List Your Shooters, Part IV

[JettaKnight]

I got a PM from him where he offered some advice. Which I thought was odd since he isnt a site supporter.

So once the 50 trips it doesnt reset after deletion?

Only for gods.

 

[Bigtanker]

He tried to be helpful and gave me a source in regards to my WTB ad. It was an out of state person so totally not interested, but I'll give him an E for effort. In other circumstances it would have been a helpful message.

Another glitch in our old system. I've sent it up the chain.

 

[churchmouse]

Is this legal? Asking because I honestly don't know

https://www.indianagunowners.com/forums/parts-accessories/477414-poor-mans-binary-trigger.html

Not here. Anything along these lines is verboten legal or no.

 

[2A_Tom]

No IT"S shiny!
[video=youtube;8q_lsRLJhcA]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8q_lsRLJhcA[/video]

 

[jsharmon7]

He tried to be helpful and gave me a source in regards to my WTB ad. It was an out of state person so totally not interested, but I'll give him an E for effort. In other circumstances it would have been a helpful message.

I got a similar PM, which I took to be a scammer.

 

[Bigtanker]

I got a similar PM, which I took to be a scammer.

He's done for good.

 

[2A_Tom]

.

 

[Ruger_Ronin]

Only for gods.

 

[1775usmarine]

He's done for good.

Must of been Michael Bloomberg probing our lines.

 

[femurphy77]

The member won't bother anyone for a while.

I wondered.

I was voting for "Smote the Hell out of him".



(Great scene in the Movie "Michael" by the way!)

 

[Bigtanker]

I wondered.

I was voting for "Smote the Hell out of him".



(Great scene in the Movie "Michael" by the way!)

I originally gave the banned member a temp because the glitch in the system letting them PM when they had 0 posts. This kept them from doing so until the glitch was fixed. Once the glitch was fixed however, several of you had reported the PM's he had sent (yes, you can report PM's) and they were all for the same place. So the former member was spamming. They are now permanently banished.

 

[danmdevries]

He tried to be helpful and gave me a source in regards to my WTB ad. It was an out of state person so totally not interested, but I'll give him an E for effort. In other circumstances it would have been a helpful message.

Same, on my closed WTB ad he sent me the email of someone in Kansas City to contact for a current production Glock...

 

[Backpacker]

I googled his username earlier today and found he recently joined other firearms forums.

 

[ArcadiaGP]

For that thread.

 

[BiscuitsandGravy]

I googled his username earlier today and found he recently joined other firearms forums.

He does seem to have been propagating...

 

[2A_Tom]

For that thread.

 

[churchmouse]

Much I would like to say. None of which would make even a modicum of difference.

 

[Vigilant]

For that thread.

Which one?

 

[ArcadiaGP]

Which one?

Last time I made a thread on Limbaugh, completely innocuous news, it was locked. Reason really stems from the sorts that hop in and chum the waters with things like "I hate the guy, but..."

Then people take the bait, and it just goes into dumb back-and-forths unrelated to the main thread topic.

And the current Limbaugh thread is trending that same way, with similar participants.

 

[femurphy77]

Last time I made a thread on Limbaugh, completely innocuous news, it was locked. Reason really stems from the sorts that hop in and chum the waters with things like "I hate the guy, but..."

Then people take the bait, and it just goes into dumb back-and-forths unrelated to the main thread topic.

And the current Limbaugh thread is trending that same way, with similar participants.

I've been avoiding that one for that reason but now my curiousity is piqued! I wonder if the usual suspects are the usual suspects? We may get a shooter after all.