Hamas Launches Infiltration, Rocket Attack on Israel

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • KLB

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Sep 12, 2011
    23,958
    77
    Porter County
    How many times has that been asked the last 10 years?
    Started Feb 2014. Almost 10 years old. :):
     

    printcraft

    INGO Clown
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    16   0   0
    Feb 14, 2008
    39,734
    113
    Uranus
    Whatever, dude.
    And I'm waiting for the attacks on foreign soil to begin. Most likely starting in Britain, France, and possibly here.
    I pray it doesnt, but you cant tell the whole world they will be conquered and then wait and expect them to say "aww, shucks. Where do surrender? And where do we sign up for the funds to retrofit our houses of worship to mosques?
    And most importantly will there be cookies? I was told there would be cookies.
    TOO LATE...
     

    Cameramonkey

    www.thechosen.tv
    Staff member
    Moderator
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    35   0   0
    May 12, 2013
    33,218
    77
    Camby area

    bwframe

    Loneranger
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    95   0   0
    Feb 11, 2008
    39,110
    113
    Btown Rural
    :rofl: Well, it's pretty much a guarantee now.

    That's funny, but it's laughing to keep from crying...


     

    Twangbanger

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    21   0   0
    Oct 9, 2010
    7,136
    113
    Talking with family over lunch yesterday the question came up over how LGBTQ and Palestinian flags could be in the same room, and I said they are both hip so any incompatibility is irrelevant. It seems that to hipsters, hip is the primary measure of everything. Two things that are promoted and idolized by hipsters can be mutually exclusive, but if both are hip for whatever reason, that's they only thing they are interested in.

    Somewhere in the beginning of this somebody has to define the hip of an idea, I'm wondering who and how.
    That's easy:

    Hip, adj.: 1. a quality of popularity of, or characteristic of, a group of people oppressed or denied special privileges by white American males with traditional beliefs, or of a group of people which predominantly votes Democrat.

    (Yes, I made that up)


    As you note, compatibility is not a component of this definition. As intensely as American Jews and Muslims may dislike each other, they may also feel equally put-upon by western WASP culture, and therefore acquire the property of "hipness" via both voting Democrat. There's no intrinsic violation of reason here, because people are free to decide for themselves who their most threatening political enemy is. If American Muslims observe that American Jews often vote Democrat, it does not follow that the Muslims' circumstances will be improved by voting Republican, nor does any sort of logic require them to do so. Similarly, logic does not require a third-party observer (such as a spoiled, rich Democrat Brat college student) to "pick sides" in the Jew-Muslim dispute. It is understood those two groups are united in their oppression by and opposition to white American males with traditional values, and therefore, the Democrat Brat is permitted by reason to "support" both of them, irrespective of any other differences they may have. Extending the concept a bit further, LGBTQ people supporting Palestinians is indeed a rich concept, but perhaps not when you consider the LGBTQ person may actually consider the white American male with traditional values to be the greater enemy. After all, these LGBTQ people aren't volunteering to go live in Gaza. They're going to stay right here, where their biggest "first world problem" is making sure they don't get mis-gendered, dead-named, or improperly pronoun-ed (is that a word?).

    Conservatives often fail to understand the concept of "hipness" because they don't grasp the powerful effect which can exist when two incompatible groups share a common enemy. The confusion arises at least in part because 1) identifying the "Common Enemy" is subjective, and 2) the "Common Enemy" concept is a one-way street: it "allows" to incompatible groups to be united in opposition to a common foe, but does not "require" it. For example, it is common for Republicans to assume that because Protestant Republicans and Catholic Latino Immigrants (supposedly) share a common enemy in Atheists, reason therefore dictates the Latinos should vote Republican. Experience simply does not bear this out. The Republican-voting Protestant considers the applicable Common Enemy to be "Atheists;" the Catholic Immigrant perceives the Common Enemy to be anyone who's not in favor of A) allowing the rest of their family to come here or B) voting them more free sxxt. Their perceived "enemy" isn't who the Republican Protestant thinks it "should" be.
     
    Last edited:

    phylodog

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    59   0   0
    Mar 7, 2008
    19,620
    113
    Arcadia
    It's really alarming that Britain can have such clear-headed people in it...and yet, the nitwits have still conquered the place.
    It's the left's favorite tactic. They choose their words more carefully than most conservatives choose their babysitters, it's a must when you spin lies for a living. As he pointed out, the goal isn't to hold Israel to any specific level of restraint, it's to slowly introduce BS lingo into the conversation early on to begin subtly steering opinion in the desired direction.

    The news as we once understood it is, was and always will be a charade.
     

    cobber

    Parrot Daddy
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    44   0   0
    Sep 14, 2011
    10,343
    149
    PR-WLAF




    93 million from Russia and 75 million for Biden.

    Not saying it wasn’t the Russians, but I seem to recall a dossier that intelligence experts assured us was the real deal, until we learned it wasn’t. And the experts still haven’t acknowledged they were wrong.
     
    Top Bottom