Kavanaugh Confirmation Hearings

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • HoughMade

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Oct 24, 2012
    36,179
    149
    Valparaiso
    Democrats are pro-pedophiles now?

    I don't know about Tomb's position, but I would answer your question by stating that those who will champion the pedo cause from a civil rights perspective are on the left, but not everyone on the left, not even close, would do so. As it stands now, it is a tiny minority....but go back as few as 20 or 30 years and you will see some things that were supported by a tiny minority which have hit the mainstream.

    I have been talking about the lowering of consent ages and the related pedophile issue as a coming civil rights issue for years. How close it is to being a major issue? Don't know, but its out there....and one of the arguments will be the rights of minor to engage in their chosen behavior.

    Of course the first step is changing the language- when you see that start to be a more common talking point, you don't want to see what is just around the corner.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_pedophile_and_pederast_advocacy_organizations

    https://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/06/opinion/pedophilia-a-disorder-not-a-crime.html

    https://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=95942&page=1

    https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/tedx-pedophilia-sexual-orientation/

    https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4438&context=wlulr

    https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-26352378

    ....My internet search history is now bespoiled and thanks to the Patriot Act, you may not be hearing from me for a while.
     
    Last edited:

    Trigger Time

    Air guitar master
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 98.6%
    204   3   0
    Aug 26, 2011
    40,114
    113
    SOUTH of Zombie city
    Every body had a better dress code than today.

    86 World Series.
    1986-1027-Darryl-Strawberry-079114262.jpg

    1986 air travel.
    dc8-1980-onboard-500x600.jpg

    McDonald's 1986.
    LON93983.jpg
    People now dress like ****ing slobs. I cant stand it. No self respect. You dont have to be wealthy or even middle class to dress decent and not look like a trash or a thug.
    It's really one of my pet peeves.
    I don't fly much anymore but when I flew a lot for work I always wore pants and minimum a polo shirt.
    This sandals fad that has been happening is so stupid. Wear ****ing sandals in a public shower, to the pool, or the beach. Not out in public you jackwahgons. Also sweat pants. Dont even get me started
     

    Dead Duck

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    53   0   0
    Apr 1, 2011
    14,062
    113
    .
    I don't know about Tomb's position, but I would answer your question by stating that those who will champion the pedo cause from a civil rights perspective are on the left, but not everyone on the left, not even close, would do so. As it stands now, it is a tiny minority....but go back as few as 20 or 30 years and you will see some things that were supported by a tiny minority which have hit the mainstream.

    I have been talking about the lowering of consent ages and the related pedophile issue as a coming civil rights issue for years. How close it is to being a major issue? Don't know, but its out there....and one of the arguments will be the rights of minor to engage in their chosen behavior.

    Of course the first step is changing the language- when you see that start to be a more common talking point, you don't want to see what is just around the corner.

    Civil rights?
    It's so easy. Dangerous brain deformities should be at the least isolated, and eradicated if needed.
    Glad I could help.
     

    2A_Tom

    Crotchety old member!
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Sep 27, 2010
    26,340
    113
    NWI
    I googled those pictures and each said explicitly 1986 in the stories.

    The McDonald's was in another English speaking country.
     

    printcraft

    INGO Clown
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    16   0   0
    Feb 14, 2008
    39,734
    113
    Uranus
    It's a 1000 year reich...

    [video=youtube;ICNTmc7-B94]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ICNTmc7-B94[/video]

    You are ****ing lunatics.
     

    2A_Tom

    Crotchety old member!
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Sep 27, 2010
    26,340
    113
    NWI
    It's a 1000 year reich...

    [video=youtube;ICNTmc7-B94]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ICNTmc7-B94[/video]

    You are ****ing lunatics.

    The looks on the faces of a couple of those people when he said 1000 year reign was awesome.
     

    printcraft

    INGO Clown
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    16   0   0
    Feb 14, 2008
    39,734
    113
    Uranus
    "Doesn't matter if he is guilty or not, just that the question has been raised and he is angry we need to stop his nomination." - [STRIKE]Cory Booker[/STRIKE] Spartacus, democrat.

    [video=youtube;OGGUQjSi1TQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGGUQjSi1TQ[/video]
     

    Alamo

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Oct 4, 2010
    9,329
    113
    Texas
    I ran across this while chasing some Kavanaugh links elsewhere, and it will be the defining image in my mind, forever and ever, of the calm, measured, carefully articulated opposition to Kavanaugh's appointment.

    WARNING: Do NOT click the link without an emergency supply of Brain Bleach that you can get your hands on even if you're suddenly struck completely blind.

    In fact, you should probably just skip this and go on to the next post. Go on! Shoo!

    Ewww.
     

    KG1

    Forgotten Man
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    66   0   0
    Jan 20, 2009
    26,159
    149
    "Doesn't matter if he is guilty or not, just that the question has been raised and he is angry we need to stop his nomination." - [STRIKE]Cory Booker[/STRIKE] Spartacus, democrat.

    [video=youtube;OGGUQjSi1TQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGGUQjSi1TQ[/video]
    Shove it up your backside Spartacus. Sideways.
     

    jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    62,274
    113
    Gtown-ish
    No, I don't mean like that, and honestly, I'm missing the relevance to my original comment.
    I think the relevance is, though the conclusion may be true enough, the premise is baseless in both cases. Hands up don’t shoot didn’t happen. And any of the claims made against Kavenaugh by democrats have been unsubstantiated. An accusation alone isn’t evidence of wrongdoing.

    But, I do agree that both cases are indicative of a deep problem. People are willing to lie and ruin people’s lives to gain political power. Both of those examples are evidnce of that. The left was willing to ruin the life of that police officer in Missouri just so that they could forward a narrative of what they claim America is.

    The left is willing to ruin Kavenaugh just because they think he will rule against their bat **** crazy ideology. Both were horrible examples of immorality carried out by the left. And then I read an astonishing article today claiming that they took the high road. Simply astonishing how incapable of self reflection they are. They actually think that they’re fighting injustice when they’re actually causing it. What they tried to do to Kavenaugh is taking the moral high road! Unbelievable! WTF must the low road look like? Should we be glad they didn’t Clinton him?
     
    Top Bottom