How can you tell there not original ? They appear to be correct when looking at other WWI 1911's ?
Here is an excellent article by the late Bill Adair, who was one of, if not the best restoration expert in the country.My biggest question is in regards to the finish since I am not exactly sure what it is or was for that matter ??
When to Restore (and when not to)
Deciding when (or why) to restore a firearm is not as complicated a matter as would be indicated by the millions of words written on the subject. "RESTORING AN ANTIQUE WILL DESTROY ITS VALUE" is the phrase most often heard; but, what if its value has already been destroyed by a previous refinishing done badly by one of the great many hacks out there (especially true in the 50's and 60's), or what if it's a pitted, rusty, brown or grey gun with numerous other problems?
Basically, if a gun is not a "collector-grade" specimen, meaning that it has less original finish than what the collector is looking for (say less than 80% as a general guide), then its collector value cannot be considered in the decision to restore or not. The exceptions are: (a) a gun with some documented historical provenance or (b) a gun of great rarity, both of which are factors that outweigh amount of finish or condition as collector-criteria.
So, if a gun is in the less-than-80%/no-provenance category, it has a value to the "accumulator" (most of us), but no real "collector" value.
Probably 95% of the guns coming into my shop are non-collector guns with little or no original finish, are often abused, pitted, gouged, dinged, prevously-overbuffed, hot-blued, cold-blued semi-wrecks in the less-than-10% category. Restoring these "bad-guns" and making them into "good guns" is what it's all about. It's either that, or let the effects of abuse and negligence eat them away until they're gone forever.
I frequently advise my customers not to "mess" with a particular gun if it happens to fall within the collector-grade range. On the other hand, if a collector-grade gun has something wrong with it, which is correctable, but which hurts the value if left uncorrected, I'll often do a partial restoration to fix that one problem.
As an example, I recently had a would-be collector-grade Colt single-action where the front sight had been filed down to nothing, and the barrel had been hit a few times in the filing process. I made a new front sight of proper shape and height, polished out the file marks and re-blued the barrel using the original nitre-blue, then "aged" it back just a little to match the rest of the gun. Could you tell? No. Did it hurt the value of the gun? No. Did it increase the value? Yes.
Flayderman has written: "Refinishing is akin to taking an 80-year-old man and dressing him in the clothes of a teenager". I couldn't disagree more if we're talking about non-collector-grade guns. It's more like taking a naked 80-year-old man and dressing him in a nice suit (even though it may not be a new-looking suit). Which would you rather look at?
What needs to be remembered is that there is a world of difference between "refinishing" and "restoration". the term "refinishing" could mean hot-bluing a single-action (where hot-blue wasn't invented till about 1937). But "restoration" means doing things right. It means doing it precisely like it was done 80 or 150 years ago by the factory. It means polishing in the exact way the factory did it, and finishing the exact way the factory did it.
There are only a handful of restoration-gunsmiths in the world who can do that... or who will do that. To that handful you can entrust your antique arms.
It was blue, but they looked black;Since this is a 1911 and not a 1911a1, I'd say that the original finish was blue.
Colt serial #400,000 to end of WWI: Very coarse blued finish causes pistols to almost appear black. These pistols are referred to as the "Black Colt" or "Black Armys". This was due to changes implemented to speed production and reduce cost. Among those was the elimination of the fine polishing step.
Have you had the stocks off the pistol, does it have the "heart" shaped cutout on the receiver?I will certainly do that tonight after work. Another thing I wanted to mention was after feild stripping it last night the the greenish/brown color is also present under the slide, and into the frame ? I was reading over at the Colt forum of another WWI pistol that had "plummed" in color as well. It looked similar to mine, but not exact.
It does have the heart shape under the grips. I also was able to ID the barrel as a High Standard I am taking it to a knowledgeable smith friend of mine tomorrow to take a look at it. Looks like a few things have been changed over the last 93 years, and it's not a collector grade piece, but on the other hand I enjoy shooting what I own, and do not look at myself as a "Collector" anyway. I took it out this evening for a function check after another close inspection for any cracks, and it killed a few beer cans just fine The gentleman I bought it from is the one who swapped the hammer because of the hammer bite issues, and is currently looking for the original one so that is a plus. I am still debating on having it refinished to it's original glory or leaving it as is. I think the pistol is worth what I paid for it, and not much more so I don't think I would be hurting the value of it anymore then it has already endured, what do you guys think ?
.I am still debating on having it refinished - what do you guys think ?
It won't devalue it anymore than it is by having a restoration done, the condition it's in currently, it's not a collectible M1911. With the Hi-Standard barrel, it well could have been arsenal reworked, not all of them were stamped as such, that could explain the greenish-gray hue the pistol has, it may have been Parkerized years ago. Something that should be remembered, buy the pistol, not the story, without documentation, it's all speculation.I have other 1911's so that isn't an issue, but I really don't think this pistol is worth much more then the $400 I paid for it. If it was all original I certainly would leave it be, but it's not. The value of this piece has already been affected from the previous repairs, replacement parts, etc. I am taking it tomorrow to someone who knows much more about it then I do, and I am going to make a decision from there. Getting rid of this pistol is not an option as I promised the original owner it would be in my possession until it gets passed down to my Son.