...it is very tricky to have these rules that will impact a very specific group of people in a negative way.
Maybe its not really discriminatory, as it is a disproportionate impact. But to me I see all kinds of red flags when only the poor people in urban areas would be negatively effected by this.
That's great, if eats through concrete its has to be good for your teeth and body
So, we are doing this to save the poor? To let them thrive? Add more debt to society? More handouts for them?
If it saves just one poor person, then it's worth it....right?
Is this true? Is fluoride a water cleaning agent?We collectively pollute the water to the point that it is darn near undrinkable in urban areas, so in my mind we are responsible to collectively clean it back up.
To anyone:
Are good teeth worth the risk of knocking years off of your life?
Possible cavities? Or possible cancer, osteoporosis, dementia, thyroid disease, bone problems, arthritis, brain damage? All these things are linked to ingesting fluoride.
Those things are also linked with breathing air.
Drinking sodium fluoride is as natural and necessary to you as breathing air.
Its settled then. I must be forced to drink it.
You're killing the conspiracy buzz, now he has go back on Yahoo and dig for the next juicy .GOV problem. He's dying before our very eyes!BTW, correlation does not necessarily imply causation
All things in moderation, my friend, all things in moderation.
BTW, correlation does not necessarily imply causation
This is on every tube of toothpaste.
I bet you could eat a bar of soap and not have to worry about calling poison control though.
My mother would take that bet. She has seen first hand what a little bit of soap in my mouth will do. I do not stand a chance of making it through an entire bar of soap before it becomes a self fixing problem .