Evansville Sued for Violating Gun Owner's Rights

[GBuck]

Haha.. So there is a guy commenting on the new Editorial under the name "BumperMorgan" that is claiming to be Irahm. Why don't I believe it? Why would an officer comment on a news article on an ongoing civil case?

ALSO, correct me if I'm wrong, he claims to have asked to see his LTCH '7-8' times and TF refused? I was under the impression that carrying a handgun IS a crime and the defense against charges is a valid LTCH. Therefore, isn't it required that if asked to see it, once they're aware you're carrying, you show it? I would think that TF and a police officer would be aware of this, but perhaps not.

 

[AndersonIN]

I like where Sarah G comment "BTW, I'm a registered gun owner and possess a lifetime carry permit.".................ah Sarah EXACTLY where and with whom did you REGISTER your gun???? LOL Talk about a FOOL!

 

[GBuck]

I like the guy that said you have to register your AK with the feds and pay $500 periodically to maintain your license.

 

[KG1]

Haha.. So there is a guy commenting on the new Editorial under the name "BumperMorgan" that is claiming to be Irahm. Why don't I believe it? Why would an officer comment on a news article on an ongoing civil case?

ALSO, correct me if I'm wrong, he claims to have asked to see his LTCH '7-8' times and TF refused? I was under the impression that carrying a gun IS a crime and the defense against charges is a valid LTCH. Therefore, isn't it required that if asked to see it, once they're aware you're carrying, you show it? I would think that TF and a police officer would be aware of this, but perhaps not.

I'm pretty sure from reading a lot of T_F's posts he is aware that an LTCH is required to be presented to a proper LEO upon request.

 

[pirate]

The comments are great down below. Someone actually thinks it costs $500 to keep an ak variant licensed each year.


Not to mention the many "permit" and "assault rifle" quips.

 

[bwframe]

I would think Mr. Relford would be writing a counter to this for publication?

 

[WebHobbit]

I'm hitting the comment section of that ridiculous opinion piece HARD. Anyone care to join me?

 

[AndersonIN]

I'm hitting the comment section of that ridiculous opinion piece HARD. Anyone care to join me?

In deep right now but I'm new to the sight so my comments have to be approved first.

I suggested they read they're own rules as to me the piece was defamatory, rude and inconsiderate!! The exact thing they say they'll ban you for!

 

[WebHobbit]

It's showing up now



Come on people lets flood this thing!

Direct linkage:

http://www.courierpress.com/news/2012/sep/18/gun-owner-proves-an-embarrassment-to-his-very/

 

[WebHobbit]

We need to dig up Rahm's posts here on Ingo and LINK that up in that comment section!

 

[GBuck]

We need to dig up Rahm's posts here on Ingo and LINK that up in that comment section!

It seems that may be in poor form, and could possibly cause him some problems at work or elsewhere.

 

[Bunnykid68]

It seems that may be in poor form, and could possibly cause him some problems at work or elsewhere.

Then he shouldnt be posting about T_Frost then should he?

 

[WebHobbit]

It seems that may be in poor form, and could possibly cause him some problems at work or elsewhere.

Well then someone needs to reach out to him and let him see what this imposter is saying over there....assuming it IS an imposter.

 

[GBuck]

Then he shouldnt be posting about T_Frost then should he?

It's just a suspicion, but I'm pretty confident that the person commenting on the editorial is NOT Rahm. Why would an officer comment on a news story about an ongoing civil case? There are other things that DO NOT add up.

 

[Bunnykid68]

It's just a suspicion, but I'm pretty confident that the person commenting on the editorial is NOT Rahm. Why would an officer comment on a news story about an ongoing civil case? There are other things that DO NOT add up.

Did you look at any of that persons other 400 posts? Seems like they are at least an officer

 

[WebHobbit]

They just REMOVED SarahG's posts! Wonder why? She supported their position.

 

[WebHobbit]

Did you look at any of that persons other 400 posts? Seems like they are at least an officer

I noticed that. He's a cop alright.

 

[stephen87]

He claims to be high enough that the "attaboys," as he calls them, come to his desk.

 

[Bunnykid68]

They just REMOVED SarahG's posts! Wonder why? She supported their position.

ANy idea what she said that caused it to be removed?

 

[WebHobbit]

I wish I had copy an pasted it somewhere! She basically agreed with the paper and slammed Ben while adding that she is a 'registered gun owner' and lifetime carry permit holder.