Get Government out of interpersonal contracts.
And so the interesting legal implications kaleidoscope begins to rotate anew. Imagine all the possible combinations available. Inheritance? Health insurance? Tax exemptions? Marriage between corporate officers or corporate boards? What have I missed?
Had to see it coming on the heels of M/M and F/F marriage.
My advise on this situation.
1. It's important to have a woman who helps at home,
cooks from time to time, cleans up, and has a job.
2. It's important to have a woman who can make you
laugh.
3.. It's important to have a woman whom you can trust,
and doesn't lie to you.
4.. It's important to have a woman who is good in bed,
and likes to be with you.
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
V
5.. It's very, VERY important that these four women
do not know each other.
I'm all for it.
"Marriage equality for all" .... do they mean it? Do they also support cousin, sibling, or parent/child marriages? I'm not condoning or condemning, just asking if "equality for all"really means for all.