Jackbooted Thugs!!

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • thompal

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Sep 27, 2008
    3,545
    113
    Beech Grove
    I am honesty not sure I work from as a programmer so I have no experience in this situation, my gut reaction is to let my insurance deal with it I don't think its valid reason to put myself in danger. if you disagree, please share why, I may learn from it.

    Umm, because it's infinitely more convenient to shout "HEY! GET AWAY FROM THERE!" than it is to deal with insurance claims, waiting for a settlement check, finding a new car, being without a car for some period of time, and having your insurance rates go up.
     

    AndersonIN

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    May 21, 2009
    1,627
    38
    Anderson, IN
    Umm, because it's infinitely more convenient to shout "HEY! GET AWAY FROM THERE!" than it is to deal with insurance claims, waiting for a settlement check, finding a new car, being without a car for some period of time, and having your insurance rates go up.

    Frank and Movealongmovealong won't go for that either!

    You didn't say "Hey! GET AWAY FROM THERE!" PLEASE!

    All YOU did was escalate the situation giving them a reason for breaking into your car in the first place! :n00b:
     

    88GT

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 29, 2010
    16,643
    83
    Familyfriendlyville
    I am honesty not sure I work from as a programmer so I have no experience in this situation, my gut reaction is to let my insurance deal with it I don't think its valid reason to put myself in danger. if you disagree, please share why, I may learn from it.

    What does working as a programmer have to do with it? I'm a SAH homeschooling mom of two kids and I know what I would do.

    I take it you've never had a vehicle stolen. Well, it's a horrible experience. Just plain horrible. And I will not stand by and watch while a bunch of selfish O2 wasters make off with my truck. I WILL confront them. Beyond that, VUPD blue has told me I can't comment. But they will not take my truck. Of that you can be sure.

    What they decide to do when I politely tell them to GTFO here is up to them. And that will determine the course of the my actions from that point.
     

    Captain Morgan

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Aug 18, 2012
    467
    18
    terrible haute
    Correct me if I am wrong.

    So you have an agressive young adult and his 2 friends come up on you and threaten you to leave "their" park. They even go so far as to sit down across a picnic table from you and take food off your plate to emphasize the point. And your response should be to pack up and leave hoping they do not become more violent and decide to take your stuff or just beat you to death for fun.

    Or I guess we are suppose to know that these particular D-Bags are harmless and we will be fine retreating. I am suprised that the OP let them that close after threatening them. Personally, I am not letting someone that close to me after they have just treatened me.

    Maybe he should have pulled out his cellphone and called the proper people to deal with them, and just wait for the cops to hurry up and get there. I am positive the police would have show up before the punks did anything bad.

    Personally, I think that they may have been testing the water so to speak. If they thought the prey was easy enough they might just have not let them leave as suggested by some. I don't think pulling a weapon in this case is out of the question either. The OP does not know their intent, and to say it is unjustified is speculation at best. If anything he may have underestimated their potential by letting them get that close.

    A threat is a threat and I treat all equally. I am glad the OP did not try to leave as we may have been reading about it on the news and not from his post.

    I inserted bold into the above quote, as I think it highlights a very important point. The OP may very well have not been in fear for his life when the punks first approached, or even when they sat across from him, but things very well could have escalated if these guys were just "testing the waters."

    I found this on AR15.com and think it's a great read. Thought I'd link it, as well as cut/paste here:

    Street robberies and you - The Basics - AR15.COM
    Lately in general discussion we have had two different board members find themselves looking down the barrel of a gun along with the GF of another ARFCOMMER in street robberies. Also Blitz308 got shot all to pieces last year.

    While many say it is better to be lucky than good, no one is lucky every time. In this post I am going to attempt to provide some insight into street encounters. Other may have different viewpoints. I am not here to argue. I will say some of the comments I have seen posted in the threads about this sort of matter make me realize that while some ARFCOMMERS are clearly street veterans others are not. This is really for those who are not.

    Background

    First, my info. I worked in the street of one of America's most violent, dangerous cities for 15 years. I usually worked in the worst part of that city. I spent 15 years in patrol. I liked patrol. It was wild. Most of the time I worked in areas covered in ghetto. By that I mean large housing projects combined with run down slum housing. I have worked all shifts. Later I became an investigator including a robbery investigator. I have spent countless hours in interrogation rooms talking to hold up men. I know them. I am still an investigator but have quit playing the Robbery game because my family was starting to forget what I looked like.

    The Enemy

    Some may object to me calling hold up men "the enemy". You can call them whatever you like. I can assure you however they are as deadly an enemy as you will find anywhere but the battlefield. Even many soldiers probably lack the viciousness and utter disregard for life most hold up men possess.

    No one wakes up in the morning one day and decides to become an armed robber. It is a gradual process that requires some experience and desensitizing. Before a man will pick up a gun and threaten to kill people who have done him no harm in order to get their usually meager possessions he has to get comfortable with some things.

    He has to get used to seeing others as objects for him to exploit. He has to accept he may be killed while robbing. He has to accept the felony conviction for Robbery will haunt him all his life. He has to accept he may need to kill a completely innocent person to get away with his crime.

    This is a process that starts with stealing candy at the corner store as a child. It progresses through bigger property crimes that may also involve violence. But one day G gets tired of selling his stolen property for nothing and decides it would be better to steal cash. Cut out all that tiresome sales stuff.


    Keep in mind many petty thieves, auto burglars, residential and commercial burglars, paper thieves, and hustlers will get to that point and decide not to become armed robbers. Most will. It is a special group of outliers who decide threatening to kill people for a few dollars is the way to go.

    Once a man starts armed robbing he has crossed a line most won't. Don't forget that when you are looking these bastards in the eye. Their decision to kill you is already made. Your life means nothing to him. Only his does. His sole motivation for not killing you is he doesn't want a murder case. He has already accepted he may pick one up though.

    We hunt hold up men around the clock once they are identified. We send teams of fire breathing fence jumper/door kickers to find them. We will bring their mother to the office and convince her she is going to jail if we don't have Junior in our office in an hour. We have her call her son crying hysterically for him to turn himself in before she is arrested and held without bond as a material witness and her home seized for harboring him. Most of the time they won't.
    censored.gif
    their own momma.

    We will hit all Juniors friends and family's houses. We make it so no one will harbor him. He is so hot no one will let him in their house or even talk on the phone with him. We put money on him so he knows he is right to be betrayed and set up. We do this because of one thing.

    That thing is they WILL kill someone if they keep robbing. That is why the city is willing to pay all the overtime. They don't want the murders. Think about that when you see Junior coming. The more robberies he does the closer he is to killing someone. Maybe you.

    The guys who hit you on the street are gang members. They are Gangster Disciples, Vice Lords, Crips, Sureonos, many others. They do not see themselves as part of society. The street is all they know. They don't expect to live long or stay out of prison. They take a delight in your fear and suffering. They are warped individuals for the most part. They can be extremely dangerous.

    One time we were locking up a hold up man and having a conversation about how they target their victims. I was saying they pick easy ones, another guy was saying they preferred easy ones but would take anybody.

    I pointed out a uniform Officer there was an NFL size guy to that hold up man. Frankly the dude was a monster. I asked hold up man if he would rob him. He said "If I needed the money".





    You

    Chances are good you are a law abiding person except for maybe a little light weed smoking and maybe driving a little drunk every once in a while. Most of your life you have been taught to be nice and don't point guns at people. You are the exact opposite of your enemy who was taught just the opposite. Remember a lot of street life is like prison life. Who's the man is everything. Violence is the currency of the street.

    You do not possess total disregard for the lives of others and do not want to kill anyone. You are concerned about the ramifications of shooting someone. Your family, your possessions and finances on the line. Your enemy has none of these concerns.

    The laws that keep you from carrying your gun in bars or where ever mean nothing to your enemy. Your reluctance to shoot someone works to is advantage. His greater experience in street violence and the element of surprise is on his side.

    Everyone should call their local FBI office and get a copy of Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted. When it first came out it was ground breaking because it demonstrated to academics and other elites what street police knew all along. What did it show in interviews with cop killers? Nice guys finish dead. That's right. Most of those offenders commented that the Officer they killed set himself up to be killed because of reluctance to use force early in the encounter.

    You can probably find it on line now. A lot of the victim Officers were a lot like a lot of other people, normal people. They were the opposite of their enemy.

    Am I advocating becoming the enemy? No. I am saying the person who is robbing you has certain traits, attitudes, and background. That is all.

    Dynamics of Encounters

    Hold up men target victims on the street in an impulsive, opportunistic manner. They see someone and make a quick judgment call on whether to rob them. The time between when you are targeted and they are on you isn't long. Therefore, situational awareness is everything.

    If you see G coming you are in good shape. If you don't you will be the victim who says "He came out of nowhere". No he didn't. There are many tricks to watching out but simply watching your back is the main thing. Watch your back. If you do it enough it becomes second nature and you won't even realize you are doing it.

    Watching out is great but unfortunately many self defense courses stop there. You have parked you car in a well lit area, are aware of your surroundings, and looky here, here comes three guys across the parking lot and they start to kind of fan out.

    When you lock eyes with G the very first thing you need to do it indicate you have a weapon. It doesn't matter if you do or not. If you are a woman put your gun hand in your purse and keep it there. If you are a man fan your shirt or coat tail with your gun hand. Make it clear to dude you are mentally prepared to draw and making sure your gun is clear. This will many times result in an about face by dude. It is the single best robbery avoidance tactic IMHO.

    Not long ago I was walking down the sidewalk in my town to go get my car. I was holding a folding chair in my gun hand. A car slow rolled past me with 4 heads in it. The guys in the back seat turned around as they went by looking at me. They went a little farther and U turned in the street.

    Here they come back. As they started to slow down I looked at them with as contemptuous a look as I could muster and switched the chair to my left hand and flicked my shirt tail with my right hand. They just drove on mad dogging me.

    In another case I was at a Christmas party and walked a girl to her car about 3 am. As we said our good-byes two guys were walking across the parking lot. One went behind a dumpster. I though he was peeing. He came out from behind the dumpster with a bottle.

    As they got closer I stepped clear of that girl and unzipped my jacket at those two guys. When I did the guy threw down the bottle and they walked by cussing at me. If someone challenges you after you indicate you are armed say "I don't have a gun". Then they will know you do.

    Here is an opposite story. A girl my brother knows was walking her dog when a guy approached her. She was polite. Mistake. He talked to her about the dog and said she had pretty hair and reached out and touched her hair. She did not slap his hand down or aggressively object. Mistake. He asked her if her dog bit and she said "No". At that time he slapped the
    poop.gif
    out of her, drug her into a wooded area, and raped her.

    The answer in the street is always "No". Can I ask you something? No. Do you have a cigarette? No. Can you tell me what time it is? No. The answer is always "No". Don't be nice. Stop the encounter as soon as it starts.

    When to draw

    Despite warnings I often see on the Net I have yet to encounter an instance in which a hold up man called the police to report his intended victim threatened to shoot him. Thugs do not want to come into contact with the police. They may already be wanted or realize chances are good they have been identified in a recent robbery. Or what ever. They are not going to call the police if you draw on them.



    Supposed two guys are approaching you in a parking lot and do the classic fan out maneuver. You indicate you have a weapon by clearing your gun hand and fanning your jacket at them. They are not discouraged. DRAW!

    I am not saying you should pull your gun out, assume a Weaver stance, and scream "That's close enough mother
    censored.gif
    ers!" What I am saying is draw your gun and hold it beside your leg as you start to move to cover. I am very fond of telephone poles. Anything will do though. They will see this. They will remember they have to be somewhere else. They will not call the police.

    Then you can just put your gun back in the holster and go back to whatever you were doing like nothing happened. Why? Because nothing did happen. A happening is when shots are fired.

    Do not hesitate to draw. If you are somewhere you are supposed to be and someone appears who is not supposed to be there like a closed business show him the end of your gun. Could it be Mother Teresa looking for her lost cat behind your closed business? No it is some mother
    censored.gif
    er up to no good. He won't call the police to report he was prowling a location when a guy ran him off.

    When to shoot

    The time to shoot is immediately upon seeing his weapon. You are not a police man who has to try to arrest the guy. No need to scream at him. No exposure while you yell for him to drop the gun.

    In deer hunting the experienced hunter takes the first good shot. May not be the perfect shot but it never is. Novices pass up a doable shot waiting for a better shot and then the deer is gone. Take the first good shot you are offered. Hopefully your alertness and hostile cues will prevent you ever having to fire. But once you see his weapon, shoot.

    If a guy is coming at you with a gun in his hand shoot him. Shoot him right then. If you don't shoot first you may not shoot at all. I have known more than one person who was shot and received life changing injuries and also shot their attacker. Their only regret was not shooting sooner. Like Bill Jordan said "Nothing disturbs your enemy's aim like a slug delivered to the belt buckle area".

    Guns and weapons

    The handgun is the best weapon you can carry easily. I understand it is not always possible to have one due to laws, restrictions, whatever. I am not telling anyone to disregard laws about carrying weapons. Each person has to decide for themselves what they are comfortable with. I will say there is no substitute for a pistol when you need one.


    Also if you can not be trusted with a pistol after a few drinks you can't be trusted with a pistol period. Booze is liquid bad judgment no doubt but it shouldn't make you into a damn moron. If you are a moron sober I don't know what to tell you.

    Types of guns and ammo are always debated and probably always will be. I have seen people shot with all common calibers. My conclusion is if you hit someone between the collar bone and the tip of their ribs three times with anything, they are handled. Bigger is better but something is better than nothing. Get your front sight on his shirt and stay on him as long as he is standing with whatever gun you have.

    Just have a gun with sure fire ammo. Draw early and fire immediately upon seeing his weapon. That course of action is about all you can do to up your odds of ending things favorably. Guns like the Ruger LC9, SIG 239, Glock 26/27 are examples of guns small enough to carry but with enough power and capacity to be useful. Do not be afraid to use a French Lebelle if that is the only gun you have. A gun is a gun. I like a Glock 19.

    Training

    We all want the best training. It can be expensive if you are having to pay for it and it can be hard to find the time to do it. There is a whole lot of BS out there. What can you do? First, pistol handling is not rocket surgery. If you will learn the basics and practice on your own you can be fine. Smooth draw, quick pairs, reload. If you know those things well you can be OK.

    I know a young man who shot down two hold up men in 2010 at very close range while he and his GF were walking home from the store. He in Wyatt Earp like fashion ignored the fire coming from the gunman and killed him and wounded his accomplice. He nor his GF were injured. He like many was willing to give them the money until he picked up on nonverbal cues that because of his GF they were not quite satisfied with the money. He had a Glock 27.

    He had only the most basic of training in gun handling but did do some draws and some dry fire a couple times a week and live fired maybe once a month. That basic skill combined with knowing what to do was enough. He shot at the first possible moment despite having let the guys get the drop on them. When the gunman turned his head because a car drove by that was the opening. A split second is a long time sometimes.

    Work on some one hand shooting at close range. That is a skill not as popular as it once was and you want to use two hands when you can. Often you can find yourself doing something with your off hand though so be able to shoot with one hand out to 5 yards or so.




    After

    If it comes to pass you are forced to shoot someone do not feel bad. When the police come just tell them a guy threatened you with deadly force and you were forced to fire. I know there are bad police out there in some parts of the country who don't support self defense. I can't help you with that.

    Do not talk to them until you have your attorney present. Now most young guys don't have an attorney on retainer and you may have no idea who to call. That is OK. You will figure it out but in the mean time don't talk about what happened other than to say you were forced to fire. You don't have to be an ******* just remember wait for your attorney.

    Hopefully you will not give a statement for a couple days. Remember if you are put in jail that doesn't mean you are charged. Most places can hold you 48 or 72 hours on a felony before charging you or letting you go. Breath deep and get an attorney.

    Expect to never get your gun back. You may get it back one day but maybe not. Do not buy expensive guns for the street. Buy yourself a nice sporting gun if you want a nice gun. Keep your street guns basic. The factory Model 10 Smith and the GI 45 have done a lot of work over the years and aren't fancy.

    Worlds

    We all live in different worlds. My world is filled with felons and gang members. Violence is common place. No one would be surprised if one of their friends called and said they shot a hold up man at a place of business or parking lot. In the past when I made calls the fact that the guy who is beating his GF is also on parole for 2nd degree murder flavored my world.

    You may live in a smaller, less violent place where shootings seldom occur and it would be a rare to shoot a hold up man. I envy you and will be moving to a place like your town as soon as I can.

    But be advised no matter where you are a hold man is going to be about the same. Whether he is a home boy or a guy who just exited the interstate into your town and needs some quick money. He is going to have a vicious streak and no regard for your life. Treat him like he treats you.

    Giving them the money, doing what they say, all that may work but there is no guarantee. If you have never read Jeff Cooper's book The Principles of Personal Defense I suggest you order a copy immediately. It is a short book but summarizes a lot of important things.

    Last year we had a trial here regarding an armed robbery that occurred. Three or four guys took a young couple from a parking garage near a college out by some railroad tracks where they raped, shot, and beat them. Their lives will never be the same.

    The lesser thugs all turned on the trigger man at trial. The trigger man's statement in the paper was after all that had happened he felt like he was a victim. Think about that. That is the mindset you are up against.
     

    Fixer

    Expert
    Rating - 96.4%
    26   1   1
    Nov 22, 2009
    1,157
    63
    Fort Wayne Area
    ^^^My point exactly.

    Not sure I would confront the BG stealing my car. I am not that fond of it!:D

    If someone is threatening me I will be taking the appropriate steps to keep them at a distance I feel comfortable with.

    I am not saying letting his dogs loose was a good idea, he even admitted it wasn't. I think he was lucky it worked out ok. It could have gone a lot worse. I hope in the future that he heads them off before they get a chance to get into striking distance. At that point is is to late to be able to effectively defend yourself.
     

    Burnsy

    Expert
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Apr 6, 2012
    784
    18
    NW Indiana
    What does working as a programmer have to do with it? I'm a SAH homeschooling mom of two kids and I know what I would do.

    I take it you've never had a vehicle stolen. Well, it's a horrible experience. Just plain horrible. And I will not stand by and watch while a bunch of selfish O2 wasters make off with my truck. I WILL confront them. Beyond that, VUPD blue has told me I can't comment. But they will not take my truck. Of that you can be sure.

    What they decide to do when I politely tell them to GTFO here is up to them. And that will determine the course of the my actions from that point.

    I included it to give context that I don't get out much or use or look at my car for that matter often, no I have never had a car no anything of mine stolen so perhaps I am naive about the insurance process.
     

    88GT

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 29, 2010
    16,643
    83
    Familyfriendlyville
    I included it to give context that I don't get out much or use or look at my car for that matter often,
    And you think a SAH mom gets out a whole lot? You'll need to come up with a better excuse for introducing irrelevant information and attempting to pawn it off as something pertinent than that. You could leave your house but once a year. It wouldn't matter.

    no I have never had a car no anything of mine stolen so perhaps I am naive about the insurance process.

    I'm trying to be civil but you are either incredibly dense, purposefully obtuse, or just trolling the heck out of this thread.

    It's not just the insurance process. But I think you know that.

    Since you refuse to engage in meaningful conversation in this thread, I will cease my attempts to have a logical one with you. G'day.
     

    Burnsy

    Expert
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Apr 6, 2012
    784
    18
    NW Indiana
    And you think a SAH mom gets out a whole lot? You'll need to come up with a better excuse for introducing irrelevant information and attempting to pawn it off as something pertinent than that. You could leave your house but once a year. It wouldn't matter.



    I'm trying to be civil but you are either incredibly dense, purposefully obtuse, or just trolling the heck out of this thread.

    It's not just the insurance process. But I think you know that.

    Since you refuse to engage in meaningful conversation in this thread, I will cease my attempts to have a logical one with you. G'day.

    The information was not irrelevant in my option, it's purpose was to convey that my truck is garage kept and not used often. Therefore it is at a less than normal exposure and opportunity to be stolen when compared to someone who users their vehicle on a daily basis to commute to work and must leave it in a public and possibly unsecure parking lot. Doesn't mean my truck could not be stolen simply because it lives most of it's life in a closed garage but its likely to have less of a chance due to less public exposure. As a result, I have not given the situation much thought, hence the most recent conversation in this thread.

    I am aware that there are additional aspects to having ones car stolen that exclude dealing with insurance. Such as not having a car until a replacement is obtained. I am still unsure if confronting a known criminal who is possibly armed is worth that confrontation and possible bodily harm to me instead of staying in a safe location and contacting the police and dealing with insurance, not having a car for a while etc. The actions that you say that you would choose could be the correct ones (the obviously are for you), I am simply undecided on what I would do.

    I was not aware that one is required to agree with you in order to not be dense, obtuse or a troll but I am going to have to be one in your opinion because I also disagree with that requirement.
     
    Last edited:

    Fixer

    Expert
    Rating - 96.4%
    26   1   1
    Nov 22, 2009
    1,157
    63
    Fort Wayne Area
    I do agree that they were in the wrong. I do agree that the OP should not have just left the park at their request. I do feel though that the OP was safe in the situation and he said so himself. Additionally he clearly had two dogs with him and said he was CCing. I don't think the actions by the idiot kids denoted the dogs. Instead I think it would have been better to move away, call the police and wait.

    If idiot kids decided to actually do something to put the OP in harms way while waiting instead of throwing food around and acting like said idiots he certainly had the means to defend himself with deadly force and would have created valuable distance in the process to do so if needed AND warranted.

    Dogs are unpredictable, he said his dogs are well trained and know when his family are in danger, yet one decided that the chicken was more important. If he really did feel his life was in danger a better course of action would have been to drop the dog leash, if they help great, if they don't as one did not, fine but the primary purpose of doing so would be to free his hands to draw and use his gun.

    I understand this is just my opinion and that it differs from most of the people who have posted theirs.
    Which is it go or stay.

    Instead of just pointing out what he did wrong, make a suggestion of what you might do. OP already stated he didn't think it was the best idea, so lets agree and stop dwelling on that point.

    I don't think leaving is an option. it will only embolden them to do more or become more violent. Maybe next time they decide to rob someone. And packing up your picnic while 3 thugs stand in your face running you off is worse than ill advised!
     

    AndersonIN

    Master
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    May 21, 2009
    1,627
    38
    Anderson, IN
    The information was not irrelevant in my option, it's purpose was to convey that my truck is garage kept and not used often. Therefore it is at a less than normal exposure and opportunity to be stolen when compared to someone who users their vehicle on a daily basis to commute to work and must leave it in a public and possibly unsecure parking lot. Doesn't mean my truck could not be stolen simply because it lives most of it's life in a closed garage but its likely to have less of a chance due to less public exposure. As a result, I have not given the situation much thought, hence the most recent conversation in this thread.

    I am aware that there are additional aspects to having ones car stolen that exclude dealing with insurance. Such as not having a car until a replacement is obtained. I am still unsure if confronting a known criminal who is possibly armed is worth that confrontation and possible bodily harm to me instead of staying in a safe location and contacting the police and dealing with insurance, not having a car for a while etc. The actions that you say that you would choose could be the correct ones (the obviously are for you), I am simply undecided on what I would do.

    I was not aware that one is required to agree with you in order to not be dense, obtuse or a troll but I am going to have to be one in your opinion because I also disagree with that requirement.

    Once again someone that wants to post on here but hasn't read the FAQ section!!!

    Question Must I always agree with GT88?

    Answer: Paragraph 17, subsection A, Group W and I quote "All posters MUST agree with 88GT or accept being referred to as 'dense, obtuse or a troll! in all future posts" :laugh:
     
    Last edited:

    2A_Tom

    Crotchety old member!
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Sep 27, 2010
    26,340
    113
    NWI
    Hey ferret face,

    No one in this thread has said that it is OK to use deadly force to defend property.

    The regular members of INGO are mostly well read on IC.

    We understand castle, we understand deadly force, and we don't take members guns away.

    You have been trying for days to impune the judgement of our bud, Ralphie.

    You have correctly cited segments of IC-35-47 which deals with firearms, WMD's, tasers, oc pepper sprays, body armor, and etc.

    Nowhere in IC 35-47 does it mention dogs as a form of deadly force. May be you should start lobying senator Tomes to add dogs next legislative session.
     

    2A_Tom

    Crotchety old member!
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Sep 27, 2010
    26,340
    113
    NWI
    Found it for you.

    *IC 15-20-1-3*
    *Dog bite liability
    ******Sec. 3. (a) If a dog, without provocation, bites a person:
    ********(1) who is acting peaceably; and
    ********(2) who is in a location where the person may be required to be in order to discharge a duty imposed upon the person by:
    ************(A) the laws of Indiana;
    ************(B) the laws of the United States; or
    ************(C) the postal regulations of the United States;
    the owner of the dog is liable for all damages suffered by the person bitten.
    ****(b) The owner of a dog described in subsection (a) is liable for damages even if:
    ********(1) the dog has not previously behaved in a vicious manner; or
    ********(2) the owner has no knowledge of prior vicious behavior by the dog.
    "As added by P.L.2-2008, SEC.11."

    However, I still contend that the op was actually defusing the situation and protecting his family. The point is no one was hurt.
     

    IndyDave1776

    Grandmaster
    Emeritus
    Rating - 100%
    12   0   0
    Jan 12, 2012
    27,286
    113
    Found it for you.

    *IC 15-20-1-3*
    *Dog bite liability
    ******Sec. 3. (a) If a dog, without provocation, bites a person:
    ********(1) who is acting peaceably; and
    ********(2) who is in a location where the person may be required to be in order to discharge a duty imposed upon the person by:
    ************(A) the laws of Indiana;
    ************(B) the laws of the United States; or
    ************(C) the postal regulations of the United States;
    the owner of the dog is liable for all damages suffered by the person bitten.
    ****(b) The owner of a dog described in subsection (a) is liable for damages even if:
    ********(1) the dog has not previously behaved in a vicious manner; or
    ********(2) the owner has no knowledge of prior vicious behavior by the dog.
    "As added by P.L.2-2008, SEC.11."

    However, I still contend that the op was actually defusing the situation and protecting his family. The point is no one was hurt.

    It would seem that the hoodlums flunked the test for liability.
     

    2A_Tom

    Crotchety old member!
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Sep 27, 2010
    26,340
    113
    NWI
    True. I did overlook that. Good catch.

    But Frank will probably say that flicking a piece of chicken on the floor still doesn't justify setting the hounds on them
     

    Captain Morgan

    Sharpshooter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Aug 18, 2012
    467
    18
    terrible haute
    Found it for you.

    *IC 15-20-1-3*
    *Dog bite liability
    ******Sec. 3. (a) If a dog, without provocation, bites a person:
    ********(1) who is acting peaceably; and
    ********(2) who is in a location where the person may be required to be in order to discharge a duty imposed upon the person by:
    ************(A) the laws of Indiana;
    ************(B) the laws of the United States; or
    ************(C) the postal regulations of the United States;
    the owner of the dog is liable for all damages suffered by the person bitten.
    ****(b) The owner of a dog described in subsection (a) is liable for damages even if:
    ********(1) the dog has not previously behaved in a vicious manner; or
    ********(2) the owner has no knowledge of prior vicious behavior by the dog.
    "As added by P.L.2-2008, SEC.11."

    However, I still contend that the op was actually defusing the situation and protecting his family. The point is no one was hurt.

    Bolded the important part. Pretty sure the punks weren't acting peaceably.
     

    upalot

    Marksman
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Sep 12, 2012
    242
    16
    PAWNEE
    Dang, reading this thred caused me to miss Law and Order. Jack boots, purple hair chicken on the floor, mad dogs, gotta go write a book.
     

    2A_Tom

    Crotchety old member!
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Sep 27, 2010
    26,340
    113
    NWI
    I finaly figured it out.

    The kid with the purple rooster comb thought that the OP was dining on his mother!
     

    Burnsy

    Expert
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Apr 6, 2012
    784
    18
    NW Indiana
    Hey ferret face,

    No one in this thread has said that it is OK to use deadly force to defend property.

    The regular members of INGO are mostly well read on IC.

    We understand castle, we understand deadly force, and we don't take members guns away.

    Since you don't feel like reading the last few pages of the thread, I don't feel like taking to time to summerize it for you. If you want to contibute in a way that makes sense, please click on the thread that I linked at the top of this page where you will find quite a few who feel using deadly force to defend property is the correct action some how do not and many have posted in both this and that thread as well as a news article about someone who did.
     
    Last edited:

    upalot

    Marksman
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Sep 12, 2012
    242
    16
    PAWNEE
    I do believe "You'll Soot Your Eye Out" did the best thing he could do in this situation. Had it been me in his place, not having dogs I would have drawn my side arm and left it up to the punk to decide if he would join the chicken on the floor.
     
    Top Bottom