Climate Change Update........

The #1 community for Gun Owners in Indiana

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • KLB

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Sep 12, 2011
    23,943
    77
    Porter County
    Scientists and Media were complete turds, even in 1978.
    A scientist having an incorrect hypothesis doesn't make you a turd. Trying to stop any debate about said hypothesis does. Testing and challenging a hypothesis is what science is all about.

    The ironic thing is, those that call others science deniers are in fact the science deniers.
     

    2tonic

    Master
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Apr 14, 2011
    4,084
    97
    N.W. Disillusionment
    A scientist having an incorrect hypothesis doesn't make you a turd. Trying to stop any debate about said hypothesis does. Testing and challenging a hypothesis is what science is all about.

    The ironic thing is, those that call others science deniers are in fact the science deniers.

    Agreed.
    However,
    Scientists disregarding data because it weakens their hypotheses........... are turds.
    Scientists who claim their hypotheses are "uncontestable", because they're the scientists.........are turds.
    Scientists who claim "the science is settled"........... are turds.
    Scientists who slant their results to fit the narrative desired by the sponsor of their grants........are turds.
     

    indyblue

    Guns & Pool Shooter
    Site Supporter
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Aug 13, 2013
    3,920
    129
    Indy Northside `O=o-
    Agreed.
    However,
    Scientists disregarding data because it weakens their hypotheses........... are turds.
    Scientists who claim their hypotheses are "uncontestable", because they're the scientists.........are turds.
    Scientists who claim "the science is settled"........... are turds.
    Scientists who slant their results to fit the narrative desired by the sponsor of their grants........are turds.
    Scientists who censor the ones that don’t agree come to the same conclusions from the data are turds.
     
    Last edited:

    KLB

    Grandmaster
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Sep 12, 2011
    23,943
    77
    Porter County
    Agreed.
    However,
    Scientists disregarding data because it weakens their hypotheses........... are turds.
    Scientists who claim their hypotheses are "uncontestable", because they're the scientists.........are turds.
    Scientists who claim "the science is settled"........... are turds.
    Scientists who slant their results to fit the narrative desired by the sponsor of their grants........are turds.
    Which all falls under the science denier accusers, so I'm not sure why the however. :dunno:
     
    Top Bottom