Question/concern. I noticed that this thread was pretty slow to load. Maybe just coincidence but will the addition of graphic heavy sigs potentially slow the system down?
Looks badass to me. Only other suggestion is if you could incorporate the Blue line badge. Maybe have it in the center of the piece in a semi transparent fashion, so the flag design comes through it. If not, this looks awesome as is ...
Question/concern. I noticed that this thread was pretty slow to load. Maybe just coincidence but will the addition of graphic heavy sigs potentially slow the system down?
It's not the sig lines, it's all the graphics to be incorporated that are slow loading.
A 500x150 will load fairly quick, and once it's in your cache it'll load just like the INGO header.
I used to be on a Battlefield 1942 site that everyone had sig lines and it loaded fine every time I visited and it had no where near 5% the bandwidth INGO has.
Here You go Hammer
Try this on for size. The badge in the middle looked out of place, but I think this looks good.
This is being talked about. Fenway has discussed making the sigs a little smaller in height. I'm not sure if the reasoning is for performance or not, but signatures should not make the pages load any differently. At least not noticebly. I'm still waiting for the reply to see if the size will stay at 500x150.
-Ethan
Ethan, when these are done, can I adjust the size myself? I would prefer something smaller.
One for tonight, I should have the others finished tomorrow night .
Que, yours is amazing! They all look great!
Were my pictures no good??
Actually I really liked them all, but they work better separately imo so I picked the AR (If your brightness is turned down, it may be hard to see). I thought it looked cool lol
If you don't care for it, I can redo it. Just PM me what you have in mind.
Appreciate the reputation and comments guys