The primary purpose of the state is to protect its citizens' individual rights. That includes from harm by all enemies, foreign and domestic. When a few people can use the power of their large corporations to subvert the rights of citizens, I think if government is any good at all, it should step in and prevent it.The only thing I can think of is getting Trump back in office and having some sort of law passed against the enforcement of woke ideology, or something like that. There are no market forces that will sort it out, so it has to be something legislative. Either that or woke companies are forced out of business and eventually the woke will run out of money...
nypost.com
“Consumers have made a choice,” said an executive at a Texas-based beer distributor who did not want to be identified. “They have left [Bud Light] and that’s how it’s going to be. I don’t envision a big percentage of them coming back.”
Bud Light distributors no longer expect sales to recover from Dylan Mulvaney disaster
“Consumers have made a choice,” said an executive at a Texas-based beer distributor who did not want to be identified. “They have left [Bud Light] and that’s how it’s going to be.”…
I have been studying that and it is not as easy as it sounds. This was a perfect storm. We must learn to replicate it.And if we can do that to the best selling beer in America, we can do it to other companies playing this woke bull
www.aier.org
I have been studying that and it is not as easy as it sounds. This was a perfect storm. We must learn to replicate it.
“No one factor determines success, but they boil down to one key question: How expensive in time, money, or quality is it to switch to the nearest substitute for the target of the boycott? The more expensive it is to boycott, the less likely the boycott will succeed. What affects the costs of participating in a boycott? The answers to this question are simple: time, money, and quality.”
Not All Boycotts are Equal
"The more expensive it is to boycott, the less likely the boycott will succeed. What affects the costs of participating in a boycott? The answers to this question are simple: time, money, and quality." ~ Ramon DeGennaro
Desire is the largest obstacle.I have been studying that and it is not as easy as it sounds. This was a perfect storm. We must learn to replicate it.
“No one factor determines success, but they boil down to one key question: How expensive in time, money, or quality is it to switch to the nearest substitute for the target of the boycott? The more expensive it is to boycott, the less likely the boycott will succeed. What affects the costs of participating in a boycott? The answers to this question are simple: time, money, and quality.”
Not All Boycotts are Equal
"The more expensive it is to boycott, the less likely the boycott will succeed. What affects the costs of participating in a boycott? The answers to this question are simple: time, money, and quality." ~ Ramon DeGennaro
So with that said you basically said what the economist I quoted said, if the cost is too high the boycott will not succeed. People will not home school because the cost to them is to great for the benefit they believe they will get, so they rationalize and don’t do it. And the second point is the same, if the cost of boycotting is too great they will not do it.
Not necessarily too high a cost, just unwilling to give up something.
Giving up something is a cost in economics studies…
Can we do that to every single democrat in office everywhere? That would be a good start.And if we can do that to the best selling beer in America, we can do it to other companies playing this woke bull
I gave up having children (personal choice). That's how I chose to avoid home (and other) schooling costs. Oh I still have to pay for schooling costs through property taxes though. Is that enough of a sacrifice for you?
I went to the store today and passed through the beer isle. Bud Light occupied an extraordinary space compared to the other beers. I really don't understand that. You'd think they'd stick it in the middle of a main isle and put it on sale to get rid of it, and stock more popular beers in its space in the beer isle. Something's not adding up. But. I'm not a beer retailer. I may be missing something.“Consumers have made a choice,” said an executive at a Texas-based beer distributor who did not want to be identified. “They have left [Bud Light] and that’s how it’s going to be. I don’t envision a big percentage of them coming back.”
Bud Light distributors no longer expect sales to recover from Dylan Mulvaney disaster
“Consumers have made a choice,” said an executive at a Texas-based beer distributor who did not want to be identified. “They have left [Bud Light] and that’s how it’s going to be.”…
Well. The beer worked out I think because most beer is beer. Hell, I drank Goebel back in my drinking days. It's not always about the taste. I drank it in my college days because it was cheap and I was usually broke. But I think for most people it's a brand loyalty thing. Having the brand of beer you're loyal to insult you like Bud Light marketing did, kinda puts the skids on the whole loyalty thing.And if we can do that to the best selling beer in America, we can do it to other companies playing this woke bull
The part you are missing is that most grocery items placement is per negotiated contract. In other words the vendor pays for that space, in many cases down to the particular shelf height and distance from the end caps.
