Mike the Gun Guy, from the Huffington Post

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Aug 23, 2009
    1,855
    113
    Brainardland
    I've noticed recently that his articles seem to be getting increasingly inarticulate and rambling. He doesn't seem to understand what point he's trying to make or how to convey it.

    One he did this past week was something about what the US would be like if there were no guns. It ran around in circles, ended up nowhere and made no point that I could discern.
     

    Bill of Rights

    Cogito, ergo porto.
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Apr 26, 2008
    18,096
    77
    Where's the bacon?
    . There's that phrase again...

    Which one, need?

    What's that shirt say? "No one needs an AR-15? Well no one needs a whiny little b****, either, yet here you are!"

    poundsand.png
     

    EvilElmo

    Expert
    Rating - 100%
    8   0   0
    Feb 11, 2009
    1,237
    48
    Dearborn Co.
    [noparse]http://cdn2.bigcommerce.com/server6100/a9579/products/3897/images/17080/Nobody_needs_an_AR15__99189__93815.1454604340.1280.1280.jpg?c=2[/noparse]
     
    Last edited by a moderator:

    DFu4ever

    Plinker
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 7, 2016
    10
    1
    Hobart
    ...we also have to make it easier to track and control the most lethal kinds of weapons, even when they are owned by law-abiding folks.

    But if they are law-abiding then there is no reason to "track and control" them. And if you ponder the idea of "most lethal" too much, it'll give you a headache.

    I've always found the level of intellectual dishonesty from writers like this to be annoying, especially when they propose ideas like "track and control". My question would be...define "control".
     

    actaeon277

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Nov 20, 2011
    95,242
    113
    Merrillville
    But if they are law-abiding then there is no reason to "track and control" them. And if you ponder the idea of "most lethal" too much, it'll give you a headache.

    I've always found the level of intellectual dishonesty from writers like this to be annoying, especially when they propose ideas like "track and control". My question would be...define "control".

    We refer to him as a Fudd. HIS guns are okay.
    But any other guns, he doesn't approve of and therefore they MUST be illegal.
     

    tacticalmaster45

    Marksman
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Jun 18, 2016
    162
    2
    Evansville
    I go to his website every so often to skim his articles and usually vomit a little each time. The guy is a joke - a so called firearm expert because he owned a gun shop. I just wish I could meet this blowhard and tell him how worthless he is.
     

    rhino

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    24   0   0
    Mar 18, 2008
    30,906
    113
    Indiana
    I go to his website every so often to skim his articles and usually vomit a little each time. The guy is a joke - a so called firearm expert because he owned a gun shop. I just wish I could meet this blowhard and tell him how worthless he is.


    Just like our ol' pal Don of Don's Guns.
     

    Site Supporter

    INGO Supporter

    Staff online

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    530,676
    Messages
    9,956,899
    Members
    54,909
    Latest member
    RedMurph
    Top Bottom