Mandated vaccines or weekly testing for employers of 100+ people.......

[Hatin Since 87]

Probably was a big spike around the time Sanja Gupta was on Joe Rogan’s podcast. They talked quite a bit about Myocarditis. That podcast got millions of views. All that tells us is that it’s being talked about. And people are searching for information about it.

Right. But myocarditis isn’t new. So why, in a graph covering 20 years, is it being discussed so heavily now?


What has happened recently to influence such a heavy surge of research on the disease?

 

[Hatin Since 87]

Also, not to add the obvious, but I know you’re saying the Joe rogan podcast is a possible reason for the spike in searches. But why was rogan discussing myocarditis NOW? Again, it isn’t new... so what happened recently that’s given myocarditis such attention? Surely that is somewhat telling in itself. They didn’t just pick a disease and begin discussing it all over the world this last year.

 

[Route 45]

Also, not to add the obvious, but I know you’re saying the Joe rogan podcast is a possible reason for the spike in searches. But why was rogan discussing myocarditis NOW? Again, it isn’t new... so what happened recently that’s given myocarditis such attention? Surely that is somewhat telling in itself. They didn’t just pick a disease and begin discussing it all over the world this last year.

I googled myocarditis when I saw the uproar on social media.

Do I have myocarditis now?

 

[Hatin Since 87]

I googled myocarditis when I saw the uproar on social media.

Do I have myocarditis now?

Yes. That’s what I said

 

[Hatin Since 87]

 

[Alpo]

Are YOU intentionally trying to fool people? I posted an article, from yahoo, certainly not a conservative “alt” media site. Anything showing statistics that are against your beliefs is misinformation, right?

82% of the people dying were vaccinated, 95% of the population were vaccinated... why’s that hard to understand?

Let’s see.

95/100 people are vaccinated. 50 people die. Of those 50, 46 were vaccinated. 4 weren’t. Meaning of those that died, 92% were vaxxed, leaving 8% not.

Math is hard.

Just read further. You guys don't seem to get past the first paragraph before quoting an article.

In the over 80s the death rate among double jabbed people was 53 per 100,000 people compared to 125 per 100,000 for the over 80s who have not had their vaccine.

In the 70-79 age group the death rate for the double jabbed was 14 per 100,000 compared to 47 per 100,000 for those who have not had their vaccine.

 

[Route 45]

Yes. That’s what I said

That's what you are implying. If it's not, then why are you all hot and bothered by your 5 second Google Trends search?

 

[Route 45]

Breaking news: People google stuff that they see on the "news" and in social media.

 

[JCSR]

Breaking news: People google stuff that they see on the "news" and in social media.

More breaking news: Google censors every search.

 

[buckwacker]

Old people are dying? You don't say?

So, 2985 dies in that period. 82% of them were vaccinated. That's lower than the article's own figure of 95% of that population being vaccinated!


Are you intentionally trying to fool people?

From the article:

Based on those numbers, the benefit of vaccination is only marginal.

 

[JCSR]

Based on those numbers, the benefit of vaccination is only marginal.

You still die but it would be much worse unvaccinated .

 

[buckwacker]

No ever said it was magic.



No, no, no - you can't be rallying behind the claim that COVID deaths are inflated, while simultaneously attributing these deaths to COIVD. These people died after testing positive. I've been told over and over and over, that it's irresponsible for officials to say, "they died from COVID" just because they tested positive. And here you are doing just that.

And I quote:

[emphasis added]


It's likely that some of these deaths were actually because of COVID, because no one (responsible) has made the claim that any vaccine is 100% effective at preventing death. Did they all die from COVID? You tell me.

When's the last time you heard of someone catching polio?

 

[Route 45]

More breaking news: Google censors every search.

You must be right, I couldn't find a thing on there.

 

[JCSR]

When's the last time you heard of someone catching polio?

That's not fair! You're comparing a vaccine that actually prevents polio to one that does not prevent covid. Do you see your error now?

 

[Hatin Since 87]

That's what you are implying. If it's not, then why are you all hot and bothered by your 5 second Google Trends search?

I’ll go slow.

Myocarditis has been around for 100 years.

Something happened recently to draw attention to myocarditis... thus provoking a trend in research 10x the amount of any prior point.


2000-2020: Barely searched.

2020-2021: Millions searching.


Why? What happened in the last year to provoke a spike in interest?


Do you think it’s just a coincidence?


Do you think someone chose a random disease and people started searching it?


What’s in the vaccine that makes people lose their common sense and ability to think logically about anything relating to the vaccine?

 

[BugI02]

You still die but it would be much worse unvaccinated .

Eat right, exercise, die anyway

 

[buckwacker]

Just read further. You guys don't seem to get past the first paragraph before quoting an article.

The numbers in different parts of the article don't even agree.

 

[JCSR]

You must be right, I couldn't find a thing on there.

View attachment 167094

FYI, I didn't Google this...

google censorship

• All
• Images
• Videos
• News
• Maps
• Shopping
• Meanings
• Settings

⇶
Privacy, simplified.



Share Feedback
All regions
Safe search: off
Any time

Censorship by Google - Wikipedia​

https://en.wikipedia.org › wiki › Censorship_by_Google
Google and its subsidiary companies, such as YouTube, have removed or omitted information from its services in order to comply with company policies, legal demands, and government censorship laws.. Numerous governments have asked Google to censor content. In 2012, Google ruled in favor of more than half the requests they received via court orders and phone calls.

Google Censorship - Stanford University Computer Science​

https://cs.stanford.edu › people › eroberts › cs201 › projects › 2010-11 › FreeExpressionVsSocialCohesion › google_policy.html
Google Censorship. When people think of Google censoring search results, China is the first nation that comes to mind, and not without reason. Until March 2010, Google had submitted to China's Internet censorship policies, blocking search results that discussed the Tiananmen Square massacre, the Taiwan independence movement, etc. ...

Learn All About the Google Censorship Debate - Censorship ...​

https://censorship.laws.com › google-censorship-debate
The Google Censorship debate addresses acts of censorship, which include altering, adjusting, banning, or editing the search results rendered by the Google Search Engine; many consider this act of Google Censorship to be a direct result of the content and subject matter latent within specific search results media perceived to be objectionable ...

Let's Smash Google Censorship - LewRockwell LewRockwell.com​

https://www.lewrockwell.com › 2021 › 10 › lew-rockwell › lets-smash-google-censorship-2
Let's Smash Google Censorship. By Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr. October 8, 2021. A few days ago, Google struck LRC with what they hope is a fatal blow. We get much of our income from advertising. Google sells websites like LRC the use of its advertising platform. This makes money for them: the number 1 libertarian site on the web, according to ...

Google Is the World's Biggest Censor and Its Power Must Be ...​

https://www.usnews.com › opinion › articles › 2016-06-22 › google-is-the-worlds-biggest-censor-and-its-power-must-be-regulated
The New Censorship. How did Google become the internet's censor and master manipulator, blocking access to millions of websites? By Robert Epstein Contributor June 22, 2016, at 9:00 a.m.

Google admits to censoring the World Socialist Web Site ...​

https://www.wsws.org › en › articles › 2020 › 11 › 04 › goog-n04.html
He was saying that Google does in fact take censorship action against left-wing and socialist publishers, and an example is the censorship of the World Socialist Web Site.

 

[jamil]

Right. But myocarditis isn’t new. So why, in a graph covering 20 years, is it being discussed so heavily now?


What has happened recently to influence such a heavy surge of research on the disease?

All it shows is that people are talking about it. It’s been reported as a result of COVID, and as a side effect of the vaccine. For the sake of argument, let’s say all that were ********. Fake news. I would still expect to see a spike in searches.

It doesn’t prove that people are getting myocarditis at higher rates, let alone implying a cause. The statistics on myocarditis cases would be the thing that does that.

 

[KLB]

What’s in the vaccine that makes people lose their common sense and ability to think logically about anything relating to the vaccine?

Nothing special. People like to argue their decisions like they are gospel truth. It happens in a lot of arguments. Both sides do it.