Nancy Pelosi's husband, Paul, 'violently assaulted' in home invasion, spokesman says

[Ingomike]

Sometimes GWP makes **** up. But the websites don’t make sense. Many sources have reported that he’s homeless. And that the far right blog was started in August. Whoever runs that blog is prolific. So he ran that from his storage container? Really?

GWP probably has this right. But I’d like to see some better sources to confirm the underwear story.

I would like to challenge you to share with us all the posts where you reply “sometimes NYT makes **** up”. Or WP and other NSM sources. While you are entitled to your opinion why just this source? A source that posts information that TPTB do not want disseminated…

 

[JCSR]

I would like to challenge you to share with us all the posts where you reply “sometimes NYT makes **** up”. Or WP and other NSM sources. While you are entitled to your opinion why just this source? A source that posts information that TPTB do not want disseminated…

I agree GWP can be a little "out there" at times. But damn a lot of their wild stories have been proven true. I always take a wait and see attitude anymore .

 

[BigRed]

View attachment 233590View attachment 233591View attachment 233592View attachment 233593
Me thinks this has exponentially more plausibility than MAGA-man bad.

In Paul's defense, being around Nasty may be what drove him to David....there's only so much a human can take

 

[JettaKnight]

Uhhh ... atheist feds trying to lecture us on un-Christian behavior doesn't exactly move the needle

Now do oaths to 'support and defend the Constitution of the United States' and the meaning of forsworn

Well, you don't listen to Christians saying it, so I'm sure an atheist doesn't move the needle.

 

[Cameramonkey]

We all know their portfolios have unprecedented returns

And if he is outpacing the undisputed Grand Wizard of Investing ( Warren Buffett), why isnt anyone pointing out how good Paul is at this game? And of course clamoring to understand how he is so good at it so they can replicate his gains. I mean, when anyone gets good at something, the #1 question they ask is "what is your secret?" Yet nobody is paying him any mind. Nobody is asking that question, as if they already know the answer.

You know, its like some rando beating Kasparov multiple times, yet nobody stops worshiping Kasparov as the all time best. They simply ignore the kid that keeps beating Kasparov, while continuing to claim he is the best chess player ever.

Its the emporer's new clothes all over again. All we need is a pesky kid to wake everyone else* up.

 

[Angrysauce]

And if he is outpacing the undisputed Grand Wizard of Investing ( Warren Buffett), why isnt anyone pointing out how good Paul is at this game? And of course clamoring to understand how he is so good at it so they can replicate his gains. I mean, when anyone gets good at something, the #1 question they ask is "what is your secret?" Yet nobody is paying him any mind. Nobody is asking that question, as if they already know the answer.

You know, its like some rando beating Kasparov multiple times, yet nobody stops worshiping Kasparov as the all time best. They simply ignore the kid that keeps beating Kasparov, while continuing to claim he is the best chess player ever.

Its the emporer's new clothes all over again. All we need is a pesky kid to wake everyone else* up.

Plenty of Twitter accounts, subreddits, etc detailing good old Paul's financial moves. They all seemingly get taken down and deleted, but I'm sure that's coincidence. Insider trading is against the law, but I guess it can't be proved the Speaker of the House is feeding her husband info. We should just keep going after r/WallstreetBets for beating the Hedge funds at there own game instead.

Silly conspiracy theories I suppose. The wealthy and politically connected are definitely not using their positions for selfish gain. They're also clearly above perverse sexual acts like clandestine homosexual prostitute solicitation and abuse of illicit drugs they condemn the prolls to cages for using.

 

[jamil]

I would like to challenge you to share with us all the posts where you reply “sometimes NYT makes **** up”. Or WP and other NSM sources. While you are entitled to your opinion why just this source? A source that posts information that TPTB do not want disseminated…

Do I have to say it every time some news outlet makes up a story? I say it when it’s relevant. We have a high profile story here where some things don’t add up. GWP reported some things that I’m not hearing from other sources. Is it true that they were in their underwear when the police showed up? I don’t know. I’m certainly not gonna believe it just because it’s the narrative I want to be true.

I don’t expect to hear confirmation from the likes of CNN. They’re going with the right wing Trumper angle. I suspect that’s at least exaggerated.

And why just this source? It’s not. There’s Trunews. Newsmax. I mean, even Fox News has reported some whoppers. They all do it. I’ve never said I thought those left wing sources are any more reliable. Do you think GWP is immune to telling whoppers to push political narratives because they print stories that tickle your ears? I’m just trying to figure out what happened.

For example, I read one story from a right wing site that this guy was the same guy that was in the car with Paul Pelosi when he got arrested. Well. I don’t see any evidence that anyone was in the car. The police report didn’t mention anyone. Just Pelosi, and the driver of the other car that was involved. But it would be a great narrative if it were true. Very embarrassing for team D.

And there’s the broken window with the broken glass on the outside. Are we sure it’s not some other window? Why are you so sure the right doesn’t pull hoaxes either?

 

[jamil]

I agree GWP can be a little "out there" at times. But damn a lot of their wild stories have been proven true. I always take a wait and see attitude anymore .

A lot have been proven true. Some are complete ******** though. When are they telling the truth, and when are they full of ****? That’s what we have to figure out. I question whether this is the same guy who ran that blog, because there are odd circumstances. So GWP might be right about that. I have no idea if the underwear story is correct. I’m actually hoping it is because this story would turn hilarious instantly for many reasons. But I need a better reason to believe it other than because I want it to be true.

 

[jamil]

Well, you don't listen to Christians saying it, so I'm sure an atheist doesn't move the needle.

How did this even become a religious discussion? Obviously a rhetorical question.

 

[KG1]

I believe in calling out blatant hypocrisy, if it makes you feel better. What does your carpenter say about that?

I love you brother. No hypocrisy here. Even though you would continually mock someone of faith such as myself I will not hate you for it. I wish you peace.

 

[Ingomike]

Do I have to say it every time some news outlet makes up a story? I say it when it’s relevant.

This is what I find disingenuous, you do not say it like this or about any other news source, it only seems relevant for GWP to you. You have some need to say it specifically about GWP, do you feel betrayed by them because they got something wrong you believed and possibly felt embarrassed you believed it?

They all do it. I’ve never said I thought those left wing sources are any more reliable. Do you think GWP is immune to telling whoppers to push political narratives because they print stories that tickle your ears?

I don’t trust any source to be 100%, it was foolish that we lived through an era that folks actually believed that BS. I do like some of what I learn from GWP though you seem to want to paint them with the broad brush in a way you just do not other sources.

 

[BugI02]

But I’d like to see some better sources to confirm the underwear story.

 

[BugI02]

Well, you don't listen to Christians saying it, so I'm sure an atheist doesn't move the needle.

I don't listen to anybody who regularly shades the truth to push an agenda

Not everything is just about you

 

[ljk]

 

[foszoe]

In Paul's defense, being around Nasty may be what drove him to David....there's only so much a human can take

Are you saying Paul is a Nancy Boy?

 

[foszoe]

This is what I find disingenuous, you do not say it like this or about any other news source, it only seems relevant for GWP to you. You have some need to say it specifically about GWP, do you feel betrayed by them because they got something wrong you believed and possibly felt embarrassed you believed it?


I don’t trust any source to be 100%, it was foolish that we lived through an era that folks actually believed that BS. I do like some of what I learn from GWP though you seem to want to paint them with the broad brush in a way you just do not other sources.

the solution is simple. Don't post anything without 2-3 collaborating sources. Most of us don't trust the MSM. I don't see why any of us should trust one source on anything. The harder one works to find 2-3 other sources the more likely one should be to consider the single source suspect.

If a newsworthy story is published by one source, it should be published by another.

Do you trust single sourced stories? I don't.

 

[foszoe]

Not everything is just about you

Yeah! It's mostly about me and Bug!

 

[Ingomike]

the solution is simple. Don't post anything without 2-3 collaborating sources. Most of us don't trust the MSM. I don't see why any of us should trust one source on anything. The harder one works to find 2-3 other sources the more likely one should be to consider the single source suspect.

If a newsworthy story is published by one source, it should be published by another.

Do you trust single sourced stories? I don't.

This does not work either, if it did Trump would be in prison for Russian collusion because the entire MSM reported it, literally hundreds of sources all reported it. So all the BS is a fail…

 

[foszoe]

This does not work either, if it did Trump would be in prison for Russian collusion because the entire MSM reported it, literally hundreds of sources all reported it. So all the BS is a fail…

I did ask a question. Do you trust single sourced stories?

I did not say that because you found multiple sources for a story that the story was true. I did imply it is more likely to be true, however I did not say you had to believe it.

I only asked do you trust single sourced stories?

 

[jamil]

View attachment 233695

I mean. Photographic evidence would at least BE evidence, lol.