Only the ones that say XD on the side.
I'll not argue that one.
I agree! Send me those god-awful things and I'll dispose of them properly.
Indeed they are. I loves me some stoopid.
^^^ ThisEver looked into what many European military forces are issued?
Hint: They're made in Austria.
Hint: Not Steyr
Do some homework Glock pistol - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaYa those never crack
Likewise there are probably issues with polymer guns that we don't even know about yet, like heat/sun sensitivity or durability. I don't see a fighting military adopting them as sidearms any time soon.
You guys are killin' me! Nice collection IG77, by the way.
Thanks.
I hope to have that "collection" down by 2 here shortly, though...
No matter how strong you believe polymers are you have to understand that a handgun with a steel slide and barrel riding on a polymer receiver is going to have a completely different recoil impulse compared to the same gun made completely from steel. Especially after you have shot most of the rounds in the magazine. As far as the analogy using modern race cars, I think the roll cages and the hardware used on the harnesses are still made from steel. As are the bolts and nuts used to attach the harness to the frame. I believe polymers have valid uses but there are many applications where there are better materials available. I think we have reached a stage where many designers are manufacturing and marketing products using unorthodox materials just because they can, not because their use actually results in a better design in terms of durability and performance. I have never bought the idea that a firearm is "better" simply because it's lighter can be mass produced at a lower manufacturing cost by injection molding. Especially when considering the prices and profit margin to the maker on most of these designs.