who so ardently defended that hate speech regarding Bush are so quick to jump on the bandwagon when their group or viewpoints, or those with which they empathize, come under the same type of 'attack'.

    The fact of the matter is, regardless of who one is, someone out there will not like that person for some reason. Could be any number of things, or some combination of things. Is that 'fair'? Well, if it's fair for one group to do it, then it's fair for any group to do it.

    And because some folks seem to forget (and folks who SHOULD know better), the First Amendment protects the speech, NOT of those with which we agree, but of those with which we most vehemently disagree. That's the discipline.

    Welcome to the real world.
     
    Mr Evilwrench

    Mr Evilwrench

    Quantum Mechanic
    Emeritus
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Aug 18, 2011
    11,560
    63
    Carmel
    Google must not be my friend :( Let's see a reference to Pamela Geller dressed as Hitler. I just don't see that happening. You do know she's all Jewish and stuff, right? You're not presuming Naziism to be a phenomenon of the right wing, are you? That would be wrong, too. She's just challenging what she sees as lies from CAIR etc, and the way the leftstream media eat it up. I happen to see her point.
     
    K

    Kutnupe14

    Troll Emeritus
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 13, 2011
    40,294
    149
    ModernGunner said:
    Anyone can claim to be 'offended' at anything.

    Many people claim to be 'offended' simply to further their own hateful agenda. Feigned 'indignance' is the sole burden of the person carrying it, and no other(s).

    There is NO 'Constitutional right' NOT to be offended. There appear to be folks that forget this simple fact.

    There were innumerable images and video clips of libtards holding "Kill George Bush" signs and effigies of him being hung, etc.. That's not only offensive to some, that is specifically 'hate speech', which ISN'T protected.

    Was ANYONE ever prosecuted for that? No. One can only imagine the protests, the demand for prosecutions, perhaps the riots, looting, and burnings that might take place if people were to carry such signs and effigies regarding the Liar-In-Chief.

    Because none were, that 'set the tone', for others to follow. 'Funny' how those who so ardently defended that hate speech regarding Bush are so quick to jump on the bandwagon when their group or viewpoints, or those with which they empathize, come under the same type of 'attack'.

    The fact of the matter is, regardless of who one is, someone out there will not like that person for some reason. Could be any number of things, or some combination of things. Is that 'fair'? Well, if it's fair for one group to do it, then it's fair for any group to do it.

    And because some folks seem to forget (and folks who SHOULD know better), the First Amendment protects the speech, NOT of those with which we agree, but of those with which we most vehemently disagree. That's the discipline.

    Welcome to the real world.
    Click to expand...

    Who said she's not entitled to her speech?
     
    K

    Kutnupe14

    Troll Emeritus
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 13, 2011
    40,294
    149
    Mr Evilwrench said:
    Google must not be my friend :( Let's see a reference to Pamela Geller dressed as Hitler. I just don't see that happening. You do know she's all Jewish and stuff, right? You're not presuming Naziism to be a phenomenon of the right wing, are you? That would be wrong, too. She's just challenging what she sees as lies from CAIR etc, and the way the leftstream media eat it up. I happen to see her point.
    Click to expand...

    It sure ain't left wing. she'd probably make a good choice for the lead in a remake of the Stella Kuber story.
     
    K

    Kutnupe14

    Troll Emeritus
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 13, 2011
    40,294
    149
    Cameramonkey said:
    Someone online mentioned something interesting... Contrary to what you would expect, there were NO protestors. Why? Why wouldnt those against something so heinous (in their eyes) NOT show up to protest? Tipped off maybe?

    :tinfoil:(not sure if purple tinfoil)
    Click to expand...

    Yeah, tinfoil
     
    K

    Kutnupe14

    Troll Emeritus
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 13, 2011
    40,294
    149
    jbombelli said:
    It always has been. Most people who follow it today focus only on the racial aspects, forgetting the rest. You might as well call today's "nazis" Klan 2.0.
    Click to expand...

    The Klan and the Nazis work together nowadays. If the Klan is right wing, and the Nazis, left, how do they stand each other. Most Nazis, today, haven't a clue about the history of the movement, and if they had lived in the 30s and 40s, probably would have found themselves sterilized.
     
    jbombelli

    jbombelli

    ITG Certified
    Rating - 100%
    10   0   0
    May 17, 2008
    13,057
    113
    Brownsburg, IN
    Kutnupe14 said:
    The Klan and the Nazis work together nowadays. If the Klan is right wing, and the Nazis, left, how do they stand each other. Most Nazis, today, haven't a clue about the history of the movement, and if they had lived in the 30s and 40s, probably would have found themselves sterilized.
    Click to expand...

    I don't see the Klan as being right wing either. Racism isn't a right or left thing. It's an ***hole thing. And racist ***holes usually get along with other, similar racist ***holes.

    Edited: and you answered your own question in a way. Today's nazis aren't really nazis. They're racists who grabbed up the moniker. Nothing more. They just like that Hitler killed a few million Jews.
     
    Last edited:
    E

    Ellis

    Plinker
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 4, 2014
    40
    6
    Corydon
    Is it bad I started yelling at MSNBC for cutting off locked up abroad for the reporter saying
    "Umm" and "our affiliate station" while repeating the same thing sixty times before changing the channel..? I was really getting into the episode.
     
    You must log in or register to reply here.

    Site Supporter

    INGO Supporter

    Latest posts

    Members online

    Total: 10,211 (members: 40, guests: 10,171)

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    530,606
    Messages
    9,954,522
    Members
    54,893
    Latest member
    Michael.
    Top Bottom