- Sep 3, 2009
- 7,726
- 38
conspiracy to commit a felony.
Better not even think about committing a crime around this guy!
Really? Are you sure?It is illegal to sell a long gun to someone who does not reside in a state that does not border the state you live in.
.
Really? Are you sure?
Now what? You have no problem with people conspiring to commit felonies? Is it ok to conspire to commit murder? Rob a bank or person? Rape? Sorry, but if you arrange for someone to buy a gun illegally, and especially if they carry that act out, you're just as responsible for the crime as they are. It's called guilt by association. Or, in other words, you're an accessory to that crime. And because he organized this whole thing AND video taped it, that's conspiracy, also known as a Felony.
So I guess you have no problem with this?
It is illegal to engage in interstate commerce of firearms unless you are a licensed dealer.
6birds has a God Complex. He was just being a smartarse. Best to ignore him.
If an accessory is guilty under the statue, that's one thing. That's not conspiracy--that's charging you as an accessory to a crime that has actually happened, not merely one that someone has thought about committing.
Taking someone to jail for "conspiracy" always has me skeptical.
Fair enough. I still don't think the planning portion of a crime should be illegal, though. Freedom of conscience is essential to a free society. I wish people wouldn't think about committing crimes, but I also believe they have a right to do so.
I guess I just have a problem with government punishing anyone for what they think, even if they're thinking about doing something terrible.
Conspiracy is not "thinking about a crime." The elements of conspiracy require the commission of an overt act designed to advance the criminal agreement from inchoate to completion.
Any 1L knows that.
Better not even think about committing a crime around this guy!
Conspiracy is not "thinking about a crime." The elements of conspiracy require the commission of an overt act designed to advance the criminal agreement from inchoate to completion. Any 1L knows that.
In whose opinion? You should already know where this is going. I have no confidence in government at any level to apply this standard impartially.
I guess it's a good thing I'm not one then, huh?
Condescending much?
If it was "illiegal" why did he do it? Why doesn't he get arrested if it was SOO illiegal?
Because there was no law enforcemnt officers around to see the transactions.
Does it make it any less illegal if I rob a bank and get away with it?
Because there was no law enforcemnt officers around to see the transactions.
Does it make it any less illegal if I rob a bank and get away with it?
It seems the real problem is that he thinks criminalizing something prevents people from doing it.