Do you FULLY support the 2nd amendment?

[rambone]

I guess I'm gonna have to come down on the no side. I couldn't swing a dead cat around here without hitting somebody I don't think should own a gun. I drive through my town, what used to be a true "small town" and just shake my head anymore. Any of you who answered yes, think of this thread the next time you're out at, say, walmart, or just about any place that people gather, look at some of the trash you see, and ask yourself if they should be able to walk around with a firearm. Just try it, then post again in this thread, and be honest. I'm sure I'll get flamed for this, but I just don't think people try to live up to the same standards they did even as recently as 30 or 40 years ago, and it seems to be getting worse every day. Some people just don't seem to give a flying **** anymore, and fortunately, most of em are too dumb to fill out the forms to buy a gun.

If people have changed in the past 30-40 years, it is because more of their freedom has been taken and they are government-worshiping sheep who enjoy socialism & gun-control.

Arizona is a free state with constitutional carry. Does it scare you to go there? Any of those dumb ****ers could be carrying.

 

[dross]

How about this: Violent felons can have guns, but if a violent felon gets shot by a law-abiding citizen, it should be an automatic assumption of the law that the violent felon was at fault, if he was armed.

 

[infidel]

No.

 

[littletommy]

If people have changed in the past 30-40 years, it is because more of their freedom has been taken and they are government-worshiping sheep who enjoy socialism & gun-control.

Arizona is a free state with constitutional carry. Does it scare you to go there? Any of those dumb ****ers could be carrying.

Yes, I'm extremely frightened of Arizona. It's very hot there, they have those cactus thingy's that have pointy spikes on them, and I've heard there is even illegal ALIENS there.

 

[Expat]

I've heard there is even illegal ALIENS there.

I thought Roswell was in New Mexico...

 

[littletommy]

I thought Roswell was in New Mexico...

Me too, I guess we are both wrong.

 

[gglass]

110%

 

[Blue Tile Spook]

There was a time when a person could walk into a hardware store and buy a case of TNT.

 

[PatriotPride]

How about this: Violent felons can have guns, but if a violent felon gets shot by a law-abiding citizen, it should be an automatic assumption of the law that the violent felon was at fault, if he was armed.

No. I think your intention is good though. This is too prejudiced a procedure to implement, and does not afford due process to the felon.

THE NEXT GREAT INGO GROUP BUY!!!! lol I hope it comes with instructions, cuz I only know how to drive tracked vehicles

Haven't you heard? We have to go to other forum to do GB now.

 

[Praetorian13]

How about this: Violent felons can have guns, but if a violent felon gets shot by a law-abiding citizen, it should be an automatic assumption of the law that the violent felon was at fault, if he was armed.

Very True, just like the old days(in the west) where if a person was trying to rob you or steal your property, they got shot no questions asked.

 

[XMil]

There was a time when a person could walk into a hardware store and buy a case of TNT.

And they could walk into a drug store and buy morphine.

 

[hookedonjeep]

Yes. No restrictions, what so ever. As far as whether or not one "needs" explosive ordinances, probably not. However, does one "need" to own a truck or SUV? No. But God bless the free market, if you have the cash, you can have what you want.....

 

[Praetorian13]

Yes. No restrictions, what so ever. As far as whether or not one "needs" explosive ordinances, probably not. However, does one "need" to own a truck or SUV? No. But God bless the free market, if you have the cash, you can have what you want.....

Of course, The President....he needs 20 of them to go to Starbucks

 

[jimbo-indy]

I say take the Federal government back to the powers it had about 1830 or so. Back before that radical federalist, Lincoln, infringed on state's rights.
Notice the above is NOT purple, I'm serious.
What part of the 10th amendment is so hard to understand?

 

[cqcn88]

I'm all for the 2nd amendment. 100%, no restrictions. It should be up to society to deal with people that abuse their rights, like using guns in criminal acts. If everyone is carrying, most criminals will stop and rethink their planned actions, and those ballsy enough to try will get themselves killed.

I think teachers should be issued handguns, just like LEO's. LEO's have guns to defend against violent criminals. School's are the most vulnerable places in the state, because it is well known that there are zero guns there. Defenseless.

I believe guns should be allowed on planes (low velocity calibers only, due to the risk of damaging the airplane at high altitude, multiplying the danger to innocent people).

Gun laws simply DO NOT WORK and only restrict law abiding citizens. I also believe that the reason the vast majority of the population is so ignorant when it comes to firearms and safety is because the vast majority of the population has not had enough exposure to guns. Why? Because its difficult for citizens to get guns, and who wants to bother with the paperwork and pay the fees? If guns were on the open market and unrestricted, I FULLY believe that crimes would go down, gun ownership would go up, and general knowledge of firearms would increase. It might take awhile for all the stupid people to catch up, but it would eventually sort itself out. Think long term here.

Also, I'm actually a little appalled at some of the people's comments that support partial gun control. What makes you so special that you deserve the right to have guns, but other people don't? I call arrogance and a "holier than thou" attitude, and I can't support it.

 

[PatriotPride]

I'm all for the 2nd amendment. 100%, no restrictions. It should be up to society to deal with people that abuse their rights, like using guns in criminal acts. If everyone is carrying, most criminals will stop and rethink their planned actions, and those ballsy enough to try will get themselves killed.

I think teachers should be issued handguns, just like LEO's. LEO's have guns to defend against violent criminals. School's are the most vulnerable places in the state, because it is well known that there are zero guns there. Defenseless.

I believe guns should be allowed on planes (low velocity calibers only, due to the risk of damaging the airplane at high altitude, multiplying the danger to innocent people).

Gun laws simply DO NOT WORK and only restrict law abiding citizens. I also believe that the reason the vast majority of the population is so ignorant when it comes to firearms and safety is because the vast majority of the population has not had enough exposure to guns. Why? Because its difficult for citizens to get guns, and who wants to bother with the paperwork and pay the fees? If guns were on the open market and unrestricted, I FULLY believe that crimes would go down, gun ownership would go up, and general knowledge of firearms would increase. It might take awhile for all the stupid people to catch up, but it would eventually sort itself out. Think long term here.

Also, I'm actually a little appalled at some of the people's comments that support partial gun control. What makes you so special that you deserve the right to have guns, but other people don't? I call arrogance and a "holier than thou" attitude, and I can't support it.

Don't forget the frangible ammo for airplanes. Minimizes risk of overpenetration, even with a .357

 

[beararms1776]

I support it. It's useless and a waste of time to stand against people who commit criminal acts with firearms and really shouldn't have guns. If they really want one, they'll get it. Let the law and citizens sort them out.

 

[Timjoebillybob]

I fully support the 2nd amendment, and that is how I voted. I can possibly see only a few laws regarding it. One being minors, I can understand and would support a law prohibiting a minor from purchasing a firearm without parental or other guardian permission. Same for the mentally deficient or mentally ill, if the person that is responsible for them doesn't want them having firearms it should be up to them.

I believe guns should be allowed on planes (low velocity calibers only, due to the risk of damaging the airplane at high altitude, multiplying the danger to innocent people).

The risk of damaging the plane has been discussed here before. Unless it is a 4 seat puddle jumper the chances of a firearm round disabling the plane is virtually nil and even in most puddle jumpers it is unlikely. It would take numerous spots in exact locations to do it.

If your talking about the risk of over penetration and hitting another passenger, you can argue for the same restrictions for any place other people would be.

 

[Lobb40118]

YES!!! Up to and including giving firearms back to convicted felons after they serve their sentence. Because if they were not safe enough to be on the street, then why were they let out? We should also be able to own any weapon the governemt owns, including nukes.

 

[infidel]

Nukes FTW