BehindBlueI's
Grandmaster
- Oct 3, 2012
- 26,608
- 113
No. I am mad because they are too dumb to realize they are being played by special interest groups. The result of their demands, if met, will raise the cost of goods & services people buy to compensate for their pay, which raises overall cost of living and then I will make even less than I do (relative to COL), until I am forced to join them to put food on our table.
I think we've been over this multiple times on INGO.
1) Labor is a small portion of the cost of most goods. I'm not doing the research and math again, I've already posted on INGO specifics.
2) Prices are not set by the cost of making the product. You go to buy shoes. You like pair "A" and pair "B" but only want one pair. Does "how much did this cost to make" enter your decision making process? No, of course not, you neither know nor care. As such the price of the good does not affect demand. Now, let's say shoe "A" used to cost $10 to make and they sell every pair they can manufacture. They automate, get price breaks on raw material, etc. and their costs go down to $5. Do they lower the retail price $5? Of course not. The market is already supporting the current price. The market (via supply/demand) sets price. Profitability might change. New entrants to the market might change...but that doesn't affect supply on non-fungible goods.
3) What people think is the free market is generally not the free market. Can you go open a McDonald's and sell Big Macs? No, unless you pay for a franchise and become part of the McDonald's business structure. McDonalds has a monopoly on Big Macs, but they can't sell Whoppers. Restaurants are generally competitive monopolies. The supply side is not as fluid as a true free market or commodity markets. Price fluctuations for Big Macs does not affect the availability of Big Macs (supply) but will effect demand, although to what extent depends on how many people decide another food item is a good substitute.
4) Wages injected at the lower end of the economy get spent at a higher percentage rate than at the higher end. Money is to the economy what water is to a mill. If it ain't moving, it ain't doing any work.
5) Real wages for most workers, from the low end to the middle, have dropped over the past few decades and the rate is increasing.
6) Nobody is arguing this should be a career or its anything but entry level. However, people willing to work should at least make enough to support themselves. We, as taxpayers, subsidize these employers who do not pay a living wage via social benefits. IMO, its smarter, more efficient, and increases the incentive to work for the employer to bear the burden of paying an employee enough to live on. $15 is likely too much for that bare minimum of replacement cost, and will vary based on location. Everytime this comes up people get hung up on $15. That's how negotiations work. Start with a goal, negotiate from there.