For those of you who own, carry, or have shot both, which do you prefer and why?
If Glock, is it mainly based on track record and reliability despite other shortcomings (ergos, trigger, small trigger guard)?
If CZ, is it mainly based on ergonomics, trigger and a larger trigger guard despite some of it's own shortcomings?
I ask because I have a Gen5 19 that is my EDC. It's the best feeling and shooting Glock I have ever owned. However, I still find myself having to rotate/twist my hand to work around the grip to get my trigger finger placed correctly on the trigger. I've gotten more acquainted with doing this, but it still bugs me that I have to do it at all and admittedly isn't a 100% natural thing for me. If I don't do this I will pull shots left. Add in the smaller trigger guard that causes my trigger finger to drag the inside bottom edge while pulling the trigger and the issue can compound, especially with a gloved hand. This has been an issue with every Glock I've ever shot, except the single stack 42 & 43. I do much better with a thinner grip and an enlarged trigger guard when it comes to this area. That being said, I still believe Glock is a very solid and reliable platform. I love the availability of holsters, sights and the inexpensive cost of mags (especially the Magpuls). I was super pumped to get a Gen5, but the last few weeks I have really been opening my eyes to something else that might be better for me, I think.
Which brings me to the CZ P10C. I like the trigger, trigger guard and ergos much better. I like that it's a Glock 19 size, because I've always been a big fan of compacts and that it can fit in 19 holsters (not all from what I've read). Things I don't like are the smaller sights (it's a CZ thing, I'm well aware) and lack of larger easier to pick up aftermarket sights, my favorite holster manufacturer doesn't make one for it (Raven Concealment Morrigan) and the slightly higher cost of mags. Add in a track record that isn't proven yet, is it?. My G19 holster might fit, but I have no way of checking unless I buy the CZ. I don't know that I want to replace the 19 with the CZ necessarily either, but I'm currently in this mindset that I don't need more than 2 defensive handguns, one for nightstand and one for carry (I just traded my nightstand gun, a 17 gen5, for an FN 509).
I know this all sounds super nit picky and probably stupid to most, but lend me your thoughts and insight Ingo.
If Glock, is it mainly based on track record and reliability despite other shortcomings (ergos, trigger, small trigger guard)?
If CZ, is it mainly based on ergonomics, trigger and a larger trigger guard despite some of it's own shortcomings?
I ask because I have a Gen5 19 that is my EDC. It's the best feeling and shooting Glock I have ever owned. However, I still find myself having to rotate/twist my hand to work around the grip to get my trigger finger placed correctly on the trigger. I've gotten more acquainted with doing this, but it still bugs me that I have to do it at all and admittedly isn't a 100% natural thing for me. If I don't do this I will pull shots left. Add in the smaller trigger guard that causes my trigger finger to drag the inside bottom edge while pulling the trigger and the issue can compound, especially with a gloved hand. This has been an issue with every Glock I've ever shot, except the single stack 42 & 43. I do much better with a thinner grip and an enlarged trigger guard when it comes to this area. That being said, I still believe Glock is a very solid and reliable platform. I love the availability of holsters, sights and the inexpensive cost of mags (especially the Magpuls). I was super pumped to get a Gen5, but the last few weeks I have really been opening my eyes to something else that might be better for me, I think.
Which brings me to the CZ P10C. I like the trigger, trigger guard and ergos much better. I like that it's a Glock 19 size, because I've always been a big fan of compacts and that it can fit in 19 holsters (not all from what I've read). Things I don't like are the smaller sights (it's a CZ thing, I'm well aware) and lack of larger easier to pick up aftermarket sights, my favorite holster manufacturer doesn't make one for it (Raven Concealment Morrigan) and the slightly higher cost of mags. Add in a track record that isn't proven yet, is it?. My G19 holster might fit, but I have no way of checking unless I buy the CZ. I don't know that I want to replace the 19 with the CZ necessarily either, but I'm currently in this mindset that I don't need more than 2 defensive handguns, one for nightstand and one for carry (I just traded my nightstand gun, a 17 gen5, for an FN 509).
I know this all sounds super nit picky and probably stupid to most, but lend me your thoughts and insight Ingo.