Gr666mer Updates

[AndreusMaximus]

Good thing your beliefs and morals dont make up our First Amendment.

So you really are fine with public display of nudity and pornographic material, even in places where children can see it?

If this is true, to be frank, it sickens me so much I scarcely even know how to continue a conversation with you without saying things I will regret.

 

[AndreusMaximus]

Maybe you should better educate yourself.
Pornagraphic material is nothing new to man.
Porn has been dated back to The Ramesside Period, The Turin Erotic Papyrus.
1292-1075 B.C.E.

I am well aware that such depravity has existed since the dawn of time. That doesn't make it any less evil.

Pornography, infanticide, abortion, pedophilia, homosexuality, and the whole host of perversions and evils that are seeing a resurgence in our modern day were, in fact, quite common in most ancient, pagan cultures. Just read some of the writings of ancient Greeks, for instance; Socrates was considered weird for not wanting to have sex with young boys.

 

[printcraft]

And were teachers taking children on field trips to those places without notifying parents?

Only if the field trip included a drive thru abortion clinic/sexual reassignment surgery center visit.

 

[DadSmith]

Maybe you should better educate yourself.
Pornagraphic material is nothing new to man.
Porn has been dated back to The Ramesside Period, The Turin Erotic Papyrus.
1292-1075 B.C.E.

So was human trafficking, rape of children, and all kinds of other immoral acts.
Our country was founded on Judeo Christian principles.
I'll tell you right now our founding fathers would have made things much more plain if they had known future generations would be so dumbed down on the subject of knowing what is right and what is wrong.

Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.

John Adams

 

[Creedmoor]

So you really are fine with public display of nudity and pornographic material, even in places where children can see it?

If this is true, to be frank, it sickens me so much I scarcely even know how to continue a conversation with you without saying things I will regret.

You just might want to look at some of our money over the years. Nudies everywhere.

This video deems appropriate.


Feel free to put me on ignore son.

 

[AndreusMaximus]

You just might want to look at some of our money over the years. Nudies everywhere.

This video deems appropriate.


Feel free to put me on ignore son.

Wow. So now you're going to conflate artistic representation of the human body with sexually explicit material designed to be erotic? If you can't tell the difference between the two you're honestly in need of some real help. But somehow I suspect you know the difference full well, and are just acting like you don't.

And are you honestly blind to the irony of deciding to poke fun at me with all the millenial stereotypes after complaining about how much people have assumed about your beliefs (despite never once providing an example of where your beliefs were misrepresented, even after being asked multiple times)?

No, I'm not going to put you on ignore. I've stood face to face in real life with people who have spit at me, cursed me out, and called me all sorts of names, and it never made me back down from defending what is right. Compared to that, your online provocation isn't the least bit vexing.

 

[Creedmoor]

Wow. So now you're going to conflate artistic representation of the human body with sexually explicit material designed to be erotic? If you can't tell the difference between the two you're honestly in need of some real help. But somehow I suspect you know the difference full well, and are just acting like you don't.

And are you honestly blind to the irony of deciding to poke fun at me with all the millenial stereotypes after complaining about how much people have assumed about your beliefs (despite never once providing an example of where your beliefs were misrepresented, even after being asked multiple times)?

No, I'm not going to put you on ignore. I've stood face to face in real life with people who have spit at me, cursed me out, and called me all sorts of names, and it never made me back down from defending what is right. Compared to that, your online provocation isn't the least bit vexing.

What You think is right. The Constitution is Right.
Make sure you get it Right now son, im not cursing or spitting on you.
Im laughing at you.

 

[AndreusMaximus]

What You think is right. The Constitution is Right.

What?

Make sure you get it Right now son, im not cursing or spitting on you.

Never said you were.

Im laughing at you.

I realized that.

 

[jamil]

My personal opinions are, Elementary and Junior High? Nope
High School 10-12th grade? Yes.

Now thats my personal opinion, if its deemed illegal the city,county or state should remove it.
I would guess the courts will figure it out.
So what other books need to be removed ir burned?
Its a slippery slope. Whats next?
Are great Books like,

Catcher and the Rye
Color Purple
Grapes of Wrath
Kill a Mockingbird
1984
Adventures of Huckleberry Finn,
Still in your kids school librarys?

It’s not a slippery slope at all. Why are you mentioning these other books? We’re talking about pornography. You know it when you see it. There’s a difference between rated R and rated X.

 

[GodFearinGunTotin]

It’s not a slippery slope at all. Why are you mentioning these other books? We’re talking about pornography. You know it when you see it. There’s a difference between rated R and rated X.

On late night cable the only difference is camera angle.

 

[AndreusMaximus]

What You think is right. The Constitution is Right.

I had initially hoped to get some clarification before responding to this little snippet, but if past experience is any indication, even if I do get a reply eventually, any real response to my questions is not likely to be forthcoming.

So, I just have to ask (only rhetorically, I'm afraid, at this point):

Is the same guy who relentlessly mocks Christians for only believing what their "book of morals" tells them

The same guy who brags about thinking on his own without needing the man in the pulpit to tell him what to think

Is this guy now seriously telling me I should discard what I think is right and wrong and instead go off of what is written in a two hundred year old document?

And all this because you think the Constitution gives people the right to show porn to children who are not even their own?

Boy, and just a few posts ago you were accusing others of being hypocrites.

(P.S. If that's not actually what you're saying, please explain to me what you did mean before throwing another pity party about how much people assume about your beliefs.)

 

[KLB]

On late night cable the only difference is camera angle.

That is pretty much the difference period.

 

[Route 45]

No, I'm not going to put you on ignore. I've stood face to face in real life with people who have spit at me, cursed me out, and called me all sorts of names, and it never made me back down from defending what is right. Compared to that, your online provocation isn't the least bit vexing.

Respect for this. Lots of whiny ass snowflakes on INGO who love to bleat “another one for the ignore list” when they read something that hurts their little feelings.

 

[jamil]

On late night cable the only difference is camera angle.

What is this late night cable you speak of? Asking for a friend.

 

[DadSmith]

What You think is right. The Constitution is Right.
Make sure you get it Right now son, im not cursing or spitting on you.
Im laughing at you.

So you are ignoring our past, and what the founders believed in. Go read what our founders believed.

People want the constitution to rule our country again. However, they want to ignore the fact it takes a moral, and religious people to keep it.
Sexual immorality is one of the reasons we are where we are today.
Lack of morality, and the fall of the church from teaching the truth.
There is only one way back to our past, and that is to live a righteous life, and self-governing.

 

[jamil]

So you are ignoring our past, and what the founders believed in. Go read what our founders believed.

People want the constitution to rule our country again. However, they want to ignore the fact it takes a moral, and religious people to keep it.
Sexual immorality is one of the reasons we are where we are today.
Lack of morality, and the fall of the church from teaching the truth.
There is only one way back to our past, and that is to live a righteous life, and self-governing.

I agree it takes a moral, primarily individualist, society for a constitutional republic to work. I don’t think it takes a religious society. But to whatever extent the extent that religion contributes to that, it is the morals that sustain a society that are important.

 

[DadSmith]

I agree it takes a moral, primarily individualist, society for a constitutional republic to work. I don’t think it takes a religious society. But to whatever extent the extent that religion contributes to that, it is the morals that sustain a society that are important.

Why I put righteous and self-governing.

righteous​

rī′chəs​

adjective​

1. Morally upright; without guilt or sin.
2. In accordance with virtue or morality: synonym: moral.

self-governing

adjective

self-gov·ern·ing ˌself-ˈgə-vər-niŋ
: having control or rule over oneself

 

[jamil]

I agree. I think it also requires an individualist world view.

Wokeness. It is a religion. It has a moral structure. It has a concept of righteousness. Of sin. It’s collectivist.

 

[Creedmoor]

I had initially hoped to get some clarification before responding to this little snippet, but if past experience is any indication, even if I do get a reply eventually, any real response to my questions is not likely to be forthcoming.

So, I just have to ask (only rhetorically, I'm afraid, at this point):

Is the same guy who relentlessly mocks Christians for only believing what their "book of morals" tells them

The same guy who brags about thinking on his own without needing the man in the pulpit to tell him what to think

Is this guy now seriously telling me I should discard what I think is right and wrong and instead go off of what is written in a two hundred year old document?

And all this because you think the Constitution gives people the right to show porn to children who are not even their own?

Boy, and just a few posts ago you were accusing others of being hypocrites.

(P.S. If that's not actually what you're saying, please explain to me what you did mean before throwing another pity party about how much people assume about your beliefs.)

So that book of morals you read is not how you supposedly run your life?


I believe the only personal view points I have posted here is im a Pro Choice - Pro Abortion,
Pro Constitution Conservative.
Other than that ones believes about me are meaningless.


Your entitled as an American to believe what you like, as am I. Have you traveled the world in those 30 odd years?

 

[Creedmoor]

So you are ignoring our past, and what the founders believed in. Go read what our founders believed.

People want the constitution to rule our country again. However, they want to ignore the fact it takes a moral, and religious people to keep it.
Sexual immorality is one of the reasons we are where we are today.
Lack of morality, and the fall of the church from teaching the truth.
There is only one way back to our past, and that is to live a righteous life, and self-governing.

And you actually believe that.