This is it. So who the **** is going to enforce treason? I'm more pissed off today than I've been for a hell of a long time. This right here is what bothers me. He is about to commit treason. His dependents will back him, riots will break out if treason/impeachment becomes a thing.
Not really worried about the EO on what I already own. What bothers me is what the suppliers are going to do with our back orders on AR parts and finished uppers? Would a finished upper be considered a assault weapon?
According to the US Constitution he would not be committing Treason
"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted."
He would be breaking his oath.
He would be attempting to produce legislation outside of the powers of his office.
Is that impeachable, yes
Is it treason? No
Unfortunately the MB has not been declared an Enemy of the State, and we are not at war with them. There.Foreign aid to muslim brotherhood.
There.
Unfortunately the MB has not been declared an Enemy of the State, and we are not at war with them. There.
Besides, the word Treason was bandied about in the context of unconstitutional EO's. I merely pointed out that it was not treason by definition.
An EO gun ban is not possible. A gun ban takes an act of congress. All Obama could hope to accomplish with an EO is to emphasize the importance of enforcing established laws better.
Rush, just now on if Congress would raise the case to impeach:
"Don't hold your breath."
****ing wonderful.
You will then be a criminal and will most likely end up where criminals belong.
Not true. Obama has effectively changed the law and enforcement of it with EO's in the past. He believes he is king, and will try so again.
You will then be a criminal and will most likely end up where criminals belong.
BS... you would be a Patriot. I'm not giving up anything... no where, no way.
You know the Brits said the same thing to the colonists and how well that worked out......
I will NEVER comply with ANY Unconstitutional weapons ban or magazine limits, NOTHING at all!
Gunner
Disarmament or preventing Americans from being armed would Aid and give comfort to our enemy... Terror (and Terrorists). Last I checked, we are "at war with Terror".According to the US Constitution he would not be committing Treason
"Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court. The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted."
He would be breaking his oath.
He would be attempting to produce legislation outside of the powers of his office.
Is that impeachable, yes
Is it treason? No
The EO will be valid for whatever he issues if Congress sits on it's ass and does nothing about it.
FWIW, back in the day, Chief justice Warren said something like: "When the legislature enacts an unconstitutional law it acts lawlessly, and the individual citizen is free to go about his or her business as if such a law didn't exist." If it's lawless for congress to enact unconstitutional anti-gun laws, it's doubly lawless for obey-me to use an EO to usurp congress' legislative authority to do it. I heard on the radio that a congressman (KY?) was preparing papers to impeach obey-me if he tried it.