Yes it would have been. I'm not arguing that fact at all, nor have I ever.You're way overreaching anything I'm trying to convey... I think my words are coming out in Swahili on that end.
Bottom line: Reporter had no way of knowing WHAT those dogs were going to do, and any defensive action she took would have been justified.
I'm simply saying that shooting is not the route that I would have taken or advised in the situation.
However, Had she been familiar with dog behavior then she would have known what they were going to do.
They barked. Bark = threat, bite = intent
Hence, bark = no shoot
She did NOT know in the sense that she wasn't familiar with dog behavior. So, we simply interpreting "know" differently and I was assimilating what I know to what she "knows."