It's official, Trump has been Acquitted

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • nonobaddog

    Grandmaster
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 10, 2015
    12,216
    113
    Tropical Minnesota
    The reason I stipulated that the simple majority in the house should include 1/3 of the president’s party, is that a partisan supermajority could still provide purely partisan articles of impeachment. This happened to Johnson. The house overwhelmingly voted in favor of the articles 147-46.

    Only 4 Representatives from Johnson’s own party voted in favor. It was about as partisan as it could be. The Senate also had a supermajority and could have voted to convict, but the constitutional arguments made against impeachment by the defense, which was essentially Dershowitz’s argument, convinced enough Republicans that the rule of law were more important to the Republic than their partisan whims were to them. I’m saying the requirement would be put in place so that impeaching the president does not even make it to the senate unless it has bipartisan support (at least 2/3 of the president’s own party) even if the overall vote is a simple majority.

    About the standard of actual damage to the Republic, I’m not sure there’s an objective way to define that. Every side is gonna rationalize it into favoring them. But I don’t really have a problem making that the standard and then watching the parties break limbs while contorting the logic to fit their partisan needs. Doesn’t matter a lot if they still have to get support from the other party.

    This would never happen with the dumocraps of today. Their whims are much more important to them than the rule of law.
     

    jamil

    code ho
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jul 17, 2011
    62,417
    113
    Gtown-ish
    This would never happen with the dumocraps of today. Their whims are much more important to them than the rule of law.
    That generally happens with more extreme partisans regardless of party. We’ve had some arguments right here on INGO where some posters were just fine with ignoring rule of law because the liked the outcome of ignoring it.
     

    Doug

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    69   0   0
    Sep 5, 2008
    6,632
    149
    Indianapolis
    That generally happens with more extreme partisans regardless of party. We’ve had some arguments right here on INGO where some posters were just fine with ignoring rule of law because the liked the outcome of ignoring it.

    Like Joe Biden's quid pro quo declared perfectly fine.
     

    ArcadiaGP

    Wanderer
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Jun 15, 2009
    31,729
    113
    Indianapolis
    Iowa Senator Joni Ernst warned Sunday that Republicans would immediately push to impeach Joe Biden over his work in Ukraine as vice president if he win the White House.

    source.gif
     

    Vigilant

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    21   0   0
    Jul 12, 2008
    11,659
    83
    Plainfield
    Impeach the MOTHER****ER! Whomever it may be, THAT is the result of the 2016 election. Nobody cares the economy is booming, unemployment for EVERYONE is at historical lows, in general the country is doing GREAT. Orangeman Bad must Impeach is the ONLY thing the Democratic Party cares about, its more important to remove Trump NOW, than try and beat him in November.
     

    Hatin Since 87

    Bacon Hater
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Mar 31, 2018
    11,914
    77
    Mooresville
    Impeach the MOTHER****ER! Whomever it may be, THAT is the result of the 2016 election. Nobody cares the economy is booming, unemployment for EVERYONE is at historical lows, in general the country is doing GREAT. Orangeman Bad must Impeach is the ONLY thing the Democratic Party cares about, its more important to remove Trump NOW, than try and beat him in November.

    All that may be true, but he says mean things, which is far more important than the economy and country as a whole.
     

    Kutnupe14

    Troll Emeritus
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jan 13, 2011
    40,294
    149
    Impeach the MOTHER****ER! Whomever it may be, THAT is the result of the 2016 election. Nobody cares the economy is booming, unemployment for EVERYONE is at historical lows, in general the country is doing GREAT. Orangeman Bad must Impeach is the ONLY thing the Democratic Party cares about, its more important to remove Trump NOW, than try and beat him in November.

    “Great” is subjective. The way one attains positive results is just as important as the results themselves. There are plenty of people that can say that the results are good, but dislike how they were gotten.
     

    2A_Tom

    Crotchety old member!
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Sep 27, 2010
    26,359
    113
    NWI
    “Great” is subjective. The way one attains positive results is just as important as the results themselves. There are plenty of people that can say that the results are good, but dislike how they were gotten.

    Example?
     

    IndyBeerman

    Was a real life Beerman.....
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Jun 2, 2008
    7,700
    113
    Plainfield
    Yes. I do now. The standard needs to be objective and far above Orange man bad, or, “he’s undoing our bureaucracy!” :runaway:

    And the actual law broken should be on the same level as treason, bribery, real ass Nixonian obstruction of justice. Impeachment was not intended to be the equivalent of a recall. A political party should not be able to arbitrarily impeach a president like the House Democrats did.

    Earlier you asked if we thought the Republicans would have tried to impeach Obama if he had done the same thing. I said, no they wouldn’t, because Obama had way more political capital than the Republicans. Even the premise of the question implies that it is political. I think if Republicans had enough political capital, the media behind them, partisan opposition deep in the government, and a rabidly partisan Speaker like Pelosi, they would have tried to concoct something to impeach Obama.

    Many Republicans had similar reactions to Obama as Democrats to Trump. There was talk of impeaching Obama from the start of his administration too. But no one took it seriously because it was primarily the bat-**** crazy wing of the Republican party, and they didn’t have much power, not even after the TEA Party invasion.

    I’m saying for the good of the country, presidents should be chosen by elections, and impeached only under extraordinary circumstances. If we’re going to accept the standards under which the Democrats tried to remove Trump, then we should have an impeachment trial for every president, and Obama most certainly should have been impeached.

    :yesway:
    You must spread some Reputation around before giving it to jamil again.
     

    Doug

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    69   0   0
    Sep 5, 2008
    6,632
    149
    Indianapolis
    Good economy.
    Low unemployment rates.
    Lower taxes.
    Most people are happy and successful.
    Fewer people are dependent on the Government for their existence.

    No wonder Trump is hated and was impeached.
     

    IndyBeerman

    Was a real life Beerman.....
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Jun 2, 2008
    7,700
    113
    Plainfield
    Good economy.
    Low unemployment rates.
    Lower taxes.
    Most people are happy and successful.
    Fewer people are dependent on the Government for their existence.

    No wonder Trump is hated and was impeached.

    Not if you're listening to CNN, MSNBC, and all liberal MSM who have spewed nothing but hate towards Trump, along with the Democraps running for President.

    They all employ the "no matter how good it is" philosophy. if you lie about it enough and loud enough, they will believe in your statement on how bad it is.
    Geez, after all, they thought it was good enough for Schiff to keep telling lies and not call him out on it, It has been their standard operating procedure since January 20th, 2017.


    Orange man bad, all he touches is bad, undermine and resist all that Orange man tries to accomplish. Imagine what COULD have been accomplished if there was a partisan congress.
     
    Top Bottom