Yep.. Your personal feelings will keep me up at night.. If people kept their animals and pets contained and under control, you would never know about those that don't tolerate that behavior.
I bet those two women would have been very happy if someone intervened with a firearm when they were getting mauled..
What do you think ?
So you would have just drove by and not pulled over and intervened ?
Maybe it's a dumb question, but who wouldn't take pride in saving someone's life? Even if it means I have to kill Fido.
The last one that bit me was a Chow, one of us is alive.
That dog smelled my hands when we met and as I walked up the front steps it circled around behind me and bit me around the knee..
I shot it.. Then and there.
There's nothing wrong with saving someone from harm or death. It's when someone simply decides that when he gets bit it's time to break out the gun and shoot something.
There's nothing wrong with saving someone from harm or death. It's when someone simply decides that when he gets bit it's time to break out the gun and shoot something.
'Merica!
And maybe an animal shouldn't bite you if it wants to live. My grandfather's dog bit me on my face when I was a kid. He let it live. Then it bit my cousin. It never made it back from that last walk into the woods. I'm thinking my cousin would've appreciated the dog being put down after it bit me.
Apparently Pappy liked your cousin more!
There's nothing wrong with saving someone from harm or death. It's when someone simply decides that when he gets bit it's time to break out the gun and shoot something.
Let me tell you a quick story. About a year and a half ago, I got two puppies from my brother, male and a female. That female, as she grew up, always had a scared/mean streak in her. Always barking and snarling at people along the fence, and she went after her bother unprovoked several times. In the space of two months, she had bit my brother and a trainer deep enough to draw blood. My wife wanted one more chance to break her of it, and I stupidly gave in. A month later, she nipped at a neighborhood kid. Didn't draw blood, but I flat out told my wife either we took the dog and put it down, or I'd take it out to the woods and do it myself. It had proven that it could not be broken or trained. We had tried everything with that dog - trainers, clicker training, hell even a shock collar. It wasn't a question of if she would attack anyone, but when. I did the responsible thing and took that away from her.
Some dogs are trained badly, yes. I get that there are good dogs raised by bad people. But some are just plain evil. Either way, if I see a dog attacking my child, that dog will not live past the end of that encounter, be it by a bullet or my bare hands. Period, end of sentence. Any dog that bites hard enough to draw blood unprovoked is a danger and should be eliminated.
I would most certainly have intervened, much to the detriment of the dogs. Simply because a dog bites me I'm not going to light it up. If it continues to do so then, yes. Fido is going to have a few new holes in himself.
Don't fret about it, your thoughts and feeling are the furthest thing from my mind once I click away from this thread.
So Arthur, now I'm at a loss, are we supposed to preemptively shoot the dog before we get bit then ??
Or wait until its all over and then shot the animal or wait for the dog catcher / policeman to take it away and him / her send it to never never land ??
So if biting is not a reason to put down a animal, what would YOU do to stop a animal that is attacking,maiming, disfiguring a human or other animal.
Call Peta ??
There's nothing wrong with saving someone from harm or death. It's when someone simply decides that when he gets bit it's time to break out the gun and shoot something.[/QUOTE]
I'll ask again, So when Arthur in your opinion when and how do YOU yourself intervene when someone has or is being bitten or the attack is still going on.
You seem to be contradictory in your statements here.
There's nothing wrong with saving someone from harm or death. It's when someone simply decides that when he gets bit it's time to break out the gun and shoot something.[/QUOTE]
I'll ask again, So when Arthur in your opinion when and how do YOU yourself intervene when someone has or is being bitten or the attack is still going on.
You seem to be contradictory in your statements here.
I'll answer you, again. Nothing contradictory about it.
If you or someone else is getting mauled go ahead and shoot it. Some dogs bite because they are territorial, like Chows. Shoot whatever you want whenever you want. Don't let me stop you.
I guess Arthur you just can't grasp the topic of " YOU " not me and not other people.. My question asks what would YOU do.
I'll ask again, So when Arthur in your opinion when and how do YOU yourself intervene when someone has or is being bitten or the attack is still going on
Chows bite becaus they are the spawn of Satan.If you or someone else is getting mauled go ahead and shoot it. Some dogs bite because they are territorial, like Chows. Shoot whatever you want whenever you want. Don't let me stop you.
Depends on the situation. There is no one size fits all solution to everything.