My friends and I, all freshman at Indiana University Bloomington, drove up to Broad Ripple today to see a friend at Crackers Comedy Club. On the drive back we were stopped by an LEO on State Road 37 between County Line and Fairview IIRC about 11pm. He had his car stopped in the right lane and was standing next to his car with his hand up. There was a car or two in front of us. There was a truck, and behind it an SUV, stopped on the shoulder. I figured it might have been an accident. Then I spotted the deer, a doe, laying across the dotted line in front of the LEO's cruiser, legs in the left lane, body in the right, head facing traffic; I'm assuming one of the vehicles hit the deer although I did not notice any damage to either vehicle. The LEO was standing left of the deer, the civilian to the right. The civilian bent down and touched the deer trying to get a reaction. The deer laid still. The whole time I was thinking, "If this deer jumps up, this dude is about to have a bad day." The LEO and civilian exchanged words. The LEO then stepped back 6-7 feet from the deer and fired a round into the deer from his duty pistol, I can only assume it was a 9mm or .40S&W caliber Glock. Do cops use JHPs? I'm assuming so. The deer was riled by the pistol bullet to her side. She was seemingly trying to get to her feet, but ended up convulsing on the ground as if having a seizure for a good 5-10 seconds. Eventually the deer stopped shaking the LEO allowed the stopped cars to pass in the left lane. As we passed, I noticed the round looked to have struck the deer a little high and forward of the heart.
By the way, this was a Sheriff (inferring based on the brown jacket and tan pants).
I have included a hand-drawn diagram of the situation below.
I was asked by my friends in the car why the LEO did not just shoot the deer in the head. I responded saying that deer have thick skulls and there would be a high probability of ricochet in a dangerous direction, and would therefore be negligent and unsafe. I actually have no clue if that's why deer aren't shot in the head, but I assumed this was a fairly safe assumption.
So, there's the story. Could someone clarify why we shoot deer in the heart and lungs and not the head, is it a law, unspoken rule, or just a preference by hunters wanting to mount the heads?
Thanks in advance for the answers.
Sincerely,
Eric M.
Edit: photo does not show from my computer so here is the link:
http://s1272.beta.photobucket.com/user/epmarlow/media/image_zps20bc10c7.jpg.html
By the way, this was a Sheriff (inferring based on the brown jacket and tan pants).
I have included a hand-drawn diagram of the situation below.
I was asked by my friends in the car why the LEO did not just shoot the deer in the head. I responded saying that deer have thick skulls and there would be a high probability of ricochet in a dangerous direction, and would therefore be negligent and unsafe. I actually have no clue if that's why deer aren't shot in the head, but I assumed this was a fairly safe assumption.
So, there's the story. Could someone clarify why we shoot deer in the heart and lungs and not the head, is it a law, unspoken rule, or just a preference by hunters wanting to mount the heads?
Thanks in advance for the answers.
Sincerely,
Eric M.
Edit: photo does not show from my computer so here is the link:
http://s1272.beta.photobucket.com/user/epmarlow/media/image_zps20bc10c7.jpg.html
Last edited: