You say this like there's an absolute universal standard against which every human who chooses to carry will use in determine whether to OC or CC. Are you that daft? That's like me saying that the benefits to driving an eight thousand pound crew cab superduty far outweigh the benefits of a passenger sedan....unless of course you want to park in a garage in downtown Indy with a 6' clearance, want to get more than 15-18mpg, are afraid of large vehicles, don't want to $.40 more per gallon of fuel. So, no, the benefits of CC do not outweigh the benefits of OC. They only do that for you based on your priorities and personal preferences.
So what you're saying is that people who don't do it your way aren't fit to do it at all? Arrogant much?
That's what I think of your posts.
The only thing telling is your rudimentary grasp of logic.
That would matter to me if I gave damn what others thought.
I bet you don't either because most OCers recognize your weaksauce BS for what it is. Why bother answering a question which is based on a completely fallacious premise in the first place? Particularly when it's so much more fun to point out the absurdity of your thought process.
Iknowright. I thought you would have recognized your inferiority sooner and given up. Props for perseverance, but you're starting to take it to the "doing the same thing and expecting different results" level.
Can you cite the IC for that? I was sure that factor was something each person got to decide for herself, but you seem pretty sure about the infallibility of it. I just want to make sure there aren't any other absolutes that I need to know about.
For you it might be. It is not for me.
A sample size of n=1 is not evidence. Moreover, the example you provided is not analogous to the one you used to justify your claim. Being targeted specifically FOR the firearm is not the same as being targeted for murder because you have a firearm.
There are. Without CC we OCers wouldn't have idiotic threads like this to keep us entertained.
