I do not care about leg room in the back, but I wish there were a stink barrier between front and back.
Never smelled one that was occupied by a back seat passenger but I bet it can get bad. I road a greyhound bus before if that counts
I do not care about leg room in the back, but I wish there were a stink barrier between front and back.
Wow!! Him being in his underwear made it so much better, lol
Didn't Chevy gamble on something like this? Didn't they discontinue the Caprice Interceptors thinking that the cops would buy Blazers?
The police model Tahoe (2wd) will outperform the Crown Vic and the NM state police used one to PIT a school bus.
they came out with a police package lumina around that time too
they came out with a police package lumina around that time too
I do not care about leg room in the back, but I wish there were a stink barrier between front and back.
Meh......I didnt say anyone was a criminal. I simply said that I wish there were a barrier. the vast majority of individuals riding in my back seat do not smell like rose petals...
Ford has stopped producing their Crown Victoria Fleet altogether so what Ford Interceptors you see out there, is all that's left.
R.I.P. P71s
Well, don't really see much of an advantage if the SUV's not gonna have 4wd / AWD.
To me, it's just a cost factor. I suppose it's 'cool' to have tons of gee-gaws and doo-dads. But not when communities are on a tight dollar, as MOST are in this current era.
FWIW, when looking at any sort of cruiser, one of the primary considerations should be front interior width, seat width, etc. As noted above, wearing a Sam Browne with a sidearm on one side, radio on the other, mag / speedloader pouches, handcuff case(es), etc. makes an Officer about 8" or so 'wider' at the hips than in street clothes.
I agree additional room needs to be a consideration, but one of the PRIMARY points should be room behind the wheel, 'cause you know that someone's going to be sitting there if that vehicle's in operation.
I don't see the need for 'ninja' wheels or other such trivialities UNLESS it's necessary to the function of the vehicle. Cruisers don't need to 'look cool', unless that's a side benefit. Their first priority is function.
Of course, I only see a VERY limited need for un-marked cars. With RARE exception, ALL police vehicles should be conspicuously marked. Nor do I see ANY need for 'covert' cars EXCEPT for decided undercover work. No traffic or patrol Mustangs, Camaros, etc.
Nor do I see much need, for MOST police, for camo, 'ninja' BDU's, etc. Police aren't 'black ops', or 'covert' work, nor 'spies', nor 'James Bond', nor 'ninjas', for the vast majority of police work. They represent their community, and should look like the 'most upstanding' of citizens, not thugs, gang-members, or ninjas. WAY too much of that nowadays, and for NO justifiable reason.
I never understood why they have the police mustangs in indiana. Dont they get sketchy in the winter?
I agree with whoever posted above about the 4x4.
If your gonna go with a truck or SUV then go with the 4x4/awd